NVS 810 vs Radeon RX 6300

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The NVS 810 is positioned at rank 309 and the Radeon RX 6300 is on rank 14, so the Radeon RX 6300 offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.•
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar NVS 810

#116

Radeon Pro SSG

MSRP: $6999|Avg: $1500

92%

#294

Tesla K20m

MSRP: $3199|Avg: $55

8690%

#309

NVS 810

MSRP: $700|Avg: $80

100%

#310

GRID P40-2Q

MSRP: $5699|Avg: $340

99%

#311

Quadro 2000D

MSRP: $599|Avg: $40

96%

#312

FirePro 3D V8800

MSRP: $1499|Avg: $30

96%

#313

Quadro K5000

MSRP: $2499|Avg: $60

94%

#314

Quadro 2000

MSRP: $599|Avg: $25

93%

#315

FirePro S7150

MSRP: $2399|Avg: $459

92%

#317

FirePro W9000

MSRP: $3999|Avg: $150

91%

#318

GRID M60-4Q

MSRP: $2500|Avg: $120

90%

#319

FirePro V8800

MSRP: $1499|Avg: $100

89%

#320

Quadro K6000

MSRP: $5265|Avg: $300

89%

#321

NVS 510

MSRP: $449|Avg: $15

89%

#322

GRID M60-1Q

MSRP: $2500|Avg: $50

87%

#323

GRID K280Q

MSRP: $2000|Avg: $50

84%

#324

FirePro M2000

MSRP: $300|Avg: $50

84%

Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Per Dollar Radeon RX 6300

#6

Radeon RX 550X (móvel)

MSRP: $35|Avg: $35

122%

#8

GeForce GTX 1070 with Max-Q Design

MSRP: N/A|Avg: $150

111%

#9

GeForce GTX 1060 with Max-Q Design

MSRP: N/A|Avg: $100

111%

#13

GeForce GTX 1050 (Mobile)

MSRP: N/A|Avg: $50

101%

#14

Radeon RX 6300

MSRP: $60|Avg: $40

100%

#18

Radeon RX 560X (móvel)

MSRP: $55|Avg: $55

98%

Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Comparison

About G3D Mark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

⚠️ Generational Difference

The Radeon RX 6300 is significantly newer (2022 vs 2015). The Radeon RX 6300 likely supports modern features like Ray Tracing, Tensor Cores, and DLSS/FSR upscaling, which act as force multipliers for performance. The NVS 810 lacks this hardware feature set, limiting its longevity in modern titles despite any raw power similarities.

🚀 Performance Leadership

The Radeon RX 6300 is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 346.2% higher G3D Mark score. This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the NVS 810.

Insight	NVS 810	Radeon RX 6300
Performance	❌Lower raw frame rates (-346.2%)	✅Leading raw performance (+346.2%)
Longevity	🛑Obsolete Architecture (2015 / Maxwell (2014−2017))	RDNA 2.0 (2020−2025) (6nm)
Ecosystem	Supports FSR Upscaling	Supports FSR Upscaling
VRAM	❌ Less VRAM capacity	✅ More VRAM (+0%)
Efficiency	⚡ Higher Power Consumption	💡 Excellent Perf/Watt
Case Fit	📏 Compact / SFF Friendly	📏 Compact / SFF Friendly

💎 Value Proposition

The Radeon RX 6300 offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. Priced at $40 versus $80 for the NVS 810, it costs 50% less. While it maintains basic entry-level capabilities, this results in a 792.4% higher cost efficiency score.

Insight	NVS 810	Radeon RX 6300
Cost Efficiency	❌Lower cost efficiency	✅Better overall value (+792.4%)
Upfront Cost	⚠️Higher upfront cost ($80)	✅More affordable ($40)

Performance Check

Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.

Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

NVS 810 Benchmark Check

Radeon RX 6300 Benchmark Check

Loading...

Check FPS for your specific build

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of NVS 810 and Radeon RX 6300

NVS 810

The NVS 810 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in November 4 2015. It features the Maxwell architecture. The core clock ranges from 902 MHz to 1033 MHz. It has 512 ×2 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 68W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,192 points.

Radeon RX 6300

The Radeon RX 6300 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in January 4 2022. It features the RDNA 2.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 2000 MHz to 2400 MHz. It has 768 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 35W. Manufactured using 6 nm process technology. It features 12 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 5,319 points.

⚡

Graphics Performance

In G3D Mark, the NVS 810 scores 1,192 versus the Radeon RX 6300's 5,319 — the Radeon RX 6300 leads by 346.2%. The NVS 810 is built on Maxwell while the Radeon RX 6300 uses RDNA 2.0, both on 28 nm vs 6 nm. Shader units: 512 (NVS 810) vs 768 (Radeon RX 6300). Raw compute: 1.058 TFLOPS ×2 (NVS 810) vs 3.686 TFLOPS (Radeon RX 6300). Boost clocks: 1033 MHz vs 2400 MHz.

Feature	NVS 810	Radeon RX 6300
G3D Mark Score	1,192	5,319+346%
Architecture	Maxwell	RDNA 2.0
Process Node	28 nm	6 nm
Shading Units	512 ×2	768+50%
Compute (TFLOPS)	1.058 TFLOPS ×2	3.686 TFLOPS+248%
Boost Clock	1033 MHz	2400 MHz+132%
ROPs	16 ×2	32+100%
TMUs	32 ×2	48+50%
L1 Cache	256 KB	256 KB
L2 Cache	1 MB	1 MB

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

A critical advantage for the Radeon RX 6300 is support for FSR 3 / AFMF. This allows it to generate entire frames using AI/Algorithms, essentially doubling the frame rate in CPU-bound scenarios or heavy ray-tracing titles. The NVS 810 lacks specific hardware/driver support for this native frame generation tier.

Feature	NVS 810	Radeon RX 6300
Upscaling Tech	FSR 1.0 (Software)	FSR 3 (Native)
Frame Generation	Not Supported	FSR 3 / AFMF (Driver)
Ray Reconstruction	No	No
Low Latency	Standard	AMD Anti-Lag

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

Both cards feature 4 GB of video memory. Bus width: 64-bit vs 32-bit.

Feature	NVS 810	Radeon RX 6300
VRAM Capacity	4 GB	4 GB
Memory Type	GDDR5	GDDR6
Bus Width	64-bit+100%	32-bit
L2 Cache	1 MB	1 MB

🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 12 (12_1) (NVS 810) vs 12_2 (Radeon RX 6300). Maximum simultaneous displays: 8 vs 2.

Feature	NVS 810	Radeon RX 6300
DirectX	12 (12_1)	12_2
Max Displays	8+300%	2

🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: NVENC 5 (NVS 810) vs VCN 3.0 (Radeon RX 6300). Decoder: NVDEC 2 vs VCN 3.0.

Feature	NVS 810	Radeon RX 6300
Encoder	NVENC 5	VCN 3.0
Decoder	NVDEC 2	VCN 3.0
Codecs	H.264,H.265	—

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The NVS 810 draws 68W versus the Radeon RX 6300's 35W — a 64.1% difference. The Radeon RX 6300 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (NVS 810) vs 300W (Radeon RX 6300). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 198mm vs 160mm, occupying 1 vs 1 slots.

Feature	NVS 810	Radeon RX 6300
TDP	68W	35W-49%
Recommended PSU	350W	300W-14%
Power Connector	PCIe-powered	PCIe-powered
Length	198mm	160mm
Height	111mm	—
Slots	1	1
Temp (Load)	80°C	—
Perf/Watt	17.5	152.0+769%

💰

Value Analysis

The NVS 810 launched at $700 MSRP and currently averages $80, while the Radeon RX 6300 launched at $60 and now averages $40. The Radeon RX 6300 costs 50% less ($40 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 14.9 (NVS 810) vs 133.0 (Radeon RX 6300) — the Radeon RX 6300 offers 792.6% better value. The Radeon RX 6300 is the newer GPU (2022 vs 2015).