NVS 810 vs FirePro V5800

NVS 810

2015Core: 902 MHzBoost: 1033 MHz

FirePro V5800

2010Core: 690 MHz

Performance Spectrum - GPU

NVS 810

1,192

+0.7%

GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (móvel)

GeForce GTX 1070 (móvel)

GeForce RTX 2080 (móvel)

GeForce RTX 4060

FirePro V5800

1,184

0.0%

Radeon HD 2900 XT

Radeon R7 A8-7680

Radeon R7 PRO A10-9700E

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The NVS 810 is positioned at rank 309 and the FirePro V5800 is on rank 269, so the FirePro V5800 offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.•
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar NVS 810

#116

Radeon Pro SSG

MSRP: $6999|Avg: $1500

92%

#294

Tesla K20m

MSRP: $3199|Avg: $55

8690%

#309

NVS 810

MSRP: $700|Avg: $80

100%

#310

GRID P40-2Q

MSRP: $5699|Avg: $340

99%

#311

Quadro 2000D

MSRP: $599|Avg: $40

96%

#312

FirePro 3D V8800

MSRP: $1499|Avg: $30

96%

#313

Quadro K5000

MSRP: $2499|Avg: $60

94%

#314

Quadro 2000

MSRP: $599|Avg: $25

93%

#315

FirePro S7150

MSRP: $2399|Avg: $459

92%

#317

FirePro W9000

MSRP: $3999|Avg: $150

91%

#318

GRID M60-4Q

MSRP: $2500|Avg: $120

90%

#319

FirePro V8800

MSRP: $1499|Avg: $100

89%

#320

Quadro K6000

MSRP: $5265|Avg: $300

89%

#321

NVS 510

MSRP: $449|Avg: $15

89%

#322

GRID M60-1Q

MSRP: $2500|Avg: $50

87%

#323

GRID K280Q

MSRP: $2000|Avg: $50

84%

#324

FirePro M2000

MSRP: $300|Avg: $50

84%

Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Per Dollar FirePro V5800

#108

Quadro M6000

MSRP: $4999|Avg: $500

95%

#109

Quadro M6000 24GB

MSRP: $4999|Avg: $600

94%

#254

Tesla K20m

MSRP: $3199|Avg: $55

5981%

#269

FirePro V5800

MSRP: $479|Avg: $15

100%

#270

FirePro 3D V7800

MSRP: $759|Avg: $40

100%

#271

FirePro S9050

MSRP: $1999|Avg: $1825

99%

#272

FirePro R5000

MSRP: $1099|Avg: $150

98%

#274

GRID M6-8Q

MSRP: $1500|Avg: $100

96%

#276

GRID K120Q

MSRP: $125|Avg: $20

95%

#278

Tesla M60

MSRP: $3000|Avg: $250

94%

#279

FirePro V7900

MSRP: $999|Avg: $120

91%

#280

GRID P6-4Q

MSRP: $2000|Avg: $150

89%

#281

GRID M60-8A

MSRP: $2500|Avg: $120

89%

#283

Quadro K4000

MSRP: $1269|Avg: $100

87%

Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Comparison

About G3D Mark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

🚀 Performance Leadership

The NVS 810 is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 0.7% higher G3D Mark score. This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the FirePro V5800.

Insight	NVS 810	FirePro V5800
Performance	✅Leading raw performance (+0.7%)	❌Lower raw frame rates (-0.7%)
Longevity	🛑Obsolete Architecture (2015 / Maxwell (2014−2017))	🛑Obsolete Architecture (2010 / TeraScale 2 (2009−2015))
Ecosystem	Supports FSR Upscaling	Supports FSR Upscaling
VRAM	❌ Less VRAM capacity	✅ More VRAM (+0%)
Efficiency	Normal Efficiency	Normal Efficiency
Case Fit	📏 Compact / SFF Friendly	📏 Compact / SFF Friendly

💎 Value Proposition

The FirePro V5800 offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. While both GPUs are considered legacy components by modern standards, the FirePro V5800 holds the technical lead. Priced at $15 (vs $80), it costs 81% less, resulting in a 429.8% higher cost efficiency score.

Insight	NVS 810	FirePro V5800
Cost Efficiency	❌Lower cost efficiency	✅Better overall value (+429.8%)
Upfront Cost	⚠️Higher upfront cost ($80)	✅More affordable ($15)

Performance Check

Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.

Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

NVS 810 Benchmark Check

FirePro V5800 Benchmark Check

Path of Exile 2

Path of Exile 2

No prediction data available

Counter-Strike 2

Counter-Strike 2

No prediction data available

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of NVS 810 and FirePro V5800

NVS 810

The NVS 810 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in November 4 2015. It features the Maxwell architecture. The core clock ranges from 902 MHz to 1033 MHz. It has 512 ×2 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 68W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,192 points.

FirePro V5800

The FirePro V5800 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in April 26 2010. It features the TeraScale 2 architecture. The core clock speed is 690 MHz. It has 800 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 74W. Manufactured using 40 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,184 points. Launch price was $479.

⚡

Graphics Performance

The NVS 810 scores 1,192 and the FirePro V5800 reaches 1,184 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 0.7% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The NVS 810 is built on Maxwell while the FirePro V5800 uses TeraScale 2, both on 28 nm vs 40 nm. Shader units: 512 (NVS 810) vs 800 (FirePro V5800). Raw compute: 1.058 TFLOPS ×2 (NVS 810) vs 1.104 TFLOPS (FirePro V5800).

Feature	NVS 810	FirePro V5800
G3D Mark Score	1,192	1,184
Architecture	Maxwell	TeraScale 2
Process Node	28 nm	40 nm
Shading Units	512 ×2	800+56%
Compute (TFLOPS)	1.058 TFLOPS ×2	1.104 TFLOPS+4%
ROPs	16 ×2	16
TMUs	32 ×2	40+25%
L1 Cache	256 KB+220%	80 KB
L2 Cache	1 MB+300%	0.25 MB

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

Feature	NVS 810	FirePro V5800
Upscaling Tech	FSR 1.0 (Software)	FSR 1.0 (Software)
Frame Generation	Not Supported	Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction	No	No
Low Latency	Standard	Standard

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

Both cards feature 4 GB of GDDR5. Bus width: 64-bit vs 64-bit. L2 Cache: 1 MB (NVS 810) vs 0.25 MB (FirePro V5800) — the NVS 810 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

Feature	NVS 810	FirePro V5800
VRAM Capacity	4 GB	4 GB
Memory Type	GDDR5	GDDR5
Bus Width	64-bit	64-bit
L2 Cache	1 MB+300%	0.25 MB

🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 12 (12_1) (NVS 810) vs 11.2 (FirePro V5800). Vulkan: 1.3 vs None. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.4. Maximum simultaneous displays: 8 vs 3.

Feature	NVS 810	FirePro V5800
DirectX	12 (12_1)+7%	11.2
Vulkan	1.3	None
OpenGL	4.6+5%	4.4
Max Displays	8+167%	3

🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: NVENC 5 (NVS 810) vs No (FirePro V5800). Decoder: NVDEC 2 vs UVD 2.3. Supported codecs: H.264,H.265 (NVS 810) vs H.264,MPEG-2,VC-1 (FirePro V5800).

Feature	NVS 810	FirePro V5800
Encoder	NVENC 5	No
Decoder	NVDEC 2	UVD 2.3
Codecs	H.264,H.265	H.264,MPEG-2,VC-1

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The NVS 810 draws 68W versus the FirePro V5800's 74W — a 8.5% difference. The NVS 810 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (NVS 810) vs 350W (FirePro V5800). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 198mm vs 229mm, occupying 1 vs 1 slots. Typical load temperature: 80°C vs 59°C.

Feature	NVS 810	FirePro V5800
TDP	68W-8%	74W
Recommended PSU	350W	350W
Power Connector	PCIe-powered	PCIe-powered
Length	198mm	229mm
Height	111mm	111mm
Slots	1	1
Temp (Load)	80°C	59°C-26%
Perf/Watt	17.5+9%	16.0

💰

Value Analysis

The NVS 810 launched at $700 MSRP and currently averages $80, while the FirePro V5800 launched at $479 and now averages $15. The FirePro V5800 costs 81.3% less ($65 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 14.9 (NVS 810) vs 78.9 (FirePro V5800) — the FirePro V5800 offers 429.5% better value. The NVS 810 is the newer GPU (2015 vs 2010).