GeForce GTX 460M vs Quadro FX 5800

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

GeForce GTX 460M vs Quadro FX 5800 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

GeForce GTX 460M vs Quadro FX 5800: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

GeForce GTX 460M

2010

Why buy it

✅Draws 50W instead of 189W, a 139W reduction.
✅More future proof: Fermi (2010−2014) on 40nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.

Trade-offs

❌Lower average FPS than Quadro FX 5800 across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
❌Less VRAM, with 2 GB vs 4 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
❌2010 hardware with 2 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 0.3 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $3,499 MSRP).

Quadro FX 5800

2008

Why buy it

✅50.2% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 0.3 vs 0 G3D/$ ($3,499 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
✅166.7% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (4 GB vs 2 GB).

Trade-offs

❌2008 hardware with 4 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
❌278% higher power demand at 189W vs 50W.

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?

Quadro FX 5800 is the faster gaming card right now. In our data, it leads by 50.2% in average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data. PassMark G3D leans toward GeForce GTX 460M instead at 1,218 vs 1,211, so for this question the real-game FPS result matters more than the synthetic split.

Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?

GeForce GTX 460M is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond. The case is simple: a 40nm process instead of 55nm and a newer 2010 generation instead of 2008. That makes it the less risky pick as game demands keep moving.

Which GPU is the better buy today?

Quadro FX 5800 makes the most sense today based on the pricing and value data we have for this matchup. If you are mainly targeting 1080p and some 1440p, Quadro FX 5800 is the easier value choice. If you care more about 1080p and some 1440p headroom, GeForce GTX 460M has the stronger long-term case.

GeForce GTX 460M vs Quadro FX 5800 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

GeForce GTX 460M

The GeForce GTX 460M is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in September 3 2010. It features the Fermi architecture. The core clock speed is 675 MHz. It has 192 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 50W. Manufactured using 40 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,218 points.

Quadro FX 5800

The Quadro FX 5800 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in November 11 2008. It features the Tesla 2.0 architecture. The core clock speed is 610 MHz. It has 240 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 189W. Manufactured using 55 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,211 points. Launch price was $3,499.

⚡

Graphics Performance

The GeForce GTX 460M scores 1,218 and the Quadro FX 5800 reaches 1,211 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 0.6% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GeForce GTX 460M is built on Fermi while the Quadro FX 5800 uses Tesla 2.0, both on 40 nm vs 55 nm. Shader units: 192 (GeForce GTX 460M) vs 240 (Quadro FX 5800). Raw compute: 0.5184 TFLOPS (GeForce GTX 460M) vs 0.6221 TFLOPS (Quadro FX 5800).

Feature	GeForce GTX 460M	Quadro FX 5800
G3D Mark Score	1,218	1,211
Architecture	Fermi	Tesla 2.0
Process Node	40 nm	55 nm
Shading Units	192	240+25%
Compute (TFLOPS)	0.5184 TFLOPS	0.6221 TFLOPS+20%
ROPs	24	32+33%
TMUs	32	80+150%
L2 Cache	384 KB+50%	256 KB

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

The GeForce GTX 460M gets NVIDIA DLSS, which still tends to look cleaner in motion. The Quadro FX 5800 leans on FSR, which is flexible and widely supported, but usually a bit rougher at the same settings.

Feature	GeForce GTX 460M	Quadro FX 5800
Upscaling Tech	Upscaling support	Upscaling support
Frame Generation	Not Supported	Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction	No	No
Low Latency	NVIDIA Reflex	Standard

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The GeForce GTX 460M has 2 GB of VRAM, while the Quadro FX 5800 carries 4 GB. Quadro FX 5800 gives you 166.7% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is 128-bit on the GeForce GTX 460M and 64-bit on the Quadro FX 5800. L2 Cache: 384 KB (GeForce GTX 460M) vs 256 KB (Quadro FX 5800) — the GeForce GTX 460M has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

Feature	GeForce GTX 460M	Quadro FX 5800
VRAM Capacity	1.5 GB	4 GB+167%
Memory Type	GDDR5	GDDR5
Bus Width	128-bit+100%	64-bit
L2 Cache	384 KB+50%	256 KB

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The GeForce GTX 460M draws 50W versus the Quadro FX 5800's 189W — a 116.3% difference. The GeForce GTX 460M is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (GeForce GTX 460M) vs 350W (Quadro FX 5800). Power connectors: 1x 6-pin vs PCIe-powered.

Feature	GeForce GTX 460M	Quadro FX 5800
TDP	50W-74%	189W
Recommended PSU	350W	350W
Power Connector	1x 6-pin	PCIe-powered
Slots	0	—
Temp (Load)	80°C	—
Perf/Watt	24.4+281%	6.4

💰

Value Analysis

The newer card here is GeForce GTX 460M (2010 vs 2008).

Feature	GeForce GTX 460M	Quadro FX 5800
MSRP	—	$3499
Codename	GF106	GT200B
Release	September 3 2010	November 11 2008
Ranking	#814	#815

Search GeForce GTX 460M on Amazon

Search Quadro FX 5800 on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.