
NVS 810
Popular choices:

Radeon Ryzen 7 3700U
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The NVS 810 is positioned at rank 309 and the Radeon Ryzen 7 3700U is on rank 278, so the Radeon Ryzen 7 3700U offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar NVS 810
Performance Per Dollar Radeon Ryzen 7 3700U
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
The Radeon Ryzen 7 3700U is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 2.1% higher G3D Mark score. However, the NVS 810 offers more VRAM, which may be beneficial for texture-heavy scenarios at higher resolutions.
| Insight | NVS 810 | Radeon Ryzen 7 3700U |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-2.1%) | ✅Leading raw performance (+2.1%) |
| Longevity | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2015 / Maxwell (2014−2017)) | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2015 / GCN 1.0 (2012−2020)) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | ✅ More VRAM (+700%) | ❌ Less VRAM capacity |
| Efficiency | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption |
| Case Fit | 📏 Compact / SFF Friendly | — |
💎 Value Proposition
The NVS 810 offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. While both GPUs are considered legacy components by modern standards, the NVS 810 holds the technical lead. Priced at $80 (vs $350), it costs 77% less, resulting in a 328.5% higher cost efficiency score.
| Insight | NVS 810 | Radeon Ryzen 7 3700U |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ✅Better overall value (+328.5%) | ❌Lower cost efficiency |
| Upfront Cost | ✅More affordable ($80) | ⚠️Higher upfront cost ($350) |
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of NVS 810 and Radeon Ryzen 7 3700U

NVS 810
The NVS 810 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in November 4 2015. It features the Maxwell architecture. The core clock ranges from 902 MHz to 1033 MHz. It has 512 ×2 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 68W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,192 points.

Radeon Ryzen 7 3700U
The Radeon Ryzen 7 3700U is manufactured by AMD. It was released in June 18 2015. It features the GCN 1.0 architecture. The boost clock speed is 975 MHz. It has 1024 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 100W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,217 points. Launch price was $149.
Graphics Performance
The NVS 810 scores 1,192 and the Radeon Ryzen 7 3700U reaches 1,217 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 2.1% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The NVS 810 is built on Maxwell while the Radeon Ryzen 7 3700U uses GCN 1.0, both on a 28 nm process. Shader units: 512 (NVS 810) vs 1,024 (Radeon Ryzen 7 3700U). Raw compute: 1.058 TFLOPS ×2 (NVS 810) vs 1.997 TFLOPS (Radeon Ryzen 7 3700U). Boost clocks: 1033 MHz vs 975 MHz.
| Feature | NVS 810 | Radeon Ryzen 7 3700U |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 1,192 | 1,217+2% |
| Architecture | Maxwell | GCN 1.0 |
| Process Node | 28 nm | 28 nm |
| Shading Units | 512 ×2 | 1024+100% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 1.058 TFLOPS ×2 | 1.997 TFLOPS+89% |
| Boost Clock | 1033 MHz+6% | 975 MHz |
| ROPs | 16 ×2 | 32+100% |
| TMUs | 32 ×2 | 64+100% |
| L1 Cache | 256 KB | 256 KB |
| L2 Cache | 1 MB+100% | 0.5 MB |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | NVS 810 | Radeon Ryzen 7 3700U |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | FSR 1.0 (Software) |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | Standard | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The NVS 810 comes with 4 GB of VRAM, while the Radeon Ryzen 7 3700U has 512 MB. The NVS 810 offers 700% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 64-bit vs System. L2 Cache: 1 MB (NVS 810) vs 0.5 MB (Radeon Ryzen 7 3700U) — the NVS 810 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | NVS 810 | Radeon Ryzen 7 3700U |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 4 GB+700% | 0.5 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | Shared |
| Bus Width | 64-bit | System |
| L2 Cache | 1 MB+100% | 0.5 MB |
Power & Dimensions
The NVS 810 draws 68W versus the Radeon Ryzen 7 3700U's 100W — a 38.1% difference. The NVS 810 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (NVS 810) vs 350W (Radeon Ryzen 7 3700U). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs None.
| Feature | NVS 810 | Radeon Ryzen 7 3700U |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 68W-32% | 100W |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 350W |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | None |
| Length | 198mm | — |
| Height | 111mm | — |
| Slots | 1 | — |
| Temp (Load) | 80°C | — |
| Perf/Watt | 17.5+43% | 12.2 |
Value Analysis
The NVS 810 launched at $700 MSRP and currently averages $80, while the Radeon Ryzen 7 3700U launched at $350 and now averages $350. The NVS 810 costs 77.1% less ($270 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 14.9 (NVS 810) vs 3.5 (Radeon Ryzen 7 3700U) — the NVS 810 offers 325.7% better value.
| Feature | NVS 810 | Radeon Ryzen 7 3700U |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $700 | $350-50% |
| Avg Price (30d) | $80-77% | $350 |
| Performance per Dollar | 14.9+326% | 3.5 |
| Codename | GM107 | Trinidad |
| Release | November 4 2015 | June 18 2015 |
| Ranking | #826 | #467 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.



















