GeForce GTX 460M
VS
Radeon Ryzen 7 3700U

GeForce GTX 460M vs Radeon Ryzen 7 3700U

NVIDIA

GeForce GTX 460M

2010Core: 675 MHz
VS
AMD

Radeon Ryzen 7 3700U

2015Boost: 975 MHz

Performance Spectrum - GPU

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The GeForce GTX 460M is positioned at rank 181 and the Radeon Ryzen 7 3700U is on rank 278, so the GeForce GTX 460M offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar GeForce GTX 460M

#171
Radeon RX 550X (móvel)
MSRP: $35|Avg: $35
357%
#173
323%
#174
322%
#178
GeForce GTX 1050 (Mobile)
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $50
293%
#179
Radeon RX 6300
MSRP: $60|Avg: $40
291%
#181
GeForce GTX 460M
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $40
100%
#182
Radeon 6750M
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $25
100%
#183
GeForce GT 525M
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $30
99%
#185
Radeon R5 (Bristol Ridge)
MSRP: $50|Avg: $50
99%
#187
GeForce MX550
MSRP: $150|Avg: $150
98%
#195
GeForce GT625M
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $45
92%
Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Per Dollar Radeon Ryzen 7 3700U

#1
GeForce RTX 3060 Ti
MSRP: $399|Avg: $280
2084%
#2
GeForce RTX 5060
MSRP: $299|Avg: $299
2003%
#3
Radeon RX 5600 XT
MSRP: $279|Avg: $180
1979%
#4
Radeon RX 9060
MSRP: $249|Avg: $249
1976%
#5
GeForce RTX 5050
MSRP: $249|Avg: $249
1972%
#6
GeForce RTX 3050 OEM
MSRP: $249|Avg: $150
1961%
#7
Arc A580
MSRP: $179|Avg: $179
1936%
#8
Radeon RX 9060 XT
MSRP: $299|Avg: $299
1929%
#9
Radeon RX 9060 XT 8GB
MSRP: $299|Avg: $299
1911%
#10
Radeon RX 7600
MSRP: $269|Avg: $250
1906%
#11
Radeon RX 6600
MSRP: $329|Avg: $180
1883%
#12
GeForce RTX 4060
MSRP: $299|Avg: $299
1879%
#13
Arc B570
MSRP: $219|Avg: $219
1845%
#14
Arc B580
MSRP: $249|Avg: $249
1844%
#263
Radeon R5 430 OEM
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $13
2299%
#278
Radeon Ryzen 7 3700U
MSRP: $350|Avg: $350
100%
#279
Radeon R4
MSRP: $100|Avg: $20
99%
#281
Radeon R7 A10-8750
MSRP: $250|Avg: $30
98%
#282
Radeon HD 6410D
MSRP: $70|Avg: $70
97%
#284
Radeon HD 3850 AGP
MSRP: $130|Avg: $130
95%
#285
Radeon R9 M280X
MSRP: $250|Avg: $50
94%
#286
Radeon HD 5470
MSRP: $83|Avg: $83
93%
#287
GeForce GT 220
MSRP: $69|Avg: $49
93%
#288
Radeon R7 A10-8850
MSRP: $250|Avg: $250
89%
#290
GeForce G210
MSRP: $50|Avg: $15
85%
#291
Radeon HD 4850 X2
MSRP: $399|Avg: $40
82%
#292
Radeon HD 4330
MSRP: $50|Avg: $9
78%
#293
GeForce GTX 260
MSRP: $449|Avg: $449
77%
Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Comparison

About G3D Mark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

🚀 Performance Leadership

The GeForce GTX 460M is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 0.1% higher G3D Mark score and 200% more VRAM (2 GB vs 512 MB). This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the Radeon Ryzen 7 3700U.

InsightGeForce GTX 460MRadeon Ryzen 7 3700U
Performance
Leading raw performance (+0.1%)
Lower raw frame rates (-0.1%)
Longevity
🛑Obsolete Architecture (2010 / Fermi (2010−2014))
🛑Obsolete Architecture (2015 / GCN 1.0 (2012−2020))
Ecosystem
Supports FSR Upscaling
Supports FSR Upscaling
VRAM
✅ More VRAM (+200%)
❌ Less VRAM capacity
Efficiency
💡 Excellent Perf/Watt
⚡ Higher Power Consumption
Case Fit

💎 Value Proposition

The GeForce GTX 460M offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. While both GPUs are considered legacy components by modern standards, the GeForce GTX 460M holds the technical lead. Priced at $40 (vs $350), it costs 89% less, resulting in a 775.7% higher cost efficiency score.

InsightGeForce GTX 460MRadeon Ryzen 7 3700U
Cost Efficiency
Better overall value (+775.7%)
Lower cost efficiency
Upfront Cost
More affordable ($40)
⚠️Higher upfront cost ($350)

Performance Check

Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.

Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of GeForce GTX 460M and Radeon Ryzen 7 3700U

NVIDIA

GeForce GTX 460M

The GeForce GTX 460M is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in September 3 2010. It features the Fermi architecture. The core clock speed is 675 MHz. It has 192 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 50W. Manufactured using 40 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,218 points.

AMD

Radeon Ryzen 7 3700U

The Radeon Ryzen 7 3700U is manufactured by AMD. It was released in June 18 2015. It features the GCN 1.0 architecture. The boost clock speed is 975 MHz. It has 1024 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 100W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,217 points. Launch price was $149.

Graphics Performance

The GeForce GTX 460M scores 1,218 and the Radeon Ryzen 7 3700U reaches 1,217 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 0.1% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GeForce GTX 460M is built on Fermi while the Radeon Ryzen 7 3700U uses GCN 1.0, both on 40 nm vs 28 nm. Shader units: 192 (GeForce GTX 460M) vs 1,024 (Radeon Ryzen 7 3700U). Raw compute: 0.5184 TFLOPS (GeForce GTX 460M) vs 1.997 TFLOPS (Radeon Ryzen 7 3700U).

FeatureGeForce GTX 460MRadeon Ryzen 7 3700U
G3D Mark Score
1,218
1,217
Architecture
Fermi
GCN 1.0
Process Node
40 nm
28 nm
Shading Units
192
1024+433%
Compute (TFLOPS)
0.5184 TFLOPS
1.997 TFLOPS+285%
ROPs
24
32+33%
TMUs
32
64+100%
L1 Cache
256 KB
256 KB
L2 Cache
384 KB
512 KB+33%

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

FeatureGeForce GTX 460MRadeon Ryzen 7 3700U
Upscaling Tech
FSR 2.1 (Compatible)
FSR 1.0 (Software)
Frame Generation
FSR 3 (Compatible)
Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction
No
No
Low Latency
Standard
AMD Anti-Lag
💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The GeForce GTX 460M comes with 2 GB of VRAM, while the Radeon Ryzen 7 3700U has 512 MB. The GeForce GTX 460M offers 200% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 128-bit vs System. L2 Cache: 384 KB (GeForce GTX 460M) vs 512 KB (Radeon Ryzen 7 3700U) — the Radeon Ryzen 7 3700U has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

FeatureGeForce GTX 460MRadeon Ryzen 7 3700U
VRAM Capacity
1.5 GB+200%
0.5 GB
Memory Type
GDDR5
Shared
Memory Bandwidth
Unknown
System
Bus Width
128-bit
System
L2 Cache
384 KB
512 KB+33%
🔌

Power & Dimensions

The GeForce GTX 460M draws 50W versus the Radeon Ryzen 7 3700U's 100W — a 66.7% difference. The GeForce GTX 460M is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (GeForce GTX 460M) vs 350W (Radeon Ryzen 7 3700U). Power connectors: 1x 6-pin vs None.

FeatureGeForce GTX 460MRadeon Ryzen 7 3700U
TDP
50W-50%
100W
Recommended PSU
350W
350W
Power Connector
1x 6-pin
None
Slots
0
Temp (Load)
80°C
Perf/Watt
24.4+100%
12.2
💰

Value Analysis

The GeForce GTX 460M costs 88.6% less ($310 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 30.4 (GeForce GTX 460M) vs 3.5 (Radeon Ryzen 7 3700U) — the GeForce GTX 460M offers 768.6% better value. The Radeon Ryzen 7 3700U is the newer GPU (2015 vs 2010).

FeatureGeForce GTX 460MRadeon Ryzen 7 3700U
MSRP
$350
Avg Price (30d)
$40-89%
$350
Performance per Dollar
30.4+769%
3.5
Codename
GF106
Trinidad
Release
September 3 2010
June 18 2015
Ranking
#814
#467