GeForce GTX 460M vs NVS 810

NVIDIA

GeForce GTX 460M

2010Core: 675 MHz
Similar parts
·······
VS

NVS 810

2015Core: 902 MHzBoost: 1033 MHz
Similar parts
·······

GeForce GTX 460M vs NVS 810 Performance Spectrum

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

GeForce GTX 460M vs NVS 810: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

GeForce GTX 460M

2010

Why buy it

  • Draws 50W instead of 68W, a 18W reduction.

Trade-offs

  • Less VRAM, with 2 GB vs 4 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
  • 2010 hardware with 2 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
  • Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 1.7 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $700 MSRP).

NVS 810

2015

Why buy it

  • Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 1.7 vs 0 G3D/$ ($700 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
  • 166.7% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (4 GB vs 2 GB).
  • More future proof: Maxwell (2014−2017) on 28nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.

Trade-offs

  • 2015 hardware with 4 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
  • 36% higher power demand at 68W vs 50W.

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
GeForce GTX 460M is the faster gaming card right now based on the synthetic data we have. It leads by 2.2% in PassMark G3D (1,218 vs 1,192), which is the best performance signal available in this matchup.
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
GeForce GTX 460M is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond because it comes out ahead on the available hardware-headroom signals for this matchup.
Which GPU is the better buy today?
NVS 810 makes the most sense today based on the pricing and value data we have for this matchup. If you are mainly targeting 1080p and some 1440p, NVS 810 is the easier value choice. If you care more about 1080p and some 1440p headroom, GeForce GTX 460M has the stronger long-term case.

GeForce GTX 460M vs NVS 810 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

NVIDIA

GeForce GTX 460M

The GeForce GTX 460M is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in September 3 2010. It features the Fermi architecture. The core clock speed is 675 MHz. It has 192 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 50W. Manufactured using 40 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,218 points.

NVIDIA

NVS 810

The NVS 810 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in November 4 2015. It features the Maxwell architecture. The core clock ranges from 902 MHz to 1033 MHz. It has 512 ×2 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 68W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,192 points.

Graphics Performance

The GeForce GTX 460M scores 1,218 and the NVS 810 reaches 1,192 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 2.2% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GeForce GTX 460M is built on Fermi while the NVS 810 uses Maxwell, both on 40 nm vs 28 nm. Shader units: 192 (GeForce GTX 460M) vs 512 (NVS 810). Raw compute: 0.5184 TFLOPS (GeForce GTX 460M) vs 1.058 TFLOPS ×2 (NVS 810).

FeatureGeForce GTX 460MNVS 810
G3D Mark Score
1,218+2%
1,192
Architecture
Fermi
Maxwell
Process Node
40 nm
28 nm
Shading Units
192
512 ×2+167%
Compute (TFLOPS)
0.5184 TFLOPS
1.058 TFLOPS ×2+104%
ROPs
24+50%
16 ×2
TMUs
32
32 ×2
L1 Cache
256 KB
256 KB
L2 Cache
0.38 MB
1 MB+163%

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

The GeForce GTX 460M gets NVIDIA DLSS, which still tends to look cleaner in motion. The NVS 810 leans on FSR, which is flexible and widely supported, but usually a bit rougher at the same settings.

FeatureGeForce GTX 460MNVS 810
Upscaling Tech
Upscaling support
Upscaling support
Frame Generation
Not Supported
Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction
No
No
Low Latency
NVIDIA Reflex
Standard
💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The GeForce GTX 460M has 2 GB of VRAM, while the NVS 810 carries 4 GB. NVS 810 gives you 166.7% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is 128-bit on the GeForce GTX 460M and 64-bit on the NVS 810. L2 Cache: 0.38 MB (GeForce GTX 460M) vs 1 MB (NVS 810) — the NVS 810 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

FeatureGeForce GTX 460MNVS 810
VRAM Capacity
1.5 GB
4 GB+167%
Memory Type
GDDR5
GDDR5
Bus Width
128-bit+100%
64-bit
L2 Cache
0.38 MB
1 MB+163%
🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 12 (11_0) (GeForce GTX 460M) vs 12 (12_1) (NVS 810). Vulkan: 1.2 vs 1.3. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 2 vs 8.

FeatureGeForce GTX 460MNVS 810
DirectX
12 (11_0)
12 (12_1)
Vulkan
1.2
1.3+8%
OpenGL
4.6
4.6
Max Displays
2
8+300%
🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: PureVideo HD VP4 (GeForce GTX 460M) vs NVENC 5 (NVS 810). Decoder: PureVideo HD VP4 vs NVDEC 2. Supported codecs: H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2,MPEG-4 ASP (GeForce GTX 460M) vs H.264,H.265 (NVS 810).

FeatureGeForce GTX 460MNVS 810
Encoder
PureVideo HD VP4
NVENC 5
Decoder
PureVideo HD VP4
NVDEC 2
Codecs
H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2,MPEG-4 ASP
H.264,H.265
🔌

Power & Dimensions

The GeForce GTX 460M draws 50W versus the NVS 810's 68W — a 30.5% difference. The GeForce GTX 460M is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (GeForce GTX 460M) vs 350W (NVS 810). Power connectors: 1x 6-pin vs PCIe-powered. Typical load temperature: 80°C vs 80°C.

FeatureGeForce GTX 460MNVS 810
TDP
50W-26%
68W
Recommended PSU
350W
350W
Power Connector
1x 6-pin
PCIe-powered
Length
198mm
Height
111mm
Slots
0-100%
1
Temp (Load)
80°C
80°C
Perf/Watt
24.4+39%
17.5
💰

Value Analysis

The newer card here is NVS 810 (2015 vs 2010).

FeatureGeForce GTX 460MNVS 810
MSRP
$700
Codename
GF106
GM107
Release
September 3 2010
November 4 2015
Ranking
#814
#826

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.