NVS 810 vs GeForce 6200

NVS 810

2015Core: 902 MHzBoost: 1033 MHz

GeForce 6200

2019Core: 937 MHzBoost: 1038 MHz

Performance Spectrum - GPU

NVS 810

1,192

+3121.6%

GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (móvel)

GeForce GTX 1070 (móvel)

GeForce RTX 2080 (móvel)

0.0%

GeForce GTX 1050 Mobile 3 GB

GeForce GTX 780 Ti

GeForce RTX 4050 Mobile

GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The NVS 810 is positioned at rank 309 and the GeForce 6200 is on rank 734, so the NVS 810 offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.•
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar NVS 810

#116

Radeon Pro SSG

MSRP: $6999|Avg: $1500

92%

#294

Tesla K20m

MSRP: $3199|Avg: $55

8690%

#309

NVS 810

MSRP: $700|Avg: $80

100%

#310

GRID P40-2Q

MSRP: $5699|Avg: $340

99%

#311

Quadro 2000D

MSRP: $599|Avg: $40

96%

#312

FirePro 3D V8800

MSRP: $1499|Avg: $30

96%

#313

Quadro K5000

MSRP: $2499|Avg: $60

94%

#314

Quadro 2000

MSRP: $599|Avg: $25

93%

#315

FirePro S7150

MSRP: $2399|Avg: $459

92%

#317

FirePro W9000

MSRP: $3999|Avg: $150

91%

#318

GRID M60-4Q

MSRP: $2500|Avg: $120

90%

#319

FirePro V8800

MSRP: $1499|Avg: $100

89%

#320

Quadro K6000

MSRP: $5265|Avg: $300

89%

#321

NVS 510

MSRP: $449|Avg: $15

89%

#322

GRID M60-1Q

MSRP: $2500|Avg: $50

87%

#323

GRID K280Q

MSRP: $2000|Avg: $50

84%

#324

FirePro M2000

MSRP: $300|Avg: $50

84%

Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Per Dollar GeForce 6200

#724

Radeon RX 550X (móvel)

MSRP: $35|Avg: $35

37438%

#726

GeForce GTX 1070 with Max-Q Design

MSRP: N/A|Avg: $150

33938%

#727

GeForce GTX 1060 with Max-Q Design

MSRP: N/A|Avg: $100

33848%

#731

GeForce GTX 1050 (Mobile)

MSRP: N/A|Avg: $50

30779%

#732

Radeon RX 6300

MSRP: $60|Avg: $40

30569%

#734

GeForce 6200

MSRP: $129|Avg: $10

100%

#736

GeForce FX 5500

MSRP: $37|Avg: $30

76%

#737

RADEON 9500

MSRP: $179|Avg: $30

69%

#738

MOBILITY RADEON 9800

MSRP: $229|Avg: $25

69%

#739

RADEON X850 XT

MSRP: $499|Avg: $50

55%

#740

RADEON 9800

MSRP: $399|Avg: $399

52%

#742

RADEON 9000

MSRP: $49|Avg: $20

34%

#743

RADEON 9200 SE

MSRP: $30|Avg: $15

34%

#744

MOBILITY RADEON 7500

MSRP: $49|Avg: $15

28%

#745

MOBILITY RADEON 9200

MSRP: $49|Avg: $15

21%

#746

MOBILITY RADEON 9000

MSRP: $50|Avg: $5

21%

#747

GeForce4 MX 420

MSRP: $99|Avg: $10

17%

#748

RADEON 9250

MSRP: $79|Avg: $25

14%

#749

RADEON 9200

MSRP: $99|Avg: $25

14%

Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Comparison

About G3D Mark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

⚠️ Generational Difference

The GeForce 6200 uses modern memory architecture. The GeForce 6200 likely supports modern features like Ray Tracing, Tensor Cores, and DLSS/FSR upscaling, which act as force multipliers for performance. The NVS 810 lacks this hardware feature set, limiting its longevity in modern titles despite any raw power similarities.

🚀 Performance Leadership

The NVS 810 is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 3121.6% higher G3D Mark score and 1500% more VRAM (4 GB vs 256 MB). This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the GeForce 6200.

Insight	NVS 810	GeForce 6200
Performance	✅Leading raw performance (+3121.6%)	❌Lower raw frame rates (-3121.6%)
Longevity	🛑Obsolete Architecture (2015 / Maxwell (2014−2017))	Pascal (2016−2021) (14nm)
Ecosystem	Supports FSR Upscaling	Supports FSR Upscaling
VRAM	✅ More VRAM (+1500%)	❌ Less VRAM capacity
Efficiency	💡 Excellent Perf/Watt	⚡ Higher Power Consumption
Case Fit	📏 Compact / SFF Friendly	📏 Compact / SFF Friendly

💎 Value Proposition

The NVS 810 offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. Although it costs $80 (vs $10), its significant performance lead justifies the premium, offering 302.7% better value per dollar than the GeForce 6200.

Insight	NVS 810	GeForce 6200
Cost Efficiency	✅Better overall value (+302.7%)	❌Lower cost efficiency
Upfront Cost	⚠️Higher upfront cost ($80)	✅More affordable ($10)

Performance Check

Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.

Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

NVS 810 Benchmark Check

GeForce 6200 Benchmark Check

Check FPS for your specific build

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of NVS 810 and GeForce 6200

NVS 810

The NVS 810 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in November 4 2015. It features the Maxwell architecture. The core clock ranges from 902 MHz to 1033 MHz. It has 512 ×2 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 68W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,192 points.

GeForce 6200

The GeForce 6200 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in February 20 2019. It features the Pascal architecture. The core clock ranges from 937 MHz to 1038 MHz. It has 384 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 10W. Manufactured using 14 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 37 points.

⚡

Graphics Performance

In G3D Mark, the NVS 810 scores 1,192 versus the GeForce 6200's 37 — the NVS 810 leads by 3121.6%. The NVS 810 is built on Maxwell while the GeForce 6200 uses Pascal, both on 28 nm vs 14 nm. Shader units: 512 (NVS 810) vs 384 (GeForce 6200). Raw compute: 1.058 TFLOPS ×2 (NVS 810) vs 0.7972 TFLOPS (GeForce 6200). Boost clocks: 1033 MHz vs 1038 MHz.

Feature	NVS 810	GeForce 6200
G3D Mark Score	1,192+3122%	37
Architecture	Maxwell	Pascal
Process Node	28 nm	14 nm
Shading Units	512 ×2+33%	384
Compute (TFLOPS)	1.058 TFLOPS ×2+33%	0.7972 TFLOPS
Boost Clock	1033 MHz	1038 MHz
ROPs	16 ×2	16
TMUs	32 ×2+33%	24
L1 Cache	256 KB+78%	144 KB
L2 Cache	1 MB+100%	0.5 MB

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

Feature	NVS 810	GeForce 6200
Upscaling Tech	FSR 1.0 (Software)	FSR 1.0 (Software)
Frame Generation	Not Supported	Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction	No	No
Low Latency	Standard	Standard

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The NVS 810 comes with 4 GB of VRAM, while the GeForce 6200 has 256 MB. The NVS 810 offers 1500% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 64-bit vs 128-bit. L2 Cache: 1 MB (NVS 810) vs 0.5 MB (GeForce 6200) — the NVS 810 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

Feature	NVS 810	GeForce 6200
VRAM Capacity	4 GB+1500%	0.25 GB
Memory Type	GDDR5	GDDR5
Bus Width	64-bit	128-bit+100%
L2 Cache	1 MB+100%	0.5 MB

🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 12 (12_1) (NVS 810) vs 9.0c (GeForce 6200). Vulkan: 1.3 vs None. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 2.1. Maximum simultaneous displays: 8 vs 2.

Feature	NVS 810	GeForce 6200
DirectX	12 (12_1)+33%	9.0c
Vulkan	1.3	None
OpenGL	4.6+119%	2.1
Max Displays	8+300%	2

🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: NVENC 5 (NVS 810) vs No (GeForce 6200). Decoder: NVDEC 2 vs PureVideo. Supported codecs: H.264,H.265 (NVS 810) vs MPEG-2 (GeForce 6200).

Feature	NVS 810	GeForce 6200
Encoder	NVENC 5	No
Decoder	NVDEC 2	PureVideo
Codecs	H.264,H.265	MPEG-2

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The NVS 810 draws 68W versus the GeForce 6200's 10W — a 148.7% difference. The GeForce 6200 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (NVS 810) vs 350W (GeForce 6200). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs Legacy. Card length: 198mm vs 168mm, occupying 1 vs 1 slots. Typical load temperature: 80°C vs 65°C.

Feature	NVS 810	GeForce 6200
TDP	68W	10W-85%
Recommended PSU	350W	350W
Power Connector	PCIe-powered	Legacy
Length	198mm	168mm
Height	111mm	100mm
Slots	1	1
Temp (Load)	80°C	65°C-19%
Perf/Watt	17.5+373%	3.7

💰

Value Analysis

The NVS 810 launched at $700 MSRP and currently averages $80, while the GeForce 6200 launched at $129 and now averages $10. The GeForce 6200 costs 87.5% less ($70 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 14.9 (NVS 810) vs 3.7 (GeForce 6200) — the NVS 810 offers 302.7% better value. The GeForce 6200 is the newer GPU (2019 vs 2015).