
Core i5-7Y54

Xeon E5450
Core i5-7Y54 vs Xeon E5450 Performance Spectrum
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Core i5-7Y54 vs Xeon E5450 FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Valorant

Apex Legends

ARC Raiders

Baldur's Gate 3

Call of Duty: Warzone

Civilization VI
Core i5-7Y54 vs Xeon E5450: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.
Core i5-7Y54
2016Why buy it
- ✅+0.2% higher PassMark.
- ✅Draws 5W instead of 80W, a 76W reduction.
- ✅100+% more PCIe lanes (10 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
- ✅Integrated graphics onboard with Intel HD Graphics 615, while Xeon E5450 needs a discrete GPU.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Xeon E5450 across 44 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (4 MB vs 12 MB).
- ❌Less compelling for workstation-style loads than Xeon E5450, which brings 4 cores / 4 threads.
- ❌Launch MSRP is still $281 MSRP, while Xeon E5450 mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
Xeon E5450
2007Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +3.4% higher average FPS across 44 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅+200% larger total L3 cache (12 MB vs 4 MB).
- ✅Better for workstations and heavier parallel workloads: 4 cores / 4 threads.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark (2,581 vs 2,586).
- ❌1677.8% higher power demand at 80W vs 4.5W.
- ❌No integrated graphics, while Core i5-7Y54 can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.
Quick Answers
So, is Core i5-7Y54 better than Xeon E5450?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Core i5-7Y54 vs Xeon E5450 Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Core i5-7Y54
The Core i5-7Y54 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 30 August 2016 (9 years ago). It is based on the Kaby Lake (2016−2019) architecture. It features 2 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 1.2 GHz, with boost up to 3.2 GHz. L3 cache: 4 MB. L2 cache: 512 kB. Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: FCBGA1515. Thermal design power (TDP): 4.5 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 2,586 points. Launch price was $281.

Xeon E5450
The Xeon E5450 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 11 November 2007 (18 years ago). It is based on the Harpertown (2007−2008) architecture. It features 4 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 3 GHz, with boost up to 3 GHz. L3 cache: 12 MB L2 Cache. L2 cache: 6 MB (total). Built on 45 nm process technology. Socket: LGA771. Thermal design power (TDP): 80 Watt. Memory support: DDR2, DDR3 Depends on motherboard. Passmark benchmark score: 2,581 points. Launch price was $915.
Processing Power
The Core i5-7Y54 packs 2 cores / 4 threads, while the Xeon E5450 offers 4 cores / 4 threads — the Xeon E5450 has 2 more cores. Boost clocks reach 3.2 GHz on the Core i5-7Y54 versus 3 GHz on the Xeon E5450 — a 6.5% clock advantage for the Core i5-7Y54 (base: 1.2 GHz vs 3 GHz). The Core i5-7Y54 uses the Kaby Lake (2016−2019) architecture (14 nm), while the Xeon E5450 uses Harpertown (2007−2008) (45 nm). In PassMark, the Core i5-7Y54 scores 2,586 against the Xeon E5450's 2,581 — a 0.2% lead for the Core i5-7Y54. L3 cache: 4 MB on the Core i5-7Y54 vs 12 MB L2 Cache on the Xeon E5450.
| Feature | Core i5-7Y54 | Xeon E5450 |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 2 / 4 | 4 / 4+100% |
| Boost Clock | 3.2 GHz+7% | 3 GHz |
| Base Clock | 1.2 GHz | 3 GHz+150% |
| L3 Cache | 4 MB | 12 MB L2 Cache+200% |
| L2 Cache | 512 kB | 6 MB (total)+1100% |
| Process | 14 nm-69% | 45 nm |
| Architecture | Kaby Lake (2016−2019) | Harpertown (2007−2008) |
| PassMark | 2,586 | 2,581 |
| Geekbench 6 Single | 900 | — |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | 1,700 | — |
Memory & Platform
The Core i5-7Y54 uses the FCBGA1515 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Xeon E5450 uses LGA771 (PCIe 2.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.
| Feature | Core i5-7Y54 | Xeon E5450 |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | FCBGA1515 | LGA771 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 3.0+50% | PCIe 2.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | LPDDR3-1866 | — |
| Max RAM Capacity | 16 GB | — |
| RAM Channels | 2 | — |
| ECC Support | No | — |
| PCIe Lanes | 10 | — |
Advanced Features
Virtualization: VT-x, VT-d, EPT (Core i5-7Y54) / not specified (Xeon E5450). The Core i5-7Y54 includes integrated graphics (Intel HD Graphics 615), while the Xeon E5450 requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Core i5-7Y54 targets Tablet/2-in-1.
| Feature | Core i5-7Y54 | Xeon E5450 |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | Yes | — |
| IGPU Model | Intel HD Graphics 615 | — |
| Unlocked | No | — |
| AVX-512 | No | — |
| Virtualization | VT-x, VT-d, EPT | — |
| Target Use | Tablet/2-in-1 | — |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.













