NVS 810 vs Radeon R9 M270X

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

NVS 810 vs Radeon R9 M270X FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

NVS 810 vs Radeon R9 M270X: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

NVS 810

2015

Why buy it

✅More future proof: Maxwell (2014−2017) on 28nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.

Trade-offs

❌2015 hardware with 4 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
❌
180% HIGHER MSRP
$700 MSRPvs$250 MSRP
❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 1.7 vs 4.8 G3D/$ ($700 MSRP vs $250 MSRP).

Radeon R9 M270X

2014

Why buy it

✅Costs $450 less on MSRP ($250 MSRP vs $700 MSRP).
✅Delivers 182.8% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 4.8 vs 1.7 G3D/$ ($250 MSRP vs $700 MSRP).

Trade-offs

❌2014 hardware with 4 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?

Radeon R9 M270X is the faster gaming card right now based on the synthetic data we have. It leads by 1% in PassMark G3D (1,204 vs 1,192), which is the best performance signal available in this matchup.

Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?

NVS 810 is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond. The case is simple: a newer 2015 generation instead of 2014. That makes it the less risky pick as game demands keep moving.

Which GPU is the better buy today?

Radeon R9 M270X makes the most sense to buy today. It is $450 cheaper on MSRP at $250 vs $700, and it leads G3D-per-dollar by 182.8% (4.8 vs 1.7), so the value case lines up with the gaming result. If you are mainly targeting 1080p and some 1440p, Radeon R9 M270X is the easier value choice. If you care more about 1080p and some 1440p headroom, NVS 810 has the stronger long-term case.

NVS 810 vs Radeon R9 M270X Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

NVS 810

The NVS 810 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in November 4 2015. It features the Maxwell architecture. The core clock ranges from 902 MHz to 1033 MHz. It has 512 ×2 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 68W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,192 points.

Radeon R9 M270X

The Radeon R9 M270X is manufactured by AMD. It was released in March 21 2014. It features the GCN 1.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 725 MHz to 775 MHz. It has 640 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 75W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,204 points.

⚡

Graphics Performance

The NVS 810 scores 1,192 and the Radeon R9 M270X reaches 1,204 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 1% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The NVS 810 is built on Maxwell while the Radeon R9 M270X uses GCN 1.0, both on a 28 nm process. Shader units: 512 (NVS 810) vs 640 (Radeon R9 M270X). Raw compute: 1.058 TFLOPS ×2 (NVS 810) vs 0.992 TFLOPS (Radeon R9 M270X). Boost clocks: 1033 MHz vs 775 MHz.

Feature	NVS 810	Radeon R9 M270X
G3D Mark Score	1,192	1,204+1%
Architecture	Maxwell	GCN 1.0
Process Node	28 nm	28 nm
Shading Units	512 ×2	640+25%
Compute (TFLOPS)	1.058 TFLOPS ×2+7%	0.992 TFLOPS
Boost Clock	1033 MHz+33%	775 MHz
ROPs	16 ×2	16
TMUs	32 ×2	40+25%
L1 Cache	256 KB+60%	160 KB
L2 Cache	1 MB+300%	0.25 MB

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

Feature	NVS 810	Radeon R9 M270X
Upscaling Tech	Upscaling support	FSR Upscaling / FSR 4
Frame Generation	Not Supported	Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction	No	No
Low Latency	Standard	AMD Anti-Lag

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

Both cards ship with 4 GB of GDDR5. Memory bus width is 64-bit on the NVS 810 and 128-bit on the Radeon R9 M270X. L2 Cache: 1 MB (NVS 810) vs 0.25 MB (Radeon R9 M270X) — the NVS 810 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

Feature	NVS 810	Radeon R9 M270X
VRAM Capacity	4 GB	4 GB
Memory Type	GDDR5	GDDR5
Bus Width	64-bit	128-bit+100%
L2 Cache	1 MB+300%	0.25 MB

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The NVS 810 draws 68W versus the Radeon R9 M270X's 75W — a 9.8% difference. The NVS 810 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (NVS 810) vs 350W (Radeon R9 M270X). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs Mobile.

Feature	NVS 810	Radeon R9 M270X
TDP	68W-9%	75W
Recommended PSU	350W	350W
Power Connector	PCIe-powered	Mobile
Length	198mm	—
Height	111mm	—
Slots	1	—
Temp (Load)	80°C	—
Perf/Watt	17.5+9%	16.1

💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the NVS 810 came in at $700, while the Radeon R9 M270X launched at $250. On MSRP, Radeon R9 M270X was 64.3% cheaper ($450 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 1.7 (NVS 810) vs 4.8 (Radeon R9 M270X) — the Radeon R9 M270X offers 182.4% better value. The newer card here is NVS 810 (2015 vs 2014).

Feature	NVS 810	Radeon R9 M270X
MSRP	$700	$250-64%
Performance per Dollar	1.7	4.8+182%
Codename	GM107	Venus
Release	November 4 2015	March 21 2014
Ranking	#826	#819

Search NVS 810 on Amazon

Search Radeon R9 M270X on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.