
FX-8120 vs Xeon E7340

FX-8120

Xeon E7340
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The FX-8120 is positioned at rank 567 and the Xeon E7340 is on rank 470, so the Xeon E7340 offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar FX-8120
Performance Per Dollar Xeon E7340
Performance Comparison
About PassMark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
| Insight | FX-8120 | Xeon E7340 |
|---|---|---|
| Gaming | ✅ Superior gaming performance | ❌ Lower gaming performance |
| Workstation | ✅ Better multi-core power | ❌ Weaker in multi-core tasks |
| Price | ✅ More affordable ($40) | ⚠️ Higher cost ($132) |
| Longevity | 🛑 Legacy (Zambezi (2011−2012) / 32 nm) | 🛑 Legacy (Legacy / 65 nm) |
💎 Value Proposition
| Insight | FX-8120 | Xeon E7340 |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ✅ Better overall value (+233%) | ❌ Lower cost efficiency |
| Upfront Cost | ✅ More affordable ($40) | ⚠️ Higher cost ($132) |
Performance Check
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of FX-8120 and Xeon E7340

FX-8120
The FX-8120 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 12 October 2011 (14 years ago). It is based on the Zambezi (2011−2012) architecture. It features 8 cores and 8 threads. Base frequency is 3.1 GHz, with boost up to 4 GHz. L3 cache: 8192 kB. L2 cache: 8192 kB. Built on 32 nm process technology. Socket: AM3+. Thermal design power (TDP): 125 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 6,594 points. Launch price was $149.

Xeon E7340
The Xeon E7340 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2015-01-01. Base frequency: 2.4 GHz. L3 cache: 8 MB L2 Cache. Built on 65 nm process technology. Socket: PGA604. Thermal design power (TDP): 80 Watt. Passmark benchmark score: 6,544 points. Launch price was $800.
Processing Power
The FX-8120 is built on the Zambezi (2011−2012) architecture. In PassMark, the FX-8120 scores 6,594 against the Xeon E7340's 6,544 — a 0.8% lead for the FX-8120. L3 cache: 8192 kB on the FX-8120 vs 8 MB L2 Cache on the Xeon E7340.
| Feature | FX-8120 | Xeon E7340 |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 8 / 8 | — |
| Boost Clock | 4 GHz | — |
| Base Clock | 3.1 GHz+29% | 2.4 GHz |
| L3 Cache | 8192 kB | 8 MB L2 Cache |
| L2 Cache | 8192 kB | — |
| Process | 32 nm-51% | 65 nm |
| Architecture | Zambezi (2011−2012) | — |
| PassMark | 6,594 | 6,544 |
Memory & Platform
The FX-8120 uses the AM3+ socket (PCIe 2.0), while the Xeon E7340 uses PGA604 (PCIe 2.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.
| Feature | FX-8120 | Xeon E7340 |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | AM3+ | PGA604 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 2.0 | PCIe 2.0 |
Value Analysis
The FX-8120 launched at $205 MSRP, while the Xeon E7340 debuted at $213. At current prices ($40 vs $132), the FX-8120 is $92 cheaper. In terms of value (PassMark points per dollar), the FX-8120 delivers 164.8 pts/$ vs 49.6 pts/$ for the Xeon E7340 — making the FX-8120 the 107.5% better value option.
| Feature | FX-8120 | Xeon E7340 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $205-4% | $213 |
| Avg Price (30d) | $40-70% | $132 |
| Performance per Dollar | 164.8+232% | 49.6 |
| Release Date | 2011 | 2007 |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.













