
Core i3-9100F

FX-8120
Core i3-9100F vs FX-8120 Performance Spectrum
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Core i3-9100F vs FX-8120 FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Valorant

Among Us

Apex Legends

ARC Raiders

Baldur's Gate 3

Call of Duty: Black Ops 6
Core i3-9100F vs FX-8120: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.
Core i3-9100F
2019Why buy it
- ✅+1.7% higher PassMark.
- ✅Costs $108 less on MSRP ($97 MSRP vs $205 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 114.9% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 69.1 vs 32.2 PassMark/$ ($97 MSRP vs $205 MSRP).
- ✅Draws 65W instead of 125W, a 60W reduction.
- ✅100+% more PCIe lanes (16 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than FX-8120 across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (6 MB vs 8 MB).
FX-8120
2011Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +4.2% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅+33.3% larger total L3 cache (8 MB vs 6 MB).
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark (6,594 vs 6,704).
- ❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 32.2 vs 69.1 PassMark/$ ($205 MSRP vs $97 MSRP).
- ❌92.3% higher power demand at 125W vs 65W.
Quick Answers
So, is Core i3-9100F better than FX-8120?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Core i3-9100F vs FX-8120 Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Core i3-9100F
The Core i3-9100F is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 23 April 2019 (6 years ago). It is based on the Coffee Lake-R (2018−2019) architecture. It features 4 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 3.6 GHz, with boost up to 4.2 GHz. L3 cache: 6 MB (total). L2 cache: 256K (per core). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1151. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 6,704 points. Launch price was $122.

FX-8120
The FX-8120 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 12 October 2011 (14 years ago). It is based on the Zambezi (2011−2012) architecture. It features 8 cores and 8 threads. Base frequency is 3.1 GHz, with boost up to 4 GHz. L3 cache: 8192 kB. L2 cache: 8192 kB. Built on 32 nm process technology. Socket: AM3+. Thermal design power (TDP): 125 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 6,594 points. Launch price was $149.
Processing Power
The Core i3-9100F packs 4 cores / 4 threads, while the FX-8120 offers 8 cores / 8 threads — the FX-8120 has 4 more cores. Boost clocks reach 4.2 GHz on the Core i3-9100F versus 4 GHz on the FX-8120 — a 4.9% clock advantage for the Core i3-9100F (base: 3.6 GHz vs 3.1 GHz). The Core i3-9100F uses the Coffee Lake-R (2018−2019) architecture (14 nm), while the FX-8120 uses Zambezi (2011−2012) (32 nm). In PassMark, the Core i3-9100F scores 6,704 against the FX-8120's 6,594 — a 1.7% lead for the Core i3-9100F. L3 cache: 6 MB (total) on the Core i3-9100F vs 8192 kB on the FX-8120.
| Feature | Core i3-9100F | FX-8120 |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 4 / 4 | 8 / 8+100% |
| Boost Clock | 4.2 GHz+5% | 4 GHz |
| Base Clock | 3.6 GHz+16% | 3.1 GHz |
| L3 Cache | 6 MB (total) | 8192 kB+33% |
| L2 Cache | 256K (per core) | 8192 kB+3100% |
| Process | 14 nm-56% | 32 nm |
| Architecture | Coffee Lake-R (2018−2019) | Zambezi (2011−2012) |
| PassMark | 6,704+2% | 6,594 |
Memory & Platform
The Core i3-9100F uses the LGA1151 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the FX-8120 uses AM3+ (PCIe 2.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.
| Feature | Core i3-9100F | FX-8120 |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | LGA1151 | AM3+ |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 3.0+50% | PCIe 2.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR4-2400 | — |
| Max RAM Capacity | 64 GB | — |
| RAM Channels | 2 | — |
| ECC Support | Yes | — |
| PCIe Lanes | 16 | — |
Advanced Features
Virtualization: VT-x, VT-d (Core i3-9100F) / not specified (FX-8120). Primary use case: Core i3-9100F targets Desktop.
| Feature | Core i3-9100F | FX-8120 |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | No | — |
| Unlocked | No | — |
| AVX-512 | No | — |
| Virtualization | VT-x, VT-d | — |
| Target Use | Desktop | — |
Value Analysis
At launch, the Core i3-9100F was priced at $97, while the FX-8120 came in at $205. On launch pricing ($97 vs $205), Core i3-9100F was $108 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Core i3-9100F delivers 69.1 pts/$ vs 32.2 pts/$ for the FX-8120 — making the Core i3-9100F the 73% better value option.
| Feature | Core i3-9100F | FX-8120 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $97-53% | $205 |
| Performance per Dollar | 69.1+115% | 32.2 |
| Release Date | 2019 | 2011 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.
















