Chipversus Index
Jump to Section

FirePro 3D V8700 vs NVS 810

CPUCPUGPUGPU

FirePro 3D V8700

2014Core: 850 MHz
Buy on Amazon
VS

NVS 810

2015Core: 902 MHzBoost: 1033 MHz
Buy on Amazon

FirePro 3D V8700 vs NVS 810 Performance Spectrum

FirePro 3D V8700
1 GB 274
1,206
+1.2%
brand logoRadeon HD 2900 XT
brand logoRadeon R7 PRO A10-9700
brand logoRadeon HD 6750M
brand logoRadeon R7 M460
brand logoRadeon RX 5500M
brand logoRadeon RX 7600M
brand logoRadeon RX 6700S
brand logoRadeon RX 6700 XT
NVS 810
4 GB 68
1,192
0.0%
brand logoGeForce GT 530
brand logoGeForce GT 740M
brand logoGeForce GT 640M
brand logoGeForce 930M
brand logoGeForce GTX 1050 Ti (móvel)
brand logoGeForce GTX 1070 (móvel)
brand logoGeForce RTX 2080 (Mobile)
brand logoGeForce RTX 4060

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

FirePro 3D V8700 vs NVS 810: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

FirePro 3D V8700

2014

Why buy it

  • ✅Competitive enough if your priority is price, power, or specific feature preference.

Trade-offs

  • ❌Less VRAM, with 1 GB vs 4 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
  • ❌2014 hardware with 1 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
  • ❌
    114.1% HIGHER MSRP
    $1,499 MSRPvs$700 MSRP
  • ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0.8 vs 1.7 G3D/$ ($1,499 MSRP vs $700 MSRP).
  • ❌302.9% higher power demand at 274W vs 68W.

NVS 810

2015

Why buy it

  • ✅Costs $799 less on MSRP ($700 MSRP vs $1,499 MSRP).
  • ✅Delivers 111.7% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 1.7 vs 0.8 G3D/$ ($700 MSRP vs $1,499 MSRP).
  • ✅300% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (4 GB vs 1 GB).
  • ✅Draws 68W instead of 274W, a 206W reduction.
  • ✅Measures 198mm instead of 254mm, a 56mm shorter card that is more SFF-friendly.

Trade-offs

  • ❌2015 hardware with 4 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
FirePro 3D V8700 is the faster gaming card right now based on the synthetic data we have. It leads by 1.2% in PassMark G3D (1,206 vs 1,192), which is the best performance signal available in this matchup.
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
FirePro 3D V8700 is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond because it comes out ahead on the available hardware-headroom signals for this matchup.
Which GPU is the better buy today?
NVS 810 makes the most sense to buy today. It is $799 cheaper on MSRP at $700 vs $1,499, and it leads G3D-per-dollar by 111.7% (1.7 vs 0.8), which is enough to swing the recommendation its way. If you are mainly targeting 1080p and some 1440p, NVS 810 is the easier value choice. If you care more about 1080p and some 1440p headroom, FirePro 3D V8700 has the stronger long-term case.

FirePro 3D V8700 vs NVS 810 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

AMD

FirePro 3D V8700

The FirePro 3D V8700 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in January 18 2014. It features the GCN 1.0 architecture. The core clock speed is 850 MHz. It has 2048 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 274W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,206 points.

NVIDIA

NVS 810

The NVS 810 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in November 4 2015. It features the Maxwell architecture. The core clock ranges from 902 MHz to 1033 MHz. It has 512 ×2 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 68W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,192 points.

⚡

Graphics Performance

The FirePro 3D V8700 scores 1,206 and the NVS 810 reaches 1,192 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 1.2% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The FirePro 3D V8700 is built on GCN 1.0 while the NVS 810 uses Maxwell, both on a 28 nm process. Shader units: 2,048 (FirePro 3D V8700) vs 512 (NVS 810). Raw compute: 3.482 TFLOPS (FirePro 3D V8700) vs 1.058 TFLOPS ×2 (NVS 810).

FeatureFirePro 3D V8700NVS 810
G3D Mark Score
1,206+1%
1,192
Architecture
GCN 1.0
Maxwell
Process Node
28 nm
28 nm
Shading Units
2048+300%
512 ×2
Compute (TFLOPS)
3.482 TFLOPS+229%
1.058 TFLOPS ×2
ROPs
32+100%
16 ×2
TMUs
128+300%
32 ×2
L1 Cache
512 KB+100%
256 KB
L2 Cache
0.75 MB
1 MB+33%
✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

FeatureFirePro 3D V8700NVS 810
Upscaling Tech
Upscaling support
Upscaling support
Frame Generation
Not Supported
Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction
No
No
Low Latency
Standard
Standard
💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The FirePro 3D V8700 has 1 GB of VRAM, while the NVS 810 carries 4 GB. NVS 810 gives you 300% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is 64-bit on the FirePro 3D V8700 and 64-bit on the NVS 810. L2 Cache: 0.75 MB (FirePro 3D V8700) vs 1 MB (NVS 810) — the NVS 810 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

FeatureFirePro 3D V8700NVS 810
VRAM Capacity
1 GB
4 GB+300%
Memory Type
GDDR5
GDDR5
Bus Width
64-bit
64-bit
L2 Cache
0.75 MB
1 MB+33%
🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 10.1 (FirePro 3D V8700) vs 12 (12_1) (NVS 810). Vulkan: None vs 1.3. OpenGL: 3.3 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 2 vs 8.

FeatureFirePro 3D V8700NVS 810
DirectX
10.1
12 (12_1)+19%
Vulkan
None
1.3
OpenGL
3.3
4.6+39%
Max Displays
2
8+300%
🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: UVD 2 (FirePro 3D V8700) vs NVENC 5 (NVS 810). Decoder: UVD 2 vs NVDEC 2. Supported codecs: MPEG-2,H.264,VC-1 (FirePro 3D V8700) vs H.264,H.265 (NVS 810).

FeatureFirePro 3D V8700NVS 810
Encoder
UVD 2
NVENC 5
Decoder
UVD 2
NVDEC 2
Codecs
MPEG-2,H.264,VC-1
H.264,H.265
🔌

Power & Dimensions

The FirePro 3D V8700 draws 274W versus the NVS 810's 68W — a 120.5% difference. The NVS 810 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (FirePro 3D V8700) vs 350W (NVS 810). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 254mm vs 198mm, occupying 2 vs 1 slots. Typical load temperature: 70°C vs 80°C.

FeatureFirePro 3D V8700NVS 810
TDP
274W
68W-75%
Recommended PSU
350W
350W
Power Connector
PCIe-powered
PCIe-powered
Length
254mm
198mm
Height
111mm
111mm
Slots
2
1-50%
Temp (Load)
70°C-13%
80°C
Perf/Watt
4.4
17.5+298%
💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the FirePro 3D V8700 came in at $1499, while the NVS 810 launched at $700. On MSRP, NVS 810 was 53.3% cheaper ($799 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 0.8 (FirePro 3D V8700) vs 1.7 (NVS 810) — the NVS 810 offers 112.5% better value. The newer card here is NVS 810 (2015 vs 2014).

FeatureFirePro 3D V8700NVS 810
MSRP
$1499
$700-53%
Performance per Dollar
0.8
1.7+112%
Codename
Tahiti
GM107
Release
January 18 2014
November 4 2015
Ranking
#423
#826
Search FirePro 3D V8700 on AmazonSearch NVS 810 on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.