Core i3-7020U vs FX-7600P

Core i3-7020U vs FX-7600P Performance Spectrum

Core i3-7020U

2 / 4

2,567

+0.4%

2,557

0.0%

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7955WX

Ryzen Threadripper 3990X

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Core i3-7020U vs FX-7600P FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Core i3-7020U vs FX-7600P: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Core i3-7020U

2018

Why buy it

✅+0.4% higher PassMark.
✅Draws 15W instead of 35W, a 20W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than FX-7600P across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.

FX-7600P

2014

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +3.5% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark (2,557 vs 2,567).
❌Launch MSRP is still $150 MSRP, while Core i3-7020U mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
❌133.3% higher power demand at 35W vs 15W.

Quick Answers

So, is Core i3-7020U better than FX-7600P?

It depends on what you want from the system. For gaming, FX-7600P is ahead with a 3.5% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. For rendering, compiling, streaming, and heavier multitasking, Core i3-7020U pulls ahead with 0.4% better PassMark.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Core i3-7020U is the stronger fit. You are getting 0.4% better PassMark, backed by 2 cores and 4 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Core i3-7020U is the easy recommendation for a fresh desktop build. Core i3-7020U comes in at an unclear MSRP at unclear MSRP versus $150 MSRP, and it still gives you 0.4% better PassMark. FX-7600P only looks good on raw value math because it is a cheap legacy laptop chip, not because it is a real desktop gaming recommendation. It simply does not keep up in modern games.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Core i3-7020U makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2018 vs 2014) and more multi-core headroom with 2 cores / 4 threads instead of 4/4. That extra compute headroom is more likely to matter as games, background tasks, and creator workloads get heavier.

Core i3-7020U vs FX-7600P Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Core i3-7020U

The Core i3-7020U is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 10 April 2018 (7 years ago). It is based on the Kaby Lake (2016−2019) architecture. It features 2 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 2.3 GHz, with boost up to 2.3 GHz. L3 cache: 3 MB. L2 cache: 512 kB. Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: BGA1356. Thermal design power (TDP): 15 Watt. Memory support: DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 2,567 points. Launch price was $281.

FX-7600P

The FX-7600P is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 4 June 2014 (11 years ago). It is based on the Kaveri (2014−2015) architecture. It features 4 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 2.7 GHz, with boost up to 3.6 GHz. L2 cache: 4096 kB. Built on 28 nm process technology. Socket: FP3. Thermal design power (TDP): 35 Watt. Memory support: DDR3-2133. Passmark benchmark score: 2,557 points. Launch price was $69.

⚡

Processing Power

The Core i3-7020U packs 2 cores / 4 threads, while the FX-7600P offers 4 cores / 4 threads — the FX-7600P has 2 more cores. Boost clocks reach 2.3 GHz on the Core i3-7020U versus 3.6 GHz on the FX-7600P — a 44.1% clock advantage for the FX-7600P (base: 2.3 GHz vs 2.7 GHz). The Core i3-7020U uses the Kaby Lake (2016−2019) architecture (14 nm), while the FX-7600P uses Kaveri (2014−2015) (28 nm). In PassMark, the Core i3-7020U scores 2,567 against the FX-7600P's 2,557 — a 0.4% lead for the Core i3-7020U.

Feature	Core i3-7020U	FX-7600P
Cores / Threads	2 / 4	4 / 4+100%
Boost Clock	2.3 GHz	3.6 GHz+57%
Base Clock	2.3 GHz	2.7 GHz+17%
L3 Cache	3 MB	—
L2 Cache	512 kB	4096 kB+700%
Process	14 nm-50%	28 nm
Architecture	Kaby Lake (2016−2019)	Kaveri (2014−2015)
PassMark	2,567	2,557

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Core i3-7020U uses the BGA1356 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the FX-7600P uses FP3 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.