FX-8120
VS
Xeon E5-4620

FX-8120 vs Xeon E5-4620

AMD

FX-8120

8 Cores8 Thrd125 WWMax: 4 GHz2011
VS
Intel

Xeon E5-4620

8 Cores16 Thrd130 WWMax: 2.6 GHz2012

Performance Spectrum - CPU

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The FX-8120 is positioned at rank 567 and the Xeon E5-4620 is on rank 1013, so the FX-8120 offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar FX-8120

#1
Ryzen 9 7950X
MSRP: $194|Avg: $20
9690%
#2
Core i9-10900T
MSRP: $120|Avg: $5
9156%
#3
Ryzen 3 PRO 4355GE
MSRP: $423|Avg: $5
6648%
#4
Ryzen Threadripper 3960X
MSRP: $1399|Avg: $85
2003%
#5
Ryzen 9 9950X
MSRP: $649|Avg: $129
1586%
#6
Ryzen 5 8400F
MSRP: $303|Avg: $55
1388%
#7
Ryzen 7 PRO 2700
MSRP: $299|Avg: $60
795%
#8
Ryzen 5 2600X
MSRP: $229|Avg: $55
784%
#9
Ryzen 3 PRO 5350G
MSRP: $150|Avg: $60
714%
#10
Core Ultra 5 245KF
MSRP: $294|Avg: $189
714%
#11
Ryzen 5 5500
MSRP: $159|Avg: $85
706%
#12
Ryzen 5 3600
MSRP: $199|Avg: $80
687%
#13
Core i3-9100E
MSRP: $202|Avg: $30
678%
#14
Core Ultra 5 245K
MSRP: $319|Avg: $200
675%
#15
Core i3-8300T
MSRP: $138|Avg: $25
669%
#567
FX-8120
MSRP: $205|Avg: $40
100%
#568
Core i3-7100T
MSRP: $117|Avg: $39
100%
#569
Pentium E2220
MSRP: $32|Avg: $32
100%
#571
Pentium G620T
MSRP: $64|Avg: $90
100%
#572
Pentium G4500T
MSRP: $75|Avg: $20
99%
#573
Core i5-7500
MSRP: $199|Avg: $65
99%
#574
Core i7-7700
MSRP: $272|Avg: $102
99%
#575
Celeron G1610T
MSRP: $42|Avg: $42
99%
#576
Athlon X4 750K
MSRP: $91|Avg: $17
98%
#577
Core i7-7700K
MSRP: $305|Avg: $140
98%
#578
Core i5-7600K
MSRP: $217|Avg: $84
98%
#579
FX-6300
MSRP: $132|Avg: $35
97%
#581
Core i3-6100T
MSRP: $117|Avg: $20
97%
#582
Athlon X4 970
MSRP: $85|Avg: $85
97%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Per Dollar Xeon E5-4620

#1
Xeon Platinum 8454H
MSRP: $6540|Avg: N/A
67040%
#6
Xeon Gold 6240R
MSRP: $2444|Avg: N/A
12658%
#10
Xeon 6337P
MSRP: $60|Avg: $5
11246%
#15
EPYC 9174F
MSRP: $194|Avg: $30
8688%
#541
Xeon E5-4669 v4
MSRP: $7007|Avg: $300
81%
#1013
Xeon E5-4620
MSRP: $2141|Avg: $400
100%
#1014
Xeon E5-2680
MSRP: $3226|Avg: $40
93%
#1016
Xeon E5-4640
MSRP: $2725|Avg: N/A
83%
#1018
Xeon E5-4650
MSRP: $3616|Avg: $71
77%
#1019
Xeon E5-4655 v4
MSRP: $4616|Avg: N/A
76%
#1020
Xeon E5-4650L
MSRP: $3616|Avg: N/A
76%
#1021
Xeon E-2224
MSRP: $3226|Avg: $195
72%
#1022
Athlon MP 2400+
MSRP: $151|Avg: $20
65%
#1023
Xeon E5-2640 v2
MSRP: $4115|Avg: $530
60%
#1024
Xeon E5-2650L v2
MSRP: $4115|Avg: $1078
60%
#1025
Opteron 142
MSRP: $292|Avg: $20
49%
#1026
Athlon MP 2800+
MSRP: $275|Avg: $10
45%
#1027
Xeon L3110
MSRP: $1000|Avg: $950
43%
#1028
Xeon 2.66
MSRP: $337|Avg: $10
43%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Comparison

About PassMark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

🚀 Performance Leadership

Use Case Distinction: This is a comparison between a Professional Workstation processor ($400) and a Consumer Desktop CPU. The Xeon E5-4620 is engineered for massive parallel workloads (rendering, scientific simulations), offering significantly higher core counts.
InsightFX-8120Xeon E5-4620
Gaming
Superior gaming performance
Lower gaming performance
Workstation
Weaker in multi-core tasks
Better multi-core power
Price
More affordable ($40)
⚠️ Higher cost ($400)
Longevity
🛑 Legacy (Zambezi (2011−2012) / 32 nm)
🛑 Legacy (Sandy Bridge-EP (2012) / 32 nm)

💎 Value Proposition

The FX-8120 ($40), however, is optimized for mixed workloads and gaming. For most users, it offers superior single-thread performance and responsiveness at a fraction of the cost ($360 less, 90% cheaper), making it the better choice for daily use and gaming.
InsightFX-8120Xeon E5-4620
Cost Efficiency
Better overall value (+894%)
Lower cost efficiency
Upfront Cost
More affordable ($40)
⚠️ Higher cost ($400)

Performance Check

Paired with RTX 4090

To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of FX-8120 and Xeon E5-4620

AMD

FX-8120

The FX-8120 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 12 October 2011 (14 years ago). It is based on the Zambezi (2011−2012) architecture. It features 8 cores and 8 threads. Base frequency is 3.1 GHz, with boost up to 4 GHz. L3 cache: 8192 kB. L2 cache: 8192 kB. Built on 32 nm process technology. Socket: AM3+. Thermal design power (TDP): 125 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 6,594 points. Launch price was $149.

Intel

Xeon E5-4620

The Xeon E5-4620 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 14 May 2012 (13 years ago). It is based on the Sandy Bridge-EP (2012) architecture. It features 8 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 2.2 GHz, with boost up to 2.6 GHz. L3 cache: 16384 kB (total). L2 cache: 256 kB (per core). Built on 32 nm process technology. Socket: LGA2011. Thermal design power (TDP): 95 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 6,635 points. Launch price was $400.

Processing Power

The FX-8120 packs 8 cores / 8 threads, matching the Xeon E5-4620's 8 cores. Boost clocks reach 4 GHz on the FX-8120 versus 2.6 GHz on the Xeon E5-4620 — a 42.4% clock advantage for the FX-8120 (base: 3.1 GHz vs 2.2 GHz). The FX-8120 uses the Zambezi (2011−2012) architecture (32 nm), while the Xeon E5-4620 uses Sandy Bridge-EP (2012) (32 nm). In PassMark, the FX-8120 scores 6,594 against the Xeon E5-4620's 6,635 — a 0.6% lead for the Xeon E5-4620. L3 cache: 8192 kB on the FX-8120 vs 16384 kB (total) on the Xeon E5-4620.

FeatureFX-8120Xeon E5-4620
Cores / Threads
8 / 8
8 / 16
Boost Clock
4 GHz+54%
2.6 GHz
Base Clock
3.1 GHz+41%
2.2 GHz
L3 Cache
8192 kB
16384 kB (total)+100%
L2 Cache
8192 kB+3100%
256 kB (per core)
Process
32 nm
32 nm
Architecture
Zambezi (2011−2012)
Sandy Bridge-EP (2012)
PassMark
6,594
6,635
🧠

Memory & Platform

The FX-8120 uses the AM3+ socket (PCIe 2.0), while the Xeon E5-4620 uses LGA2011 (PCIe 2.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

FeatureFX-8120Xeon E5-4620
Socket
AM3+
LGA2011
PCIe Generation
PCIe 2.0
PCIe 2.0
💰

Value Analysis

The FX-8120 launched at $205 MSRP, while the Xeon E5-4620 debuted at $2141. At current prices ($40 vs $400), the FX-8120 is $360 cheaper. In terms of value (PassMark points per dollar), the FX-8120 delivers 164.8 pts/$ vs 16.6 pts/$ for the Xeon E5-4620 — making the FX-8120 the 163.4% better value option.

FeatureFX-8120Xeon E5-4620
MSRP
$205-90%
$2141
Avg Price (30d)
$40-90%
$400
Performance per Dollar
164.8+893%
16.6
Release Date
2011
2012