FX-7600P vs Pentium G4400

AMD

FX-7600P

4 Cores4 Thrd35 WWMax: 3.6 GHz2014
Similar parts
·······
VS
Intel

Pentium G4400

2 Cores2 Thrd54 WWMax: 3.3 GHz2015
Similar parts
·······

FX-7600P vs Pentium G4400 Performance Spectrum

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

FX-7600P vs Pentium G4400 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

FX-7600P vs Pentium G4400: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

FX-7600P

2014

Why buy it

  • Draws 35W instead of 54W, a 19W reduction.

Trade-offs

  • Lower PassMark (2,557 vs 2,562).
  • Lower PassMark per dollar, at 17.0 vs 40.0 PassMark/$ ($150 MSRP vs $64 MSRP).

Pentium G4400

2015

Why buy it

  • +0.2% higher PassMark.
  • Costs $86 less on MSRP ($64 MSRP vs $150 MSRP).
  • Delivers 134.8% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 40.0 vs 17.0 PassMark/$ ($64 MSRP vs $150 MSRP).

Trade-offs

  • 54.3% higher power demand at 54W vs 35W.

Quick Answers

So, is Pentium G4400 better than FX-7600P?
It depends on what you want from the system. For gaming, FX-7600P is ahead with a 1.5% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. For rendering, compiling, streaming, and heavier multitasking, Pentium G4400 pulls ahead with 0.2% better PassMark.
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Pentium G4400 is the stronger fit. You are getting 0.2% better PassMark, backed by 2 cores and 2 threads.
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Pentium G4400 is the better buy right now. Pentium G4400 comes in $86 cheaper on MSRP at $64 MSRP versus $150 MSRP, and it still gives you 0.2% better PassMark. The compromise is that FX-7600P is still the better pure gaming CPU with a 1.5% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. It is also 134.8% better value on MSRP (40.0 vs 17.0 PassMark/$), so you are getting the faster CPU without taking a value hit on paper.
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Pentium G4400 makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2015 vs 2014) and more multi-core headroom with 2 cores / 2 threads instead of 4/4. That extra compute headroom is more likely to matter as games, background tasks, and creator workloads get heavier.

FX-7600P vs Pentium G4400 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

AMD

FX-7600P

The FX-7600P is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 4 June 2014 (11 years ago). It is based on the Kaveri (2014−2015) architecture. It features 4 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 2.7 GHz, with boost up to 3.6 GHz. L2 cache: 4096 kB. Built on 28 nm process technology. Socket: FP3. Thermal design power (TDP): 35 Watt. Memory support: DDR3-2133. Passmark benchmark score: 2,557 points. Launch price was $69.

Intel

Pentium G4400

The Pentium G4400 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 1 September 2015 (10 years ago). It is based on the Skylake (2015−2016) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency is 3.3 GHz, with boost up to 3.3 GHz. L3 cache: 3 MB. L2 cache: 256K (per core). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1151. Thermal design power (TDP): 54 Watt. Memory support: DDR3, DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 2,562 points. Launch price was $64.

Processing Power

The FX-7600P packs 4 cores / 4 threads, while the Pentium G4400 offers 2 cores / 2 threads — the FX-7600P has 2 more cores. Boost clocks reach 3.6 GHz on the FX-7600P versus 3.3 GHz on the Pentium G4400 — a 8.7% clock advantage for the FX-7600P (base: 2.7 GHz vs 3.3 GHz). The FX-7600P uses the Kaveri (2014−2015) architecture (28 nm), while the Pentium G4400 uses Skylake (2015−2016) (14 nm). In PassMark, the FX-7600P scores 2,557 against the Pentium G4400's 2,562 — a 0.2% lead for the Pentium G4400.

FeatureFX-7600PPentium G4400
Cores / Threads
4 / 4+100%
2 / 2
Boost Clock
3.6 GHz+9%
3.3 GHz
Base Clock
2.7 GHz
3.3 GHz+22%
L3 Cache
3 MB
L2 Cache
4096 kB+1500%
256K (per core)
Process
28 nm
14 nm-50%
Architecture
Kaveri (2014−2015)
Skylake (2015−2016)
PassMark
2,557
2,562
🧠

Memory & Platform

The FX-7600P uses the FP3 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Pentium G4400 uses LGA1151 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

FeatureFX-7600PPentium G4400
Socket
FP3
LGA1151
PCIe Generation
PCIe 3.0
PCIe 3.0
💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the FX-7600P was priced at $150, while the Pentium G4400 came in at $64. On launch pricing ($150 vs $64), Pentium G4400 was $86 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the FX-7600P delivers 17.0 pts/$ vs 40.0 pts/$ for the Pentium G4400 — making the Pentium G4400 the 80.5% better value option.

FeatureFX-7600PPentium G4400
MSRP
$150
$64-57%
Performance per Dollar
17.0
40.0+135%
Release Date
2014
2015

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.