
FX-8100 vs Core i5-2500K

FX-8100

Core i5-2500K
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The FX-8100 is positioned at rank 928 and the Core i5-2500K is on rank 828, so the Core i5-2500K offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar FX-8100
Performance Per Dollar Core i5-2500K
Performance Comparison
About PassMark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
| Insight | FX-8100 | Core i5-2500K |
|---|---|---|
| Gaming | ❌ Lower gaming performance | ✅ Superior gaming performance |
| Workstation | ❌ Weaker in multi-core tasks | ✅ Better multi-core power |
| Price | ⚠️ Higher cost ($50) | ✅ More affordable ($35) |
| Longevity | 🛑 Legacy (Zambezi (2011−2012) / 32 nm) | 🛑 Legacy (Sandy Bridge (2011−2013) / 32 nm) |
💎 Value Proposition
| Insight | FX-8100 | Core i5-2500K |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ❌ Lower cost efficiency | ✅ Better overall value (+44%) |
| Upfront Cost | ⚠️ Higher cost ($50) | ✅ More affordable ($35) |
Performance Check
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of FX-8100 and Core i5-2500K

FX-8100
The FX-8100 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 12 October 2011 (14 years ago). It is based on the Zambezi (2011−2012) architecture. It features 8 cores and 8 threads. Base frequency is 2.8 GHz, with boost up to 3.7 GHz. L3 cache: 8 MB (total). L2 cache: 8 MB. Built on 32 nm process technology. Socket: AM3+. Thermal design power (TDP): 95 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 4,095 points. Launch price was $69.

Core i5-2500K
The Core i5-2500K is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 9 January 2011 (14 years ago). It is based on the Sandy Bridge (2011−2013) architecture. It features 4 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 3.3 GHz, with boost up to 3.7 GHz. L3 cache: 6 MB (total). L2 cache: 256K (per core). Built on 32 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1155. Thermal design power (TDP): 95 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 4,141 points. Launch price was $216.
Processing Power
The FX-8100 packs 8 cores / 8 threads, while the Core i5-2500K offers 4 cores / 4 threads — the FX-8100 has 4 more cores. Boost clocks reach 3.7 GHz on the FX-8100 versus 3.7 GHz on the Core i5-2500K — identical boost frequencies (base: 2.8 GHz vs 3.3 GHz). The FX-8100 uses the Zambezi (2011−2012) architecture (32 nm), while the Core i5-2500K uses Sandy Bridge (2011−2013) (32 nm). In PassMark, the FX-8100 scores 4,095 against the Core i5-2500K's 4,141 — a 1.1% lead for the Core i5-2500K. Geekbench 6 single-core — the metric most relevant to gaming — records 455 vs 684, a 40.2% lead for the Core i5-2500K that directly translates to higher frame rates. Multi-core Geekbench: 1,621 vs 2,032 (22.5% advantage for the Core i5-2500K). L3 cache: 8 MB (total) on the FX-8100 vs 6 MB (total) on the Core i5-2500K.
| Feature | FX-8100 | Core i5-2500K |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 8 / 8+100% | 4 / 4 |
| Boost Clock | 3.7 GHz | 3.7 GHz |
| Base Clock | 2.8 GHz | 3.3 GHz+18% |
| L3 Cache | 8 MB (total)+33% | 6 MB (total) |
| L2 Cache | 8 MB+3100% | 256K (per core) |
| Process | 32 nm | 32 nm |
| Architecture | Zambezi (2011−2012) | Sandy Bridge (2011−2013) |
| PassMark | 4,095 | 4,141+1% |
| Cinebench R23 Multi | — | 3,200 |
| Geekbench 6 Single | 455 | 684+50% |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | 1,621 | 2,032+25% |
Memory & Platform
The FX-8100 uses the AM3+ socket (PCIe 2.0), while the Core i5-2500K uses LGA1155 (PCIe 2.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Both support up to DDR3-1866 memory speed. The Core i5-2500K supports up to 32 GB of RAM compared to 16 GB — 66.7% more capacity for professional workloads. Both feature 2-channel memory with ECC support. PCIe lanes: 0 (FX-8100) vs 16 (Core i5-2500K) — the Core i5-2500K offers 16 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: AMD 990FX,AMD 970 (FX-8100) and P67,Z68,Z77 (Core i5-2500K).
| Feature | FX-8100 | Core i5-2500K |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | AM3+ | LGA1155 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 2.0 | PCIe 2.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR3-1866 | DDR3-1333 |
| Max RAM Capacity | 16 GB | 32 GB+100% |
| RAM Channels | 2 | 2 |
| ECC Support | ❌ | ❌ |
| PCIe Lanes | 0 | 16 |
Advanced Features
Both processors feature an unlocked multiplier for overclocking. Virtualization support: AMD-V (FX-8100) vs VT-x (Core i5-2500K). The Core i5-2500K includes integrated graphics (HD Graphics 3000), while the FX-8100 requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Core i5-2500K targets Gaming. Direct competitor: Core i5-2500K rivals FX-6300.
| Feature | FX-8100 | Core i5-2500K |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | No | Yes |
| IGPU Model | — | HD Graphics 3000 |
| Unlocked | Yes | Yes |
| AVX-512 | No | No |
| Virtualization | AMD-V | VT-x |
| Target Use | — | Gaming |
Value Analysis
The FX-8100 launched at $300 MSRP, while the Core i5-2500K debuted at $225. At current prices ($50 vs $35), the Core i5-2500K is $15 cheaper. In terms of value (PassMark points per dollar), the FX-8100 delivers 81.9 pts/$ vs 118.3 pts/$ for the Core i5-2500K — making the Core i5-2500K the 36.4% better value option.
| Feature | FX-8100 | Core i5-2500K |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $300 | $225-25% |
| Avg Price (30d) | $50 | $35-30% |
| Performance per Dollar | 81.9 | 118.3+44% |
| Release Date | 2011 | 2011 |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.
















