NVS 810 vs GeForce GTX 460M

NVS 810

2015Core: 902 MHzBoost: 1033 MHz

GeForce GTX 460M

2010Core: 675 MHz

Performance Spectrum - GPU

NVS 810

1,192

0.0%

GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (móvel)

GeForce GTX 1070 (móvel)

GeForce RTX 2080 (móvel)

GeForce RTX 4060

GeForce GTX 460M

1,218

+2.2%

GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Mobile)

GeForce GTX 1070 (móvel)

GeForce RTX 2080 (móvel)

GeForce RTX 5070 Laptop GPU

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The NVS 810 is positioned at rank 309 and the GeForce GTX 460M is on rank 181, so the GeForce GTX 460M offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.•
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar NVS 810

#116

Radeon Pro SSG

MSRP: $6999|Avg: $1500

92%

#294

Tesla K20m

MSRP: $3199|Avg: $55

8690%

#309

NVS 810

MSRP: $700|Avg: $80

100%

#310

GRID P40-2Q

MSRP: $5699|Avg: $340

99%

#311

Quadro 2000D

MSRP: $599|Avg: $40

96%

#312

FirePro 3D V8800

MSRP: $1499|Avg: $30

96%

#313

Quadro K5000

MSRP: $2499|Avg: $60

94%

#314

Quadro 2000

MSRP: $599|Avg: $25

93%

#315

FirePro S7150

MSRP: $2399|Avg: $459

92%

#317

FirePro W9000

MSRP: $3999|Avg: $150

91%

#318

GRID M60-4Q

MSRP: $2500|Avg: $120

90%

#319

FirePro V8800

MSRP: $1499|Avg: $100

89%

#320

Quadro K6000

MSRP: $5265|Avg: $300

89%

#321

NVS 510

MSRP: $449|Avg: $15

89%

#322

GRID M60-1Q

MSRP: $2500|Avg: $50

87%

#323

GRID K280Q

MSRP: $2000|Avg: $50

84%

#324

FirePro M2000

MSRP: $300|Avg: $50

84%

Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Per Dollar GeForce GTX 460M

#171

Radeon RX 550X (móvel)

MSRP: $35|Avg: $35

357%

#173

GeForce GTX 1070 with Max-Q Design

MSRP: N/A|Avg: $150

323%

#174

GeForce GTX 1060 with Max-Q Design

MSRP: N/A|Avg: $100

322%

#178

GeForce GTX 1050 (Mobile)

MSRP: N/A|Avg: $50

293%

#179

Radeon RX 6300

MSRP: $60|Avg: $40

291%

#181

GeForce GTX 460M

MSRP: N/A|Avg: $40

100%

#182

Radeon 6750M

MSRP: N/A|Avg: $25

100%

#183

GeForce GT 525M

MSRP: N/A|Avg: $30

99%

#185

Radeon R5 (Bristol Ridge)

MSRP: $50|Avg: $50

99%

#187

GeForce MX550

MSRP: $150|Avg: $150

98%

#195

GeForce GT625M

MSRP: N/A|Avg: $45

92%

Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Comparison

About G3D Mark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

🚀 Performance Leadership

The GeForce GTX 460M is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 2.2% higher G3D Mark score. However, the NVS 810 offers more VRAM, which may be beneficial for texture-heavy scenarios at higher resolutions.

Insight	NVS 810	GeForce GTX 460M
Performance	❌Lower raw frame rates (-2.2%)	✅Leading raw performance (+2.2%)
Longevity	🛑Obsolete Architecture (2015 / Maxwell (2014−2017))	🛑Obsolete Architecture (2010 / Fermi (2010−2014))
Ecosystem	Supports FSR Upscaling	Supports FSR Upscaling
VRAM	✅ More VRAM (+166.7%)	❌ Less VRAM capacity
Efficiency	⚡ Higher Power Consumption	💡 Excellent Perf/Watt
Case Fit	📏 Compact / SFF Friendly	—

💎 Value Proposition

The GeForce GTX 460M offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. While both GPUs are considered legacy components by modern standards, the GeForce GTX 460M holds the technical lead. Priced at $40 (vs $80), it costs 50% less, resulting in a 104.4% higher cost efficiency score.

Insight	NVS 810	GeForce GTX 460M
Cost Efficiency	❌Lower cost efficiency	✅Better overall value (+104.4%)
Upfront Cost	⚠️Higher upfront cost ($80)	✅More affordable ($40)

Performance Check

Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.

Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

NVS 810 Benchmark Check

GeForce GTX 460M Benchmark Check

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of NVS 810 and GeForce GTX 460M

NVS 810

The NVS 810 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in November 4 2015. It features the Maxwell architecture. The core clock ranges from 902 MHz to 1033 MHz. It has 512 ×2 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 68W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,192 points.

GeForce GTX 460M

The GeForce GTX 460M is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in September 3 2010. It features the Fermi architecture. The core clock speed is 675 MHz. It has 192 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 50W. Manufactured using 40 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,218 points.

⚡

Graphics Performance

The NVS 810 scores 1,192 and the GeForce GTX 460M reaches 1,218 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 2.2% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The NVS 810 is built on Maxwell while the GeForce GTX 460M uses Fermi, both on 28 nm vs 40 nm. Shader units: 512 (NVS 810) vs 192 (GeForce GTX 460M). Raw compute: 1.058 TFLOPS ×2 (NVS 810) vs 0.5184 TFLOPS (GeForce GTX 460M).

Feature	NVS 810	GeForce GTX 460M
G3D Mark Score	1,192	1,218+2%
Architecture	Maxwell	Fermi
Process Node	28 nm	40 nm
Shading Units	512 ×2+167%	192
Compute (TFLOPS)	1.058 TFLOPS ×2+104%	0.5184 TFLOPS
ROPs	16 ×2	24+50%
TMUs	32 ×2	32
L1 Cache	256 KB	256 KB
L2 Cache	1 MB+163%	0.38 MB

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

Feature	NVS 810	GeForce GTX 460M
Upscaling Tech	FSR 1.0 (Software)	FSR 2.1 (Compatible)
Frame Generation	Not Supported	FSR 3 (Compatible)
Ray Reconstruction	No	No
Low Latency	Standard	Standard

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The NVS 810 comes with 4 GB of VRAM, while the GeForce GTX 460M has 2 GB. The NVS 810 offers 166.7% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 64-bit vs 128-bit. L2 Cache: 1 MB (NVS 810) vs 0.38 MB (GeForce GTX 460M) — the NVS 810 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

Feature	NVS 810	GeForce GTX 460M
VRAM Capacity	4 GB+167%	1.5 GB
Memory Type	GDDR5	GDDR5
Bus Width	64-bit	128-bit+100%
L2 Cache	1 MB+163%	0.38 MB

🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 12 (12_1) (NVS 810) vs 12 (11_0) (GeForce GTX 460M). Vulkan: 1.3 vs 1.2. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 8 vs 2.

Feature	NVS 810	GeForce GTX 460M
DirectX	12 (12_1)	12 (11_0)
Vulkan	1.3+8%	1.2
OpenGL	4.6	4.6
Max Displays	8+300%	2

🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: NVENC 5 (NVS 810) vs PureVideo HD VP4 (GeForce GTX 460M). Decoder: NVDEC 2 vs PureVideo HD VP4. Supported codecs: H.264,H.265 (NVS 810) vs H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2,MPEG-4 ASP (GeForce GTX 460M).

Feature	NVS 810	GeForce GTX 460M
Encoder	NVENC 5	PureVideo HD VP4
Decoder	NVDEC 2	PureVideo HD VP4
Codecs	H.264,H.265	H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2,MPEG-4 ASP

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The NVS 810 draws 68W versus the GeForce GTX 460M's 50W — a 30.5% difference. The GeForce GTX 460M is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (NVS 810) vs 350W (GeForce GTX 460M). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs 1x 6-pin. Typical load temperature: 80°C vs 80°C.

Feature	NVS 810	GeForce GTX 460M
TDP	68W	50W-26%
Recommended PSU	350W	350W
Power Connector	PCIe-powered	1x 6-pin
Length	198mm	—
Height	111mm	—
Slots	1	0-100%
Temp (Load)	80°C	80°C
Perf/Watt	17.5	24.4+39%

💰

Value Analysis

The GeForce GTX 460M costs 50% less ($40 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 14.9 (NVS 810) vs 30.4 (GeForce GTX 460M) — the GeForce GTX 460M offers 104% better value. The NVS 810 is the newer GPU (2015 vs 2010).