3015e vs Core i5-7Y54

3015e vs Core i5-7Y54 Performance Spectrum

3015e

2 / 4

2,618

+1.2%

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7955WX

Ryzen Threadripper 3990X

Core i5-7Y54

2 / 4

2,586

0.0%

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

3015e vs Core i5-7Y54 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

3015e vs Core i5-7Y54: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

3015e

2020

Why buy it

✅+1.2% higher PassMark.
✅Draws 1W instead of 5W, a 4W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Fewer obvious downsides in this matchup outside of normal market pricing swings.

Core i5-7Y54

2016

Why buy it

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark (2,586 vs 2,618).
❌Launch MSRP is still $281 MSRP, while 3015e mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
❌350% higher power demand at 4.5W vs 1W.

Quick Answers

So, is 3015e better than Core i5-7Y54?

It depends on what you want from the system. For gaming, Core i5-7Y54 is ahead with a 0.0% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. For rendering, compiling, streaming, and heavier multitasking, 3015e pulls ahead with 1.2% better PassMark.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, 3015e is the stronger fit. You are getting 1.2% better PassMark, backed by 2 cores and 4 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

3015e is the easy recommendation for a fresh desktop build. 3015e comes in at an unclear MSRP at unclear MSRP versus $281 MSRP, and it still gives you 1.2% better PassMark. Core i5-7Y54 only looks good on raw value math because it is a cheap legacy laptop chip, not because it is a real desktop gaming recommendation. It simply does not keep up in modern games.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

3015e makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2020 vs 2016) and more multi-core headroom with 2 cores / 4 threads instead of 2/4. That extra compute headroom is more likely to matter as games, background tasks, and creator workloads get heavier.

3015e vs Core i5-7Y54 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

3015e

The 3015e is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 2014-01-01. It is based on the Pollock (Zen) (2020) architecture. It features 2 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 1.2 GHz, with boost up to 2.3 GHz. L3 cache: 4 MB. L2 cache: 1 MB. Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: FT5. Thermal design power (TDP): 1 MB + 4 MB. Memory support: DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 2,618 points. Launch price was $50.

Core i5-7Y54

The Core i5-7Y54 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 30 August 2016 (9 years ago). It is based on the Kaby Lake (2016−2019) architecture. It features 2 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 1.2 GHz, with boost up to 3.2 GHz. L3 cache: 4 MB. L2 cache: 512 kB. Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: FCBGA1515. Thermal design power (TDP): 4.5 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 2,586 points. Launch price was $281.

⚡

Processing Power

Both the 3015e and Core i5-7Y54 share an identical 2-core/4-thread configuration. Boost clocks reach 2.3 GHz on the 3015e versus 3.2 GHz on the Core i5-7Y54 — a 32.7% clock advantage for the Core i5-7Y54 (base: 1.2 GHz vs 1.2 GHz). The 3015e uses the Pollock (Zen) (2020) architecture (14 nm), while the Core i5-7Y54 uses Kaby Lake (2016−2019) (14 nm). In PassMark, the 3015e scores 2,618 against the Core i5-7Y54's 2,586 — a 1.2% lead for the 3015e. Both processors carry 4 MB of L3 cache.

Feature	3015e	Core i5-7Y54
Cores / Threads	2 / 4	2 / 4
Boost Clock	2.3 GHz	3.2 GHz+39%
Base Clock	1.2 GHz	1.2 GHz
L3 Cache	4 MB	4 MB
L2 Cache	1 MB+100%	512 kB
Process	14 nm	14 nm
Architecture	Pollock (Zen) (2020)	Kaby Lake (2016−2019)
PassMark	2,618+1%	2,586
Geekbench 6 Single	—	900
Geekbench 6 Multi	—	1,700

🧠

Memory & Platform

The 3015e uses the FT5 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Core i5-7Y54 uses FCBGA1515 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches 1600 on the 3015e versus LPDDR3-1866 on the Core i5-7Y54 — the Core i5-7Y54 supports 16.6% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. Both support up to 16 GB of RAM. Memory channels: 1 (3015e) vs 2 (Core i5-7Y54). PCIe lanes: 8 (3015e) vs 10 (Core i5-7Y54) — the Core i5-7Y54 offers 2 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: FT5 (3015e) and SoC (Core i5-7Y54).

Feature	3015e	Core i5-7Y54
Socket	FT5	FCBGA1515
PCIe Generation	PCIe 3.0	PCIe 3.0
Max RAM Speed	1600	LPDDR3-1866+17%
Max RAM Capacity	16 GB	16 GB
RAM Channels	1	2+100%
ECC Support	No	No
PCIe Lanes	8	10+25%

🔧

Advanced Features

Neither processor supports overclocking. Virtualization support: true (3015e) vs VT-x, VT-d, EPT (Core i5-7Y54). Both include integrated graphics — Vega 3 (3015e) and Intel HD Graphics 615 (Core i5-7Y54) — useful as a fallback for troubleshooting or display output without a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Core i5-7Y54 targets Tablet/2-in-1. Direct competitor: 3015e rivals Celeron N4120.