Core i5-7Y54 vs FX-7600P

Intel

Core i5-7Y54

2 Cores4 Thrd4.5 WWMax: 3.2 GHz2016
Similar parts
·······
VS
AMD

FX-7600P

4 Cores4 Thrd35 WWMax: 3.6 GHz2014
Similar parts
·······

Core i5-7Y54 vs FX-7600P Performance Spectrum

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Core i5-7Y54 vs FX-7600P FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Core i5-7Y54 vs FX-7600P: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Core i5-7Y54

2016

Why buy it

  • +1.1% higher PassMark.
  • Draws 5W instead of 35W, a 31W reduction.
  • 100+% more PCIe lanes (10 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
  • Integrated graphics onboard with Intel HD Graphics 615, while FX-7600P needs a discrete GPU.

Trade-offs

  • Lower PassMark per dollar, at 9.2 vs 17.0 PassMark/$ ($281 MSRP vs $150 MSRP).

FX-7600P

2014

Why buy it

  • Costs $131 less on MSRP ($150 MSRP vs $281 MSRP).
  • Delivers 85.2% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 17.0 vs 9.2 PassMark/$ ($150 MSRP vs $281 MSRP).

Trade-offs

  • Lower PassMark (2,557 vs 2,586).
  • 677.8% higher power demand at 35W vs 4.5W.
  • No integrated graphics, while Core i5-7Y54 can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.

Quick Answers

So, is Core i5-7Y54 better than FX-7600P?
It depends on what you want from the system. For gaming, FX-7600P is ahead with a 2.9% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. For rendering, compiling, streaming, and heavier multitasking, Core i5-7Y54 pulls ahead with 1.1% better PassMark.
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Core i5-7Y54 is the stronger fit. You are getting 1.1% better PassMark, backed by 2 cores and 4 threads.
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Core i5-7Y54 is the easy recommendation for a fresh desktop build. Core i5-7Y54 comes in 87.3% more expensive on MSRP at $281 MSRP versus $150 MSRP, and it still gives you 1.1% better PassMark. FX-7600P only looks good on raw value math because it is a cheap legacy laptop chip, not because it is a real desktop gaming recommendation. It simply does not keep up in modern games.
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Core i5-7Y54 makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2016 vs 2014) and more multi-core headroom with 2 cores / 4 threads instead of 4/4. That extra compute headroom is more likely to matter as games, background tasks, and creator workloads get heavier.

Core i5-7Y54 vs FX-7600P Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Intel

Core i5-7Y54

The Core i5-7Y54 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 30 August 2016 (9 years ago). It is based on the Kaby Lake (2016−2019) architecture. It features 2 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 1.2 GHz, with boost up to 3.2 GHz. L3 cache: 4 MB. L2 cache: 512 kB. Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: FCBGA1515. Thermal design power (TDP): 4.5 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 2,586 points. Launch price was $281.

AMD

FX-7600P

The FX-7600P is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 4 June 2014 (11 years ago). It is based on the Kaveri (2014−2015) architecture. It features 4 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 2.7 GHz, with boost up to 3.6 GHz. L2 cache: 4096 kB. Built on 28 nm process technology. Socket: FP3. Thermal design power (TDP): 35 Watt. Memory support: DDR3-2133. Passmark benchmark score: 2,557 points. Launch price was $69.

Processing Power

The Core i5-7Y54 packs 2 cores / 4 threads, while the FX-7600P offers 4 cores / 4 threads — the FX-7600P has 2 more cores. Boost clocks reach 3.2 GHz on the Core i5-7Y54 versus 3.6 GHz on the FX-7600P — a 11.8% clock advantage for the FX-7600P (base: 1.2 GHz vs 2.7 GHz). The Core i5-7Y54 uses the Kaby Lake (2016−2019) architecture (14 nm), while the FX-7600P uses Kaveri (2014−2015) (28 nm). In PassMark, the Core i5-7Y54 scores 2,586 against the FX-7600P's 2,557 — a 1.1% lead for the Core i5-7Y54.

FeatureCore i5-7Y54FX-7600P
Cores / Threads
2 / 4
4 / 4+100%
Boost Clock
3.2 GHz
3.6 GHz+12%
Base Clock
1.2 GHz
2.7 GHz+125%
L3 Cache
4 MB
L2 Cache
512 kB
4096 kB+700%
Process
14 nm-50%
28 nm
Architecture
Kaby Lake (2016−2019)
Kaveri (2014−2015)
PassMark
2,586+1%
2,557
Geekbench 6 Single
900
Geekbench 6 Multi
1,700
🧠

Memory & Platform

The Core i5-7Y54 uses the FCBGA1515 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the FX-7600P uses FP3 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

FeatureCore i5-7Y54FX-7600P
Socket
FCBGA1515
FP3
PCIe Generation
PCIe 3.0
PCIe 3.0
Max RAM Speed
LPDDR3-1866
Max RAM Capacity
16 GB
RAM Channels
2
ECC Support
No
PCIe Lanes
10
🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization: VT-x, VT-d, EPT (Core i5-7Y54) / not specified (FX-7600P). The Core i5-7Y54 includes integrated graphics (Intel HD Graphics 615), while the FX-7600P requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Core i5-7Y54 targets Tablet/2-in-1.

FeatureCore i5-7Y54FX-7600P
Integrated GPU
Yes
IGPU Model
Intel HD Graphics 615
Unlocked
No
AVX-512
No
Virtualization
VT-x, VT-d, EPT
Target Use
Tablet/2-in-1
💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the Core i5-7Y54 was priced at $281, while the FX-7600P came in at $150. On launch pricing ($281 vs $150), FX-7600P was $131 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Core i5-7Y54 delivers 9.2 pts/$ vs 17.0 pts/$ for the FX-7600P — making the FX-7600P the 59.8% better value option.

FeatureCore i5-7Y54FX-7600P
MSRP
$281
$150-47%
Performance per Dollar
9.2
17.0+85%
Release Date
2016
2014

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.