NVS 810 vs GeForce 830A

NVS 810

2015Core: 902 MHzBoost: 1033 MHz

GeForce 830A

2014Core: 1082 MHzBoost: 1150 MHz

Performance Spectrum - GPU

NVS 810

1,192

+1.6%

GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (móvel)

GeForce GTX 1070 (móvel)

GeForce RTX 2080 (móvel)

GeForce RTX 4060

GeForce 830A

1,173

0.0%

GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (móvel)

GeForce GTX 1070 (móvel)

GeForce RTX 2080 (móvel)

GeForce RTX 4060

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The NVS 810 is positioned at rank 309 and the GeForce 830A is on rank 344, so the NVS 810 offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.•
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar NVS 810

#116

Radeon Pro SSG

MSRP: $6999|Avg: $1500

92%

#294

Tesla K20m

MSRP: $3199|Avg: $55

8690%

#309

NVS 810

MSRP: $700|Avg: $80

100%

#310

GRID P40-2Q

MSRP: $5699|Avg: $340

99%

#311

Quadro 2000D

MSRP: $599|Avg: $40

96%

#312

FirePro 3D V8800

MSRP: $1499|Avg: $30

96%

#313

Quadro K5000

MSRP: $2499|Avg: $60

94%

#314

Quadro 2000

MSRP: $599|Avg: $25

93%

#315

FirePro S7150

MSRP: $2399|Avg: $459

92%

#317

FirePro W9000

MSRP: $3999|Avg: $150

91%

#318

GRID M60-4Q

MSRP: $2500|Avg: $120

90%

#319

FirePro V8800

MSRP: $1499|Avg: $100

89%

#320

Quadro K6000

MSRP: $5265|Avg: $300

89%

#321

NVS 510

MSRP: $449|Avg: $15

89%

#322

GRID M60-1Q

MSRP: $2500|Avg: $50

87%

#323

GRID K280Q

MSRP: $2000|Avg: $50

84%

#324

FirePro M2000

MSRP: $300|Avg: $50

84%

Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Per Dollar GeForce 830A

#334

Radeon RX 550X (móvel)

MSRP: $35|Avg: $35

926%

#336

GeForce GTX 1070 with Max-Q Design

MSRP: N/A|Avg: $150

839%

#337

GeForce GTX 1060 with Max-Q Design

MSRP: N/A|Avg: $100

837%

#341

GeForce GTX 1050 (Mobile)

MSRP: N/A|Avg: $50

761%

#342

Radeon RX 6300

MSRP: $60|Avg: $40

756%

#344

GeForce 830A

MSRP: $100|Avg: $30

100%

#348

GeForce MX350

MSRP: $250|Avg: $200

96%

#349

GeForce 840A

MSRP: $100|Avg: $25

95%

#350

Radeon R9 M295X Mac Edition

MSRP: $450|Avg: $450

95%

#351

HD Graphics 630

MSRP: $100|Avg: $30

95%

#354

Radeon R7 M370

MSRP: $130|Avg: $40

93%

#357

Radeon 625

MSRP: $100|Avg: $50

92%

#359

Radeon R7 M350

MSRP: $100|Avg: $100

91%

Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Comparison

About G3D Mark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

🚀 Performance Leadership

The NVS 810 is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 1.6% higher G3D Mark score and 700% more VRAM (4 GB vs 512 MB). This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the GeForce 830A.

Insight	NVS 810	GeForce 830A
Performance	✅Leading raw performance (+1.6%)	❌Lower raw frame rates (-1.6%)
Longevity	🛑Obsolete Architecture (2015 / Maxwell (2014−2017))	🛑Obsolete Architecture (2014 / Maxwell (2014−2017))
Ecosystem	Supports FSR Upscaling	Supports FSR Upscaling
VRAM	✅ More VRAM (+700%)	❌ Less VRAM capacity
Efficiency	⚡ Higher Power Consumption	💡 Excellent Perf/Watt
Case Fit	📏 Compact / SFF Friendly	—

💎 Value Proposition

The GeForce 830A offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. While both GPUs are considered legacy components by modern standards, the GeForce 830A holds the technical lead. Priced at $30 (vs $80), it costs 63% less, resulting in a 162.4% higher cost efficiency score.

Insight	NVS 810	GeForce 830A
Cost Efficiency	❌Lower cost efficiency	✅Better overall value (+162.4%)
Upfront Cost	⚠️Higher upfront cost ($80)	✅More affordable ($30)

Performance Check

Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.

Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

NVS 810 Benchmark Check

GeForce 830A Benchmark Check

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of NVS 810 and GeForce 830A

NVS 810

The NVS 810 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in November 4 2015. It features the Maxwell architecture. The core clock ranges from 902 MHz to 1033 MHz. It has 512 ×2 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 68W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,192 points.

GeForce 830A

The GeForce 830A is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in July 22 2014. It features the Maxwell architecture. The core clock ranges from 1082 MHz to 1150 MHz. It has 256 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 33W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,173 points.

⚡

Graphics Performance

The NVS 810 scores 1,192 and the GeForce 830A reaches 1,173 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 1.6% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The NVS 810 is built on Maxwell while the GeForce 830A uses Maxwell, both on a 28 nm process. Shader units: 512 (NVS 810) vs 256 (GeForce 830A). Raw compute: 1.058 TFLOPS ×2 (NVS 810) vs 0.5888 TFLOPS (GeForce 830A). Boost clocks: 1033 MHz vs 1150 MHz.

Feature	NVS 810	GeForce 830A
G3D Mark Score	1,192+2%	1,173
Architecture	Maxwell	Maxwell
Process Node	28 nm	28 nm
Shading Units	512 ×2+100%	256
Compute (TFLOPS)	1.058 TFLOPS ×2+80%	0.5888 TFLOPS
Boost Clock	1033 MHz	1150 MHz+11%
ROPs	16 ×2+100%	8
TMUs	32 ×2+100%	16
L1 Cache	256 KB+100%	128 KB
L2 Cache	1 MB	1 MB

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

Feature	NVS 810	GeForce 830A
Upscaling Tech	FSR 1.0 (Software)	FSR 1.0 (Software)
Frame Generation	Not Supported	Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction	No	No
Low Latency	Standard	Standard

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The NVS 810 comes with 4 GB of VRAM, while the GeForce 830A has 512 MB. The NVS 810 offers 700% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 64-bit vs 128-bit.

Feature	NVS 810	GeForce 830A
VRAM Capacity	4 GB+700%	0.5 GB
Memory Type	GDDR5	GDDR5
Bus Width	64-bit	128-bit+100%
L2 Cache	1 MB	1 MB

🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 12 (12_1) (NVS 810) vs 12 (11_0) (GeForce 830A). Vulkan: 1.3 vs 1.1. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 8 vs 2.

Feature	NVS 810	GeForce 830A
DirectX	12 (12_1)	12 (11_0)
Vulkan	1.3+18%	1.1
OpenGL	4.6	4.6
Max Displays	8+300%	2

🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: NVENC 5 (NVS 810) vs NVENC 3.0 (GeForce 830A). Decoder: NVDEC 2 vs VP6. Supported codecs: H.264,H.265 (NVS 810) vs H.264,MPEG-2,VC-1 (GeForce 830A).

Feature	NVS 810	GeForce 830A
Encoder	NVENC 5	NVENC 3.0
Decoder	NVDEC 2	VP6
Codecs	H.264,H.265	H.264,MPEG-2,VC-1

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The NVS 810 draws 68W versus the GeForce 830A's 33W — a 69.3% difference. The GeForce 830A is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (NVS 810) vs 350W (GeForce 830A). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs Legacy. Card length: 198mm vs 0mm, occupying 1 vs 0 slots. Typical load temperature: 80°C vs 80.

Feature	NVS 810	GeForce 830A
TDP	68W	33W-51%
Recommended PSU	350W	350W
Power Connector	PCIe-powered	Legacy
Length	198mm	0mm
Height	111mm	0mm
Slots	1	0-100%
Temp (Load)	80°C	80
Perf/Watt	17.5	35.5+103%

💰

Value Analysis

The NVS 810 launched at $700 MSRP and currently averages $80, while the GeForce 830A launched at $100 and now averages $30. The GeForce 830A costs 62.5% less ($50 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 14.9 (NVS 810) vs 39.1 (GeForce 830A) — the GeForce 830A offers 162.4% better value. The NVS 810 is the newer GPU (2015 vs 2014).