NVS 810 vs Quadro FX 5800

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

NVS 810 vs Quadro FX 5800 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

NVS 810 vs Quadro FX 5800: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

NVS 810

2015

Why buy it

✅Costs $2,799 less on MSRP ($700 MSRP vs $3,499 MSRP).
✅Delivers 392% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 1.7 vs 0.3 G3D/$ ($700 MSRP vs $3,499 MSRP).
✅Draws 68W instead of 189W, a 121W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌2015 hardware with 4 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.

Quadro FX 5800

2008

Why buy it

✅Competitive enough if your priority is price, power, or specific feature preference.

Trade-offs

❌2008 hardware with 4 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
❌
399.9% HIGHER MSRP
$3,499 MSRPvs$700 MSRP
❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0.3 vs 1.7 G3D/$ ($3,499 MSRP vs $700 MSRP).
❌177.9% higher power demand at 189W vs 68W.

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?

Quadro FX 5800 is the faster gaming card right now based on the synthetic data we have. It leads by 1.6% in PassMark G3D (1,211 vs 1,192), which is the best performance signal available in this matchup.

Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?

NVS 810 is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond. The case is simple: a 28nm process instead of 55nm and a newer 2015 generation instead of 2008. That makes it the less risky pick as game demands keep moving.

Which GPU is the better buy today?

NVS 810 makes the most sense to buy today. It is $2,799 cheaper on MSRP at $700 vs $3,499, and it leads G3D-per-dollar by 392% (1.7 vs 0.3), which is enough to swing the recommendation its way. Quadro FX 5800 still makes more sense if max raw gaming performance matters more than value.

NVS 810 vs Quadro FX 5800 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

NVS 810

The NVS 810 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in November 4 2015. It features the Maxwell architecture. The core clock ranges from 902 MHz to 1033 MHz. It has 512 ×2 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 68W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,192 points.

Quadro FX 5800

The Quadro FX 5800 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in November 11 2008. It features the Tesla 2.0 architecture. The core clock speed is 610 MHz. It has 240 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 189W. Manufactured using 55 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,211 points. Launch price was $3,499.

⚡

Graphics Performance

The NVS 810 scores 1,192 and the Quadro FX 5800 reaches 1,211 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 1.6% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The NVS 810 is built on Maxwell while the Quadro FX 5800 uses Tesla 2.0, both on 28 nm vs 55 nm. Shader units: 512 (NVS 810) vs 240 (Quadro FX 5800). Raw compute: 1.058 TFLOPS ×2 (NVS 810) vs 0.6221 TFLOPS (Quadro FX 5800).

Feature	NVS 810	Quadro FX 5800
G3D Mark Score	1,192	1,211+2%
Architecture	Maxwell	Tesla 2.0
Process Node	28 nm	55 nm
Shading Units	512 ×2+113%	240
Compute (TFLOPS)	1.058 TFLOPS ×2+70%	0.6221 TFLOPS
ROPs	16 ×2	32+100%
TMUs	32 ×2	80+150%
L2 Cache	1 MB+300%	0.25 MB

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

Feature	NVS 810	Quadro FX 5800
Upscaling Tech	Upscaling support	Upscaling support
Frame Generation	Not Supported	Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction	No	No
Low Latency	Standard	Standard

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

Both cards ship with 4 GB of GDDR5. Memory bus width is 64-bit on the NVS 810 and 64-bit on the Quadro FX 5800. L2 Cache: 1 MB (NVS 810) vs 0.25 MB (Quadro FX 5800) — the NVS 810 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

Feature	NVS 810	Quadro FX 5800
VRAM Capacity	4 GB	4 GB
Memory Type	GDDR5	GDDR5
Bus Width	64-bit	64-bit
L2 Cache	1 MB+300%	0.25 MB

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The NVS 810 draws 68W versus the Quadro FX 5800's 189W — a 94.2% difference. The NVS 810 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (NVS 810) vs 350W (Quadro FX 5800). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs PCIe-powered.

Feature	NVS 810	Quadro FX 5800
TDP	68W-64%	189W
Recommended PSU	350W	350W
Power Connector	PCIe-powered	PCIe-powered
Length	198mm	—
Height	111mm	—
Slots	1	—
Temp (Load)	80°C	—
Perf/Watt	17.5+173%	6.4

💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the NVS 810 came in at $700, while the Quadro FX 5800 launched at $3499. On MSRP, NVS 810 was 80% cheaper ($2799 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 1.7 (NVS 810) vs 0.3 (Quadro FX 5800) — the NVS 810 offers 466.7% better value. The newer card here is NVS 810 (2015 vs 2008).

Feature	NVS 810	Quadro FX 5800
MSRP	$700-80%	$3499
Performance per Dollar	1.7+467%	0.3
Codename	GM107	GT200B
Release	November 4 2015	November 11 2008
Ranking	#826	#815

Search NVS 810 on Amazon

Search Quadro FX 5800 on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.