FX-770K
VS
Core i5-6260U

FX-770K vs Core i5-6260U

AMD

FX-770K

4 Cores4 Thrd65 WWMax: 3.9 GHz2014
VS
Intel

Core i5-6260U

2 Cores4 Thrd512 WWMax: 2.9 GHz2015

Performance Spectrum - CPU

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar

Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Per Dollar Core i5-6260U

#124
Core i5-1240P
MSRP: $309|Avg: $200
98%
#125
Core i7-13700H
MSRP: $502|Avg: N/A
98%
#394
Atom x5-Z8300
MSRP: $20|Avg: N/A
550%
#395
Atom Z3735G
MSRP: $17|Avg: N/A
542%
#396
Core i5-480M
MSRP: $81|Avg: $77
498%
#397
Core i5-460M
MSRP: $80|Avg: $129
495%
#398
Core i5-2540M
MSRP: $266|Avg: $10
491%
#400
Core i5-450M
MSRP: $32|Avg: $31
474%
#401
Core i3-380M
MSRP: $49|Avg: $25
455%
#402
Core i5-430M
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $33
454%
#403
Core 2 Duo T6600
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $4
442%
#406
Core i5-6260U
MSRP: N/A|Avg: N/A
100%
#421
Core i5-9400H
MSRP: $182|Avg: N/A
97%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Comparison

About PassMark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

🚀 Performance Leadership

Performance Trade-off: The FX-770K leads in gaming performance. However, the Core i5-6260U is the stronger candidate for professional workloads, offering 0.9% greater multi-core processing power.
InsightFX-770KCore i5-6260U
Gaming
Superior gaming performance
Lower gaming performance
Workstation
Weaker in multi-core tasks
Better multi-core power
Price
⚠️ Higher cost ($59)
More affordable ($0)
Longevity
🛑 Legacy (Kaveri (2014−2015) / 28 nm)
🛑 Legacy (Skylake (2015−2016) / 14 nm)

💎 Value Proposition

InsightFX-770KCore i5-6260U
Cost Efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Upfront Cost
⚠️ Higher cost ($59)
More affordable ($0)

Performance Check

Paired with RTX 4090

To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of FX-770K and Core i5-6260U

AMD

FX-770K

The FX-770K is manufactured by AMD. It was released in Dezembro 2014 (11 years ago). It is based on the Kaveri (2014−2015) architecture. It features 4 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 3.5 GHz, with boost up to 3.9 GHz. L2 cache: 4 MB. Built on 28 nm process technology. Socket: FM2+. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR3-2133. Passmark benchmark score: 3,172 points. Launch price was $69.

Intel

Core i5-6260U

The Core i5-6260U is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 1 September 2015 (10 years ago). It is based on the Skylake (2015−2016) architecture. It features 2 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 1.8 GHz, with boost up to 2.9 GHz. L3 cache: 4 MB. L2 cache: 512 kB. Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: BGA1356. Thermal design power (TDP): 15 Watt. Memory support: DDR3, DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 3,200 points. Launch price was $304.

Processing Power

The FX-770K packs 4 cores / 4 threads, while the Core i5-6260U offers 2 cores / 4 threads — the FX-770K has 2 more cores. Boost clocks reach 3.9 GHz on the FX-770K versus 2.9 GHz on the Core i5-6260U — a 29.4% clock advantage for the FX-770K (base: 3.5 GHz vs 1.8 GHz). The FX-770K uses the Kaveri (2014−2015) architecture (28 nm), while the Core i5-6260U uses Skylake (2015−2016) (14 nm). In PassMark, the FX-770K scores 3,172 against the Core i5-6260U's 3,200 — a 0.9% lead for the Core i5-6260U.

FeatureFX-770KCore i5-6260U
Cores / Threads
4 / 4+100%
2 / 4
Boost Clock
3.9 GHz+34%
2.9 GHz
Base Clock
3.5 GHz+94%
1.8 GHz
L3 Cache
4 MB
L2 Cache
4 MB+700%
512 kB
Process
28 nm
14 nm-50%
Architecture
Kaveri (2014−2015)
Skylake (2015−2016)
PassMark
3,172
3,200
Geekbench 6 Single
979
🧠

Memory & Platform

The FX-770K uses the FM2+ socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Core i5-6260U uses BGA1356 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

FeatureFX-770KCore i5-6260U
Socket
FM2+
BGA1356
PCIe Generation
PCIe 3.0
PCIe 3.0
Max RAM Speed
DDR4-2133
Max RAM Capacity
32 GB
RAM Channels
2
ECC Support
PCIe Lanes
12
🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization: not specified (FX-770K) / VT-x, VT-d, EPT (Core i5-6260U). The Core i5-6260U includes integrated graphics (Iris Graphics 540), while the FX-770K requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Core i5-6260U targets Mainstream Laptop. Direct competitor: Core i5-6260U rivals A12-9720P.

FeatureFX-770KCore i5-6260U
Integrated GPU
Yes
IGPU Model
Iris Graphics 540
Unlocked
No
AVX-512
No
Virtualization
VT-x, VT-d, EPT
Target Use
Mainstream Laptop