GeForce GTX 460M vs GeForce GTX 760A

NVIDIA

GeForce GTX 460M

2010Core: 675 MHz
VS
NVIDIA

GeForce GTX 760A

2014Core: 628 MHzBoost: 657 MHz

GeForce GTX 460M vs GeForce GTX 760A Performance Spectrum

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

GeForce GTX 460M vs GeForce GTX 760A FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

GeForce GTX 460M vs GeForce GTX 760A: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

GeForce GTX 460M

2010

Why buy it

  • 200% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (2 GB vs 512 MB).

Trade-offs

  • Lower average FPS than GeForce GTX 760A across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
  • 2010 hardware with 2 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
  • Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 4.9 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $249 MSRP).

GeForce GTX 760A

2014

Why buy it

  • 41.4% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
  • Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 4.9 vs 0 G3D/$ ($249 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
  • More future proof: Kepler (2012−2018) on 28nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.

Trade-offs

  • Less VRAM, with 512 MB vs 2 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
  • 2014 hardware with 512 MB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
GeForce GTX 760A is the faster gaming card right now. In our data, it leads by 41.4% in average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data and by 0.7% in PassMark G3D (1,226 vs 1,218), so the answer here is pretty clean.
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
GeForce GTX 460M is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond. The case is simple: 2 GB vs 512 MB of VRAM. That gives it more room for heavier textures and higher settings over time.
Which GPU is the better buy today?
GeForce GTX 760A makes the most sense today based on the pricing and value data we have for this matchup. If you are mainly targeting 1080p and some 1440p, GeForce GTX 760A is the easier value choice. If you care more about 1080p and some 1440p headroom, GeForce GTX 460M has the stronger long-term case.

GeForce GTX 460M vs GeForce GTX 760A Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

NVIDIA

GeForce GTX 460M

The GeForce GTX 460M is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in September 3 2010. It features the Fermi architecture. The core clock speed is 675 MHz. It has 192 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 50W. Manufactured using 40 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,218 points.

NVIDIA

GeForce GTX 760A

The GeForce GTX 760A is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in March 17 2014. It features the Kepler architecture. The core clock ranges from 628 MHz to 657 MHz. It has 768 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 55W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,226 points.

Graphics Performance

The GeForce GTX 460M scores 1,218 and the GeForce GTX 760A reaches 1,226 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 0.7% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GeForce GTX 460M is built on Fermi while the GeForce GTX 760A uses Kepler, both on 40 nm vs 28 nm. Shader units: 192 (GeForce GTX 460M) vs 768 (GeForce GTX 760A). Raw compute: 0.5184 TFLOPS (GeForce GTX 460M) vs 1.009 TFLOPS (GeForce GTX 760A).

FeatureGeForce GTX 460MGeForce GTX 760A
G3D Mark Score
1,218
1,226
Architecture
Fermi
Kepler
Process Node
40 nm
28 nm
Shading Units
192
768+300%
Compute (TFLOPS)
0.5184 TFLOPS
1.009 TFLOPS+95%
ROPs
24+50%
16
TMUs
32
64+100%
L1 Cache
256 KB+300%
64 KB
L2 Cache
384 KB+50%
256 KB

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

FeatureGeForce GTX 460MGeForce GTX 760A
Upscaling Tech
Upscaling support
Upscaling support
Frame Generation
Not Supported
Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction
No
No
Low Latency
NVIDIA Reflex
NVIDIA Reflex
💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The GeForce GTX 460M has 2 GB of VRAM, while the GeForce GTX 760A carries 512 MB. GeForce GTX 460M gives you 200% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is 128-bit on the GeForce GTX 460M and 128-bit on the GeForce GTX 760A. L2 Cache: 384 KB (GeForce GTX 460M) vs 256 KB (GeForce GTX 760A) — the GeForce GTX 460M has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

FeatureGeForce GTX 460MGeForce GTX 760A
VRAM Capacity
1.5 GB+200%
0.5 GB
Memory Type
GDDR5
GDDR5
Memory Bandwidth
Unknown
Unknown
Bus Width
128-bit
128-bit
L2 Cache
384 KB+50%
256 KB
🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 12 (11_0) (GeForce GTX 460M) vs 12 (11_0) (GeForce GTX 760A). Vulkan: 1.2 vs 1.2. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 2 vs 4.

FeatureGeForce GTX 460MGeForce GTX 760A
DirectX
12 (11_0)
12 (11_0)
Vulkan
1.2
1.2
OpenGL
4.6
4.6
Max Displays
2
4+100%
🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: PureVideo HD VP4 (GeForce GTX 460M) vs NVENC 1st Gen (GeForce GTX 760A). Decoder: PureVideo HD VP4 vs PureVideo HD VP5. Supported codecs: H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2,MPEG-4 ASP (GeForce GTX 460M) vs H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2,MPEG-4 ASP (GeForce GTX 760A).

FeatureGeForce GTX 460MGeForce GTX 760A
Encoder
PureVideo HD VP4
NVENC 1st Gen
Decoder
PureVideo HD VP4
PureVideo HD VP5
Codecs
H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2,MPEG-4 ASP
H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2,MPEG-4 ASP
🔌

Power & Dimensions

The GeForce GTX 460M draws 50W versus the GeForce GTX 760A's 55W — a 9.5% difference. The GeForce GTX 460M is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (GeForce GTX 460M) vs 350W (GeForce GTX 760A). Power connectors: 1x 6-pin vs 1x 6-pin. Typical load temperature: 80°C vs 85°C.

FeatureGeForce GTX 460MGeForce GTX 760A
TDP
50W-9%
55W
Recommended PSU
350W
350W
Power Connector
1x 6-pin
1x 6-pin
Slots
0
0
Temp (Load)
80°C-6%
85°C
Perf/Watt
24.4+9%
22.3
💰

Value Analysis

The newer card here is GeForce GTX 760A (2014 vs 2010).

FeatureGeForce GTX 460MGeForce GTX 760A
MSRP
$249
Codename
GF106
GK106
Release
September 3 2010
March 17 2014
Ranking
#814
#813

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.