FX-8320E vs Ryzen 5 5600

AMD

FX-8320E

8 Cores8 Thrd95 WWMax: 4 GHz2014
VS
AMD

Ryzen 5 5600

6 Cores12 Thrd65 WWMax: 4.4 GHz2022
Ryzen family
·······

FX-8320E vs Ryzen 5 5600 Performance Spectrum

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

FX-8320E vs Ryzen 5 5600 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

FX-8320E vs Ryzen 5 5600: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

FX-8320E

2014

Why buy it

  • Costs $52 less on MSRP ($147 MSRP vs $199 MSRP).

Trade-offs

  • Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Ryzen 5 5600 across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
  • Lower Geekbench multi-core (1,734 vs 8,600).
  • Lower PassMark per dollar, at 33.7 vs 108.3 PassMark/$ ($147 MSRP vs $199 MSRP).
  • 46.2% higher power demand at 95W vs 65W.

Ryzen 5 5600

2022

Why buy it

  • Better for gaming: +97.2% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
  • Delivers 220.9% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 108.3 vs 33.7 PassMark/$ ($199 MSRP vs $147 MSRP).
  • Draws 65W instead of 95W, a 30W reduction.
  • 100+% more PCIe lanes (24 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.

Trade-offs

  • 35.4% HIGHER MSRP
    $199 MSRPvs$147 MSRP

Quick Answers

So, is Ryzen 5 5600 better than FX-8320E?
Yes. Ryzen 5 5600 is the better all-around CPU here. It gives you a 97.2% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data, 396% better Geekbench multi-core, 334.5% higher PassMark, and the stronger long-term platform, which is enough to make it the stronger overall pick.
Which one is better for gaming?
If gaming is the priority, Ryzen 5 5600 is the better pick. According to our tests, it delivers 97.2% more average FPS across 50 shared CPU game tests.
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Ryzen 5 5600 is the stronger fit. You are getting 396% better Geekbench multi-core, backed by 6 cores and 12 threads.
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Ryzen 5 5600 is the better buy right now. Ryzen 5 5600 comes in 35.4% more expensive on MSRP at $199 MSRP versus $147 MSRP, and it still gives you a 97.2% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. It is also 220.9% better value on MSRP (108.3 vs 33.7 PassMark/$), so you are getting the faster CPU without taking a value hit on paper.
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Ryzen 5 5600 makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2022 vs 2014) and more multi-core headroom with 6 cores / 12 threads instead of 8/8. That extra compute headroom is more likely to matter as games, background tasks, and creator workloads get heavier.

FX-8320E vs Ryzen 5 5600 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

AMD

FX-8320E

The FX-8320E is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 2 September 2014 (11 years ago). It is based on the Vishera (2012−2015) architecture. It features 8 cores and 8 threads. Base frequency is 3.2 GHz, with boost up to 4 GHz. L2 cache: 8192 kB. Built on 32 nm process technology. Socket: AM3+. Thermal design power (TDP): 95 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 4,960 points. Launch price was $147.

AMD

Ryzen 5 5600

The Ryzen 5 5600 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 20 April 2022 (3 years ago). It is based on the Vermeer (2020−2025) architecture. It features 6 cores and 12 threads. Base frequency is 3.5 GHz, with boost up to 4.4 GHz. L3 cache: 32 MB (total). L2 cache: 512K (per core). Built on 7 nm process technology. Socket: AM4. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-3200. Passmark benchmark score: 21,550 points. Launch price was $299.

Processing Power

The FX-8320E packs 8 cores / 8 threads, while the Ryzen 5 5600 offers 6 cores / 12 threads — the FX-8320E has 2 more cores. Boost clocks reach 4 GHz on the FX-8320E versus 4.4 GHz on the Ryzen 5 5600 — a 9.5% clock advantage for the Ryzen 5 5600 (base: 3.2 GHz vs 3.5 GHz). The FX-8320E uses the Vishera (2012−2015) architecture (32 nm), while the Ryzen 5 5600 uses Vermeer (2020−2025) (7 nm). In PassMark, the FX-8320E scores 4,960 against the Ryzen 5 5600's 21,550 — a 125.2% lead for the Ryzen 5 5600. Geekbench 6 single-core — the metric most relevant to gaming — records 439 vs 2,052, a 129.5% lead for the Ryzen 5 5600 that directly translates to higher frame rates. Multi-core Geekbench: 1,734 vs 8,600 (132.9% advantage for the Ryzen 5 5600).

FeatureFX-8320ERyzen 5 5600
Cores / Threads
8 / 8+33%
6 / 12
Boost Clock
4 GHz
4.4 GHz+10%
Base Clock
3.2 GHz
3.5 GHz+9%
L3 Cache
32 MB (total)
L2 Cache
8192 kB+1500%
512K (per core)
Process
32 nm
7 nm-78%
Architecture
Vishera (2012−2015)
Vermeer (2020−2025)
PassMark
4,960
21,550+334%
Cinebench R23 Multi
11,077
Geekbench 6 Single
439
2,052+367%
Geekbench 6 Multi
1,734
8,600+396%
🧠

Memory & Platform

The FX-8320E uses the AM3+ socket (PCIe 2.0), while the Ryzen 5 5600 uses AM4 (PCIe 4.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR3-1866 on the FX-8320E versus DDR4-3200 on the Ryzen 5 5600 — the Ryzen 5 5600 supports 71.5% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The Ryzen 5 5600 supports up to 128 GB of RAM compared to 32 GB 300% more capacity for professional workloads. Both feature 2-channel memory with ECC support. PCIe lanes: 0 (FX-8320E) vs 24 (Ryzen 5 5600) — the Ryzen 5 5600 offers 24 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: AMD 990FX,AMD 970 (FX-8320E) and B550,X570,B450,X470,A520 (Ryzen 5 5600).

FeatureFX-8320ERyzen 5 5600
Socket
AM3+
AM4
PCIe Generation
PCIe 2.0
PCIe 4.0+100%
Max RAM Speed
DDR3-1866
DDR4-3200+71%
Max RAM Capacity
32 GB
128 GB+300%
RAM Channels
2
2
ECC Support
No
Yes
PCIe Lanes
0
24
🔧

Advanced Features

Both processors feature an unlocked multiplier for overclocking. Both support AMD-V virtualization. Primary use case: Ryzen 5 5600 targets Desktop.

FeatureFX-8320ERyzen 5 5600
Integrated GPU
No
No
Unlocked
Yes
Yes
AVX-512
No
No
Virtualization
AMD-V
AMD-V
Target Use
Desktop
💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the FX-8320E was priced at $147, while the Ryzen 5 5600 came in at $199. On launch pricing ($147 vs $199), FX-8320E was $52 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the FX-8320E delivers 33.7 pts/$ vs 108.3 pts/$ for the Ryzen 5 5600 — making the Ryzen 5 5600 the 105% better value option.

FeatureFX-8320ERyzen 5 5600
MSRP
$147-26%
$199
Performance per Dollar
33.7
108.3+221%
Release Date
2014
2022

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.