FX-7600P
VS
Celeron G5920

FX-7600P vs Celeron G5920

AMD

FX-7600P

4 Cores4 Thrd35 WWMax: 3.6 GHz2014
VS
Intel

Celeron G5920

2 Cores2 Thrd58 WWMax: 3.5 GHz2020

Performance Spectrum - CPU

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. The FX-7600P is positioned at rank #939 in our cost-efficiency ranking, representing a Lower cost-benefit for your build. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar FX-7600P

#927
Atom x5-Z8300
MSRP: $20|Avg: N/A
1721%
#928
Atom Z3735G
MSRP: $17|Avg: N/A
1696%
#929
Core i5-480M
MSRP: $81|Avg: $77
1557%
#930
Core i5-460M
MSRP: $80|Avg: $129
1550%
#931
Core i5-2540M
MSRP: $266|Avg: $10
1535%
#933
Core i5-450M
MSRP: $32|Avg: $31
1483%
#934
Core i3-380M
MSRP: $49|Avg: $25
1422%
#935
Core i5-430M
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $33
1419%
#936
Core 2 Duo T6600
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $4
1381%
#939
FX-7600P
MSRP: $150|Avg: $45
100%
#940
Athlon II M300
MSRP: $100|Avg: $10
100%
#944
Athlon Neo X2 L335
MSRP: $80|Avg: $15
98%
#945
Core i7-3610QE
MSRP: $315|Avg: $105
97%
#948
A8-8600P
MSRP: $150|Avg: $30
96%
#950
FX-9800P
MSRP: $150|Avg: $45
96%
#951
Celeron 1020E
MSRP: $86|Avg: $20
96%
#954
Core i7-5850EQ
MSRP: $435|Avg: $370
95%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Per Dollar Celeron G5920

#287
Core Ultra 9 285T
MSRP: $549|Avg: $549
104%
#288
Ryzen Threadripper 1950
MSRP: $999|Avg: $300
34%
#288
Core i5-12500TE
MSRP: $225|Avg: $225
104%
#289
Athlon Silver PRO 3125GE
MSRP: $108|Avg: $70
103%
#290
Core i9-10900KF
MSRP: $509|Avg: $336
103%
#291
Core i9-7900X
MSRP: $999|Avg: $188
32%
#291
Core i9-14900T
MSRP: $549|Avg: $577
103%
#292
Core i5-13500T
MSRP: $342|Avg: $342
103%
#293
Core i3-10300
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $140.49
103%
#294
Core i9-10900F
MSRP: $464|Avg: $300
102%
#294
Core i9-7920X
MSRP: $1199|Avg: $236
30%
#295
Ryzen 7 5800X3D
MSRP: $449|Avg: $429
102%
#295
Core i9-7940X
MSRP: $1399|Avg: $275
28%
#296
Core i7-9700F
MSRP: $323|Avg: $200
102%
#297
Ryzen Threadripper 9960X
MSRP: $1499|Avg: $1419
102%
#298
Core i5-9500F
MSRP: $187|Avg: $154
101%
#298
Core i9-7960X
MSRP: $1699|Avg: $185
26%
#299
Core i9-11900KB
MSRP: $539|Avg: $350
101%
#299
Core i9-7980XE
MSRP: $1999|Avg: $300
23%
#300
Core i7-10700F
MSRP: $310|Avg: $250
100%
#301
Core i7-10700T
MSRP: $355|Avg: $200
100%
#302
Core i7-6900K
MSRP: $1089|Avg: $1089
21%
#302
Celeron G5920
MSRP: $52|Avg: $40
100%
#303
Core i3-10105T
MSRP: $122|Avg: $122
99%
#303
Core i7-5960X
MSRP: $999|Avg: $83
21%
#304
Core i7-6950X
MSRP: $1723|Avg: $180
16%
#304
Celeron G5900
MSRP: $50|Avg: $42
99%
#305
Core 5 120
MSRP: $340|Avg: $340
99%
#306
Core i7-12700T
MSRP: $339|Avg: $337
98%
#307
Core 3 100HL
MSRP: $306|Avg: $280
97%
#308
Core i9-11900F
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $358.87
95%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Comparison

About PassMark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

🚀 Performance Leadership

Generational Difference: This comparison involves processors from different technological eras. The Celeron G5920 (2020) utilizes 14 nm technology and DDR4-2666, providing a fundamental performance advantage.
InsightFX-7600PCeleron G5920
Gaming
Superior gaming performance
Lower gaming performance
Workstation
Weaker in multi-core tasks
Better multi-core power
Price
⚠️ Higher cost ($45)
More affordable ($40)
Longevity
🛑 Legacy (Kaveri (2014−2015) / 28 nm)
✨ Modern (Comet Lake (2020−2025) / 14 nm)

💎 Value Proposition

The FX-7600P (2014) relies on 28 nm technology and DDR3-2133, placing it in a different performance category relative to modern standards.
InsightFX-7600PCeleron G5920
Cost Efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Better overall value (+13%)
Upfront Cost
⚠️ Higher cost ($45)
More affordable ($40)

Performance Check

Paired with RTX 4090

To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of FX-7600P and Celeron G5920

AMD

FX-7600P

The FX-7600P is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 4 June 2014 (11 years ago). It is based on the Kaveri (2014−2015) architecture. It features 4 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 2.7 GHz, with boost up to 3.6 GHz. L2 cache: 4096 kB. Built on 28 nm process technology. Socket: FP3. Thermal design power (TDP): 35 Watt. Memory support: DDR3-2133. Passmark benchmark score: 2,557 points. Launch price was $69.

Intel

Celeron G5920

The Celeron G5920 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2007-01-01. It is based on the Comet Lake (2020−2025) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency is 3.5 GHz, with boost up to 3.5 GHz. L3 cache: 2 MB (total). L2 cache: 256K (per core). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1200. Thermal design power (TDP): 58 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-2666. Passmark benchmark score: 2,577 points. Launch price was $69.

Processing Power

The FX-7600P packs 4 cores / 4 threads, while the Celeron G5920 offers 2 cores / 2 threads — the FX-7600P has 2 more cores. Boost clocks reach 3.6 GHz on the FX-7600P versus 3.5 GHz on the Celeron G5920 — a 2.8% clock advantage for the FX-7600P (base: 2.7 GHz vs 3.5 GHz). The FX-7600P uses the Kaveri (2014−2015) architecture (28 nm), while the Celeron G5920 uses Comet Lake (2020−2025) (14 nm). In PassMark, the FX-7600P scores 2,557 against the Celeron G5920's 2,577 — a 0.8% lead for the Celeron G5920.

FeatureFX-7600PCeleron G5920
Cores / Threads
4 / 4+100%
2 / 2
Boost Clock
3.6 GHz+3%
3.5 GHz
Base Clock
2.7 GHz
3.5 GHz+30%
L3 Cache
2 MB (total)
L2 Cache
4096 kB+1500%
256K (per core)
Process
28 nm
14 nm-50%
Architecture
Kaveri (2014−2015)
Comet Lake (2020−2025)
PassMark
2,557
2,577
Geekbench 6 Single
756
Geekbench 6 Multi
1,248
🧠

Memory & Platform

The FX-7600P uses the FP3 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Celeron G5920 uses LGA1200 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

FeatureFX-7600PCeleron G5920
Socket
FP3
LGA1200
PCIe Generation
PCIe 3.0
PCIe 3.0
Max RAM Speed
DDR4-2666
Max RAM Capacity
128 GB
RAM Channels
2
ECC Support
PCIe Lanes
16
🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization: not specified (FX-7600P) / VT-x (Celeron G5920). The Celeron G5920 includes integrated graphics (UHD Graphics 610), while the FX-7600P requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Celeron G5920 targets Budget. Direct competitor: Celeron G5920 rivals Pentium Gold G6405.

FeatureFX-7600PCeleron G5920
Integrated GPU
Yes
IGPU Model
UHD Graphics 610
Unlocked
No
AVX-512
No
Virtualization
VT-x
Target Use
Budget
💰

Value Analysis

The FX-7600P launched at $150 MSRP, while the Celeron G5920 debuted at $52. At current prices ($45 vs $40), the Celeron G5920 is $5 cheaper. In terms of value (PassMark points per dollar), the FX-7600P delivers 56.8 pts/$ vs 64.4 pts/$ for the Celeron G5920 — making the Celeron G5920 the 12.5% better value option.

FeatureFX-7600PCeleron G5920
MSRP
$150
$52-65%
Avg Price (30d)
$45
$40-11%
Performance per Dollar
56.8
64.4+13%
Release Date
2014
2020