FX-8320E vs Ryzen 7 5700X

CPU

GPU

FX-8320E

8 Cores8 Thrd95 WWMax: 4 GHz2014

Similar parts

·······

Buy on Amazon

Ryzen 7 5700X

8 Cores16 Thrd65 WWMax: 4.6 GHz2022

Ryzen family

·······

Buy on Amazon

FX-8320E vs Ryzen 7 5700X Performance Spectrum

FX-8320E

8 / 8

4,960

0.0%

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7965WX

Ryzen 7 5700X

8 / 16

26,609

+436.5%

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7955WX

Ryzen Threadripper 3990X

Ryzen Threadripper 9960X

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

FX-8320E vs Ryzen 7 5700X FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

FX-8320E vs Ryzen 7 5700X: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

FX-8320E

2014

Why buy it

✅Costs $152 less on MSRP ($147 MSRP vs $299 MSRP).
✅Includes a boxed cooler (Yes), unlike Ryzen 7 5700X.

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Ryzen 7 5700X across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Lower Geekbench multi-core (1,734 vs 9,715).
❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 33.7 vs 89.0 PassMark/$ ($147 MSRP vs $299 MSRP).
❌46.2% higher power demand at 95W vs 65W.

Ryzen 7 5700X

2022

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +121.7% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅Delivers 163.8% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 89.0 vs 33.7 PassMark/$ ($299 MSRP vs $147 MSRP).
✅Draws 65W instead of 95W, a 30W reduction.
✅100+% more PCIe lanes (24 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.

Trade-offs

❌
103.4% HIGHER MSRP
$299 MSRPvs$147 MSRP
❌No boxed cooler included, unlike FX-8320E.

Quick Answers

So, is Ryzen 7 5700X better than FX-8320E?

Yes. Ryzen 7 5700X is the better all-around CPU here. It gives you a 121.7% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data, 460.3% better Geekbench multi-core, 436.5% higher PassMark, and the stronger long-term platform, which is enough to make it the stronger overall pick.

Which one is better for gaming?

If gaming is the priority, Ryzen 7 5700X is the better pick. According to our tests, it delivers 121.7% more average FPS across 50 shared CPU game tests.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Ryzen 7 5700X is the stronger fit. You are getting 460.3% better Geekbench multi-core, backed by 8 cores and 16 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Ryzen 7 5700X is the better buy right now. Ryzen 7 5700X comes in 103.4% more expensive on MSRP at $299 MSRP versus $147 MSRP, and it still gives you a 121.7% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. It is also 163.8% better value on MSRP (89.0 vs 33.7 PassMark/$), so you are getting the faster CPU without taking a value hit on paper.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Ryzen 7 5700X makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2022 vs 2014) and more multi-core headroom with 8 cores / 16 threads instead of 8/8. That extra compute headroom is more likely to matter as games, background tasks, and creator workloads get heavier.

FX-8320E vs Ryzen 7 5700X Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

FX-8320E

The FX-8320E is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 2 September 2014 (11 years ago). It is based on the Vishera (2012−2015) architecture. It features 8 cores and 8 threads. Base frequency is 3.2 GHz, with boost up to 4 GHz. L2 cache: 8192 kB. Built on 32 nm process technology. Socket: AM3+. Thermal design power (TDP): 95 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 4,960 points. Launch price was $147.

Ryzen 7 5700X

The Ryzen 7 5700X is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 4 April 2022 (3 years ago). It is based on the Vermeer (Zen 3) (2020−2022) architecture. It features 8 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 3.4 GHz, with boost up to 4.6 GHz. L3 cache: 32 MB (total). L2 cache: 512K (per core). Built on 7 nm process technology. Socket: AM4. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-3200. Passmark benchmark score: 26,609 points. Launch price was $299.

⚡

Processing Power

The FX-8320E packs 8 cores / 8 threads, matching the Ryzen 7 5700X's 8 cores. Boost clocks reach 4 GHz on the FX-8320E versus 4.6 GHz on the Ryzen 7 5700X — a 14% clock advantage for the Ryzen 7 5700X (base: 3.2 GHz vs 3.4 GHz). The FX-8320E uses the Vishera (2012−2015) architecture (32 nm), while the Ryzen 7 5700X uses Vermeer (Zen 3) (2020−2022) (7 nm). In PassMark, the FX-8320E scores 4,960 against the Ryzen 7 5700X's 26,609 — a 137.2% lead for the Ryzen 7 5700X. Geekbench 6 single-core — the metric most relevant to gaming — records 439 vs 2,116, a 131.3% lead for the Ryzen 7 5700X that directly translates to higher frame rates. Multi-core Geekbench: 1,734 vs 9,715 (139.4% advantage for the Ryzen 7 5700X).

Feature	FX-8320E	Ryzen 7 5700X
Cores / Threads	8 / 8	8 / 16
Boost Clock	4 GHz	4.6 GHz+15%
Base Clock	3.2 GHz	3.4 GHz+6%
L3 Cache	—	32 MB (total)
L2 Cache	8192 kB+1500%	512K (per core)
Process	32 nm	7 nm-78%
Architecture	Vishera (2012−2015)	Vermeer (Zen 3) (2020−2022)
PassMark	4,960	26,609+436%
Cinebench R23 Multi	—	14,000
Geekbench 6 Single	439	2,116+382%
Geekbench 6 Multi	1,734	9,715+460%

🧠

Memory & Platform

The FX-8320E uses the AM3+ socket (PCIe 2.0), while the Ryzen 7 5700X uses AM4 (PCIe 4.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR3-1866 on the FX-8320E versus DDR4-3200 on the Ryzen 7 5700X — the Ryzen 7 5700X supports 71.5% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The Ryzen 7 5700X supports up to 128 GB of RAM compared to 32 GB — 300% more capacity for professional workloads. Both feature 2-channel memory with ECC support. PCIe lanes: 0 (FX-8320E) vs 24 (Ryzen 7 5700X) — the Ryzen 7 5700X offers 24 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: AMD 990FX,AMD 970 (FX-8320E) and A320,B350,X370,B450,X470,B550,X570 (Ryzen 7 5700X).

Feature	FX-8320E	Ryzen 7 5700X
Socket	AM3+	AM4
PCIe Generation	PCIe 2.0	PCIe 4.0+100%
Max RAM Speed	DDR3-1866	DDR4-3200+71%
Max RAM Capacity	32 GB	128 GB+300%
RAM Channels	2	2
ECC Support	No	Yes
PCIe Lanes	0	24

🔧

Advanced Features

Both processors feature an unlocked multiplier for overclocking. Both support AMD-V virtualization. Primary use case: Ryzen 7 5700X targets Gaming. Direct competitor: Ryzen 7 5700X rivals Core i7-11700K.

Feature	FX-8320E	Ryzen 7 5700X
Integrated GPU	No	No
Unlocked	Yes	Yes
AVX-512	No	No
Virtualization	AMD-V	AMD-V
Target Use	—	Gaming

💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the FX-8320E was priced at $147, while the Ryzen 7 5700X came in at $299. On launch pricing ($147 vs $299), FX-8320E was $152 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the FX-8320E delivers 33.7 pts/$ vs 89.0 pts/$ for the Ryzen 7 5700X — making the Ryzen 7 5700X the 90% better value option.

Feature	FX-8320E	Ryzen 7 5700X
MSRP	$147-51%	$299
Performance per Dollar	33.7	89.0+164%
Release Date	2014	2022

Search FX-8320E on Amazon

Search Ryzen 7 5700X on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.