
NVS 810 vs Radeon R5 430 OEM

NVS 810
Popular choices:

Radeon R5 430 OEM
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The NVS 810 is positioned at rank 309 and the Radeon R5 430 OEM is on rank 1, so the Radeon R5 430 OEM offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar NVS 810
Performance Per Dollar Radeon R5 430 OEM
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
The Radeon R5 430 OEM is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 0.7% higher G3D Mark score. However, the NVS 810 offers more VRAM, which may be beneficial for texture-heavy scenarios at higher resolutions.
| Insight | NVS 810 | Radeon R5 430 OEM |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-0.7%) | ✅Leading raw performance (+0.7%) |
| Longevity | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2015 / Maxwell (2014−2017)) | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2016 / GCN 1.0 (2012−2020)) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | ✅ More VRAM (+700%) | ❌ Less VRAM capacity |
| Efficiency | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt |
| Case Fit | 📏 Compact / SFF Friendly | — |
💎 Value Proposition
The Radeon R5 430 OEM offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. While both GPUs are considered legacy components by modern standards, the Radeon R5 430 OEM holds the technical lead. Priced at $13 (vs $80), it costs 84% less, resulting in a 519.5% higher cost efficiency score.
| Insight | NVS 810 | Radeon R5 430 OEM |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ❌Lower cost efficiency | ✅Better overall value (+519.5%) |
| Upfront Cost | ⚠️Higher upfront cost ($80) | ✅More affordable ($13) |
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of NVS 810 and Radeon R5 430 OEM

NVS 810
The NVS 810 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in November 4 2015. It features the Maxwell architecture. The core clock ranges from 902 MHz to 1033 MHz. It has 512 ×2 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 68W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,192 points.

Radeon R5 430 OEM
The Radeon R5 430 OEM is manufactured by AMD. It was released in June 30 2016. It features the GCN 1.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 730 MHz to 780 MHz. It has 384 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 50W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,200 points.
Graphics Performance
The NVS 810 scores 1,192 and the Radeon R5 430 OEM reaches 1,200 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 0.7% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The NVS 810 is built on Maxwell while the Radeon R5 430 OEM uses GCN 1.0, both on a 28 nm process. Shader units: 512 (NVS 810) vs 384 (Radeon R5 430 OEM). Raw compute: 1.058 TFLOPS ×2 (NVS 810) vs 0.599 TFLOPS (Radeon R5 430 OEM). Boost clocks: 1033 MHz vs 780 MHz.
| Feature | NVS 810 | Radeon R5 430 OEM |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 1,192 | 1,200 |
| Architecture | Maxwell | GCN 1.0 |
| Process Node | 28 nm | 28 nm |
| Shading Units | 512 ×2+33% | 384 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 1.058 TFLOPS ×2+77% | 0.599 TFLOPS |
| Boost Clock | 1033 MHz+32% | 780 MHz |
| ROPs | 16 ×2+100% | 8 |
| TMUs | 32 ×2+33% | 24 |
| L1 Cache | 256 KB+167% | 96 KB |
| L2 Cache | 1 MB+300% | 0.25 MB |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | NVS 810 | Radeon R5 430 OEM |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | FSR 1.0 (Software) |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | Standard | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The NVS 810 comes with 4 GB of VRAM, while the Radeon R5 430 OEM has 512 MB. The NVS 810 offers 700% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 64-bit vs System. L2 Cache: 1 MB (NVS 810) vs 0.25 MB (Radeon R5 430 OEM) — the NVS 810 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | NVS 810 | Radeon R5 430 OEM |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 4 GB+700% | 0.5 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | Shared |
| Bus Width | 64-bit | System |
| L2 Cache | 1 MB+300% | 0.25 MB |
Power & Dimensions
The NVS 810 draws 68W versus the Radeon R5 430 OEM's 50W — a 30.5% difference. The Radeon R5 430 OEM is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (NVS 810) vs 250W (Radeon R5 430 OEM). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs None.
| Feature | NVS 810 | Radeon R5 430 OEM |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 68W | 50W-26% |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 250W-29% |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | None |
| Length | 198mm | — |
| Height | 111mm | — |
| Slots | 1 | — |
| Temp (Load) | 80°C | — |
| Perf/Watt | 17.5 | 24.0+37% |
Value Analysis
The Radeon R5 430 OEM costs 83.8% less ($67 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 14.9 (NVS 810) vs 92.3 (Radeon R5 430 OEM) — the Radeon R5 430 OEM offers 519.5% better value. The Radeon R5 430 OEM is the newer GPU (2016 vs 2015).
| Feature | NVS 810 | Radeon R5 430 OEM |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $700 | — |
| Avg Price (30d) | $80 | $13-84% |
| Performance per Dollar | 14.9 | 92.3+519% |
| Codename | GM107 | Oland |
| Release | November 4 2015 | June 30 2016 |
| Ranking | #826 | #874 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
















