
Core i5-7Y54

Pentium B940
Core i5-7Y54 vs Pentium B940 Performance Spectrum
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Core i5-7Y54 vs Pentium B940 FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Valorant

Among Us

Apex Legends

ARC Raiders

Baldur's Gate 3

Call of Duty: Black Ops 6
Core i5-7Y54 vs Pentium B940: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.
Core i5-7Y54
2016Why buy it
- β +100% larger total L3 cache (4 MB vs 2 MB).
- β Draws 5W instead of 35W, a 31W reduction.
- β 100+% more PCIe lanes (10 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
- β Integrated graphics onboard with Intel HD Graphics 615, while Pentium B940 needs a discrete GPU.
Trade-offs
- βLower PassMark (2,586 vs 2,610).
- βLower PassMark per dollar, at 9.2 vs 19.5 PassMark/$ ($281 MSRP vs $134 MSRP).
Pentium B940
2011Why buy it
- β +0.9% higher PassMark.
- β Costs $147 less on MSRP ($134 MSRP vs $281 MSRP).
- β Delivers 111.6% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 19.5 vs 9.2 PassMark/$ ($134 MSRP vs $281 MSRP).
Trade-offs
- βSmaller total L3 cache (2 MB vs 4 MB).
- β677.8% higher power demand at 35W vs 4.5W.
- βNo integrated graphics, while Core i5-7Y54 can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.
Quick Answers
So, is Core i5-7Y54 better than Pentium B940?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Core i5-7Y54 vs Pentium B940 Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Core i5-7Y54
The Core i5-7Y54 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 30 August 2016 (9 years ago). It is based on the Kaby Lake (2016β2019) architecture. It features 2 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 1.2 GHz, with boost up to 3.2 GHz. L3 cache: 4 MB. L2 cache: 512 kB. Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: FCBGA1515. Thermal design power (TDP): 4.5 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 2,586 points. Launch price was $281.

Pentium B940
The Pentium B940 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 19 June 2011 (14 years ago). It is based on the Sandy Bridge (2011β2013) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency is 2 GHz, with boost up to 2 GHz. L3 cache: 2 MB (total). L2 cache: 256K (per core). Built on 32 nm process technology. Socket: PGA988. Thermal design power (TDP): 35 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 2,610 points. Launch price was $134.
Processing Power
The Core i5-7Y54 packs 2 cores / 4 threads, matching the Pentium B940's 2 cores. Boost clocks reach 3.2 GHz on the Core i5-7Y54 versus 2 GHz on the Pentium B940 β a 46.2% clock advantage for the Core i5-7Y54 (base: 1.2 GHz vs 2 GHz). The Core i5-7Y54 uses the Kaby Lake (2016β2019) architecture (14 nm), while the Pentium B940 uses Sandy Bridge (2011β2013) (32 nm). In PassMark, the Core i5-7Y54 scores 2,586 against the Pentium B940's 2,610 β a 0.9% lead for the Pentium B940. L3 cache: 4 MB on the Core i5-7Y54 vs 2 MB (total) on the Pentium B940.
| Feature | Core i5-7Y54 | Pentium B940 |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 2 / 4 | 2 / 2 |
| Boost Clock | 3.2 GHz+60% | 2 GHz |
| Base Clock | 1.2 GHz | 2 GHz+67% |
| L3 Cache | 4 MB+100% | 2 MB (total) |
| L2 Cache | 512 kB+100% | 256K (per core) |
| Process | 14 nm-56% | 32 nm |
| Architecture | Kaby Lake (2016β2019) | Sandy Bridge (2011β2013) |
| PassMark | 2,586 | 2,610 |
| Geekbench 6 Single | 900 | β |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | 1,700 | β |
Memory & Platform
The Core i5-7Y54 uses the FCBGA1515 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Pentium B940 uses PGA988 (PCIe 2.0) β making them incompatible on the same motherboard.
| Feature | Core i5-7Y54 | Pentium B940 |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | FCBGA1515 | PGA988 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 3.0+50% | PCIe 2.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | LPDDR3-1866 | β |
| Max RAM Capacity | 16 GB | β |
| RAM Channels | 2 | β |
| ECC Support | No | β |
| PCIe Lanes | 10 | β |
Advanced Features
Virtualization: VT-x, VT-d, EPT (Core i5-7Y54) / not specified (Pentium B940). The Core i5-7Y54 includes integrated graphics (Intel HD Graphics 615), while the Pentium B940 requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Core i5-7Y54 targets Tablet/2-in-1.
| Feature | Core i5-7Y54 | Pentium B940 |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | Yes | β |
| IGPU Model | Intel HD Graphics 615 | β |
| Unlocked | No | β |
| AVX-512 | No | β |
| Virtualization | VT-x, VT-d, EPT | β |
| Target Use | Tablet/2-in-1 | β |
Value Analysis
At launch, the Core i5-7Y54 was priced at $281, while the Pentium B940 came in at $134. On launch pricing ($281 vs $134), Pentium B940 was $147 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Core i5-7Y54 delivers 9.2 pts/$ vs 19.5 pts/$ for the Pentium B940 β making the Pentium B940 the 71.6% better value option.
| Feature | Core i5-7Y54 | Pentium B940 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $281 | $134-52% |
| Performance per Dollar | 9.2 | 19.5+112% |
| Release Date | 2016 | 2011 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.














