FX-8320
VS
Core i5-7400

FX-8320 vs Core i5-7400

AMD

FX-8320

8 Cores8 Thrd125 WWMax: 4 GHz2012
VS
Intel

Core i5-7400

4 Cores4 Thrd65 WWMax: 3.5 GHz2017

Performance Spectrum - CPU

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The FX-8320 is positioned at rank 566 and the Core i5-7400 is on rank 820, so the FX-8320 offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar FX-8320

#1
Ryzen 9 7950X
MSRP: $194|Avg: $20
9627%
#2
Core i9-10900T
MSRP: $120|Avg: $5
9096%
#3
Ryzen 3 PRO 4355GE
MSRP: $423|Avg: $5
6605%
#4
Ryzen Threadripper 3960X
MSRP: $1399|Avg: $85
1990%
#5
Ryzen 9 9950X
MSRP: $649|Avg: $129
1576%
#6
Ryzen 5 8400F
MSRP: $303|Avg: $55
1379%
#7
Ryzen 7 PRO 2700
MSRP: $299|Avg: $60
790%
#8
Ryzen 5 2600X
MSRP: $229|Avg: $55
779%
#9
Ryzen 3 PRO 5350G
MSRP: $150|Avg: $60
710%
#10
Core Ultra 5 245KF
MSRP: $294|Avg: $189
710%
#11
Ryzen 5 5500
MSRP: $159|Avg: $85
702%
#12
Ryzen 5 3600
MSRP: $199|Avg: $80
683%
#13
Core i3-9100E
MSRP: $202|Avg: $30
673%
#14
Core Ultra 5 245K
MSRP: $319|Avg: $200
670%
#15
Core i3-8300T
MSRP: $138|Avg: $25
664%
#566
FX-8320
MSRP: $169|Avg: $50
100%
#567
FX-8120
MSRP: $205|Avg: $40
99%
#568
Core i3-7100T
MSRP: $117|Avg: $39
99%
#569
Pentium E2220
MSRP: $32|Avg: $32
99%
#571
Pentium G620T
MSRP: $64|Avg: $90
99%
#572
Pentium G4500T
MSRP: $75|Avg: $20
99%
#573
Core i5-7500
MSRP: $199|Avg: $65
99%
#574
Core i7-7700
MSRP: $272|Avg: $102
98%
#575
Celeron G1610T
MSRP: $42|Avg: $42
98%
#576
Athlon X4 750K
MSRP: $91|Avg: $17
98%
#577
Core i7-7700K
MSRP: $305|Avg: $140
97%
#578
Core i5-7600K
MSRP: $217|Avg: $84
97%
#579
FX-6300
MSRP: $132|Avg: $35
97%
#581
Core i3-6100T
MSRP: $117|Avg: $20
96%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Per Dollar Core i5-7400

#1
Ryzen 9 7950X
MSRP: $194|Avg: $20
16732%
#2
Core i9-10900T
MSRP: $120|Avg: $5
15810%
#3
Ryzen 3 PRO 4355GE
MSRP: $423|Avg: $5
11479%
#4
Ryzen Threadripper 3960X
MSRP: $1399|Avg: $85
3458%
#5
Ryzen 9 9950X
MSRP: $649|Avg: $129
2739%
#6
Ryzen 5 8400F
MSRP: $303|Avg: $55
2396%
#7
Ryzen 7 PRO 2700
MSRP: $299|Avg: $60
1373%
#8
Ryzen 5 2600X
MSRP: $229|Avg: $55
1355%
#9
Ryzen 3 PRO 5350G
MSRP: $150|Avg: $60
1233%
#10
Core Ultra 5 245KF
MSRP: $294|Avg: $189
1233%
#11
Ryzen 5 5500
MSRP: $159|Avg: $85
1219%
#12
Ryzen 5 3600
MSRP: $199|Avg: $80
1187%
#13
Core i3-9100E
MSRP: $202|Avg: $30
1170%
#14
Core Ultra 5 245K
MSRP: $319|Avg: $200
1165%
#15
Core i3-8300T
MSRP: $138|Avg: $25
1155%
#295
Core i9-7940X
MSRP: $1399|Avg: $275
98%
#820
Core i5-7400
MSRP: $294|Avg: $70
100%
#821
Pentium E5800
MSRP: $64|Avg: $15
100%
#822
Core i7-6820EQ
MSRP: $378|Avg: $344
100%
#823
A6-9500
MSRP: $101|Avg: $25
100%
#824
Pentium G2120T
MSRP: $87|Avg: $10
100%
#825
Athlon II X2 270
MSRP: $72|Avg: $15
99%
#827
Core i7-6850K
MSRP: $617|Avg: $80
99%
#828
Core i5-2500K
MSRP: $225|Avg: $35
99%
#829
Pentium G3430
MSRP: $116|Avg: $30
98%
#830
Pentium E5400
MSRP: $55|Avg: $49
98%
#831
Core i5-4570R
MSRP: $250|Avg: $20
98%
#832
A6-3650
MSRP: $115|Avg: $20
98%
#833
Core i7-4770R
MSRP: $360|Avg: $89
98%
#835
Core i7-2600
MSRP: $294|Avg: $50
98%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Comparison

About PassMark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

🚀 Performance Leadership

Generational Difference: This comparison involves processors from different technological eras. The Core i5-7400 (2017) utilizes 14 nm technology and DDR4, providing a fundamental performance advantage.
InsightFX-8320Core i5-7400
Gaming
Lower gaming performance
Superior gaming performance
Workstation
Better multi-core power
Weaker in multi-core tasks
Price
More affordable ($50)
⚠️ Higher cost ($70)
Longevity
🛑 Legacy (Vishera (2012−2015) / 32 nm)
✨ Modern (Kaby Lake (2016−2019) / 14 nm)

💎 Value Proposition

The FX-8320 (2012) relies on 32 nm technology and DDR3, placing it in a different performance category relative to modern standards.
InsightFX-8320Core i5-7400
Cost Efficiency
Better overall value (+40%)
Lower cost efficiency
Upfront Cost
More affordable ($50)
⚠️ Higher cost ($70)

Performance Check

Paired with RTX 4090

To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of FX-8320 and Core i5-7400

AMD

FX-8320

The FX-8320 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 23 October 2012 (13 years ago). It is based on the Vishera (2012−2015) architecture. It features 8 cores and 8 threads. Base frequency is 3.5 GHz, with boost up to 4 GHz. L2 cache: 8192 kB. Built on 32 nm process technology. Socket: AM3+. Thermal design power (TDP): 125 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 5,472 points. Launch price was $149.

Intel

Core i5-7400

The Core i5-7400 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 3 January 2017 (8 years ago). It is based on the Kaby Lake (2016−2019) architecture. It features 4 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 3 GHz, with boost up to 3.5 GHz. L3 cache: 6 MB (total). L2 cache: 256K (per core). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1151. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 5,477 points. Launch price was $182.

Processing Power

The FX-8320 packs 8 cores / 8 threads, while the Core i5-7400 offers 4 cores / 4 threads — the FX-8320 has 4 more cores. Boost clocks reach 4 GHz on the FX-8320 versus 3.5 GHz on the Core i5-7400 — a 13.3% clock advantage for the FX-8320 (base: 3.5 GHz vs 3 GHz). The FX-8320 uses the Vishera (2012−2015) architecture (32 nm), while the Core i5-7400 uses Kaby Lake (2016−2019) (14 nm). In PassMark, the FX-8320 scores 5,472 against the Core i5-7400's 5,477 — a 0.1% lead for the Core i5-7400. Cinebench R23 multi-core: 4,500 vs 3,359 (29% advantage for the FX-8320). Geekbench 6 single-core — the metric most relevant to gaming — records 458 vs 1,215, a 90.5% lead for the Core i5-7400 that directly translates to higher frame rates. Multi-core Geekbench: 1,791 vs 3,517 (65% advantage for the Core i5-7400).

FeatureFX-8320Core i5-7400
Cores / Threads
8 / 8+100%
4 / 4
Boost Clock
4 GHz+14%
3.5 GHz
Base Clock
3.5 GHz+17%
3 GHz
L3 Cache
6 MB (total)
L2 Cache
8192 kB+3100%
256K (per core)
Process
32 nm
14 nm-56%
Architecture
Vishera (2012−2015)
Kaby Lake (2016−2019)
PassMark
5,472
5,477
Cinebench R23 Multi
4,500+34%
3,359
Geekbench 6 Single
458
1,215+165%
Geekbench 6 Multi
1,791
3,517+96%
🧠

Memory & Platform

The FX-8320 uses the AM3+ socket (PCIe 2.0), while the Core i5-7400 uses LGA1151 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR3-1866 on the FX-8320 versus DDR4-2400 on the Core i5-7400 — the Core i5-7400 supports 28.6% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The Core i5-7400 supports up to 64 GB of RAM compared to 32 GB 66.7% more capacity for professional workloads. Both feature 2-channel memory with ECC support. Both provide 16 PCIe lanes. Chipset compatibility: 970,990X,990FX (FX-8320) and 100-series,200-series (Core i5-7400).

FeatureFX-8320Core i5-7400
Socket
AM3+
LGA1151
PCIe Generation
PCIe 2.0
PCIe 3.0+50%
Max RAM Speed
DDR3-1866
DDR4-2400+33%
Max RAM Capacity
32 GB
64 GB+100%
RAM Channels
2
2
ECC Support
PCIe Lanes
16
16
🔧

Advanced Features

Only the FX-8320 has an unlocked multiplier for overclocking — a significant advantage for enthusiasts seeking extra performance. Virtualization support: AMD-V (FX-8320) vs VT-x, VT-d, EPT (Core i5-7400). The Core i5-7400 includes integrated graphics (HD Graphics 630), while the FX-8320 requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: FX-8320 targets Productivity, Core i5-7400 targets Gaming. Direct competitor: FX-8320 rivals Core i5-3570; Core i5-7400 rivals Ryzen 3 3300X.

FeatureFX-8320Core i5-7400
Integrated GPU
No
Yes
IGPU Model
HD Graphics 630
Unlocked
Yes
No
AVX-512
No
No
Virtualization
AMD-V
VT-x, VT-d, EPT
Target Use
Productivity
Gaming
💰

Value Analysis

The FX-8320 launched at $169 MSRP, while the Core i5-7400 debuted at $294. At current prices ($50 vs $70), the FX-8320 is $20 cheaper. In terms of value (PassMark points per dollar), the FX-8320 delivers 109.4 pts/$ vs 78.2 pts/$ for the Core i5-7400 — making the FX-8320 the 33.2% better value option.

FeatureFX-8320Core i5-7400
MSRP
$169-43%
$294
Avg Price (30d)
$50-29%
$70
Performance per Dollar
109.4+40%
78.2
Release Date
2012
2017