FX-8800P vs Core 2 Duo P8700
FX-8800P
Core 2 Duo P8700
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The FX-8800P is positioned at rank 903 and the Core 2 Duo P8700 is on rank 140, so the Core 2 Duo P8700 offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar FX-8800P
Performance Per Dollar Core 2 Duo P8700
Performance Comparison
About PassMark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
| Insight | FX-8800P | Core 2 Duo P8700 |
|---|---|---|
| Gaming | ✅ Superior gaming performance | ❌ Lower gaming performance |
| Workstation | ✅ Better multi-core power | ❌ Weaker in multi-core tasks |
| Price | ✅ More affordable ($45) | ⚠️ Higher cost ($85) |
| Longevity | 🛑 Legacy (Carrizo (2015−2018) / 28 nm) | 🛑 Legacy (Penryn (2008−2011) / 45 nm) |
💎 Value Proposition
| Insight | FX-8800P | Core 2 Duo P8700 |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ✅ Better overall value (+91%) | ❌ Lower cost efficiency |
| Upfront Cost | ✅ More affordable ($45) | ⚠️ Higher cost ($85) |
Performance Check
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of FX-8800P and Core 2 Duo P8700
FX-8800P
The FX-8800P is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 2 June 2015 (10 years ago). It is based on the Carrizo (2015−2018) architecture. It features 4 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 2.1 GHz, with boost up to 3.4 GHz. L2 cache: 2048 kB. Built on 28 nm process technology. Socket: FP4. Thermal design power (TDP): 15 Watt. Memory support: DDR3-2133. Passmark benchmark score: 2,833 points. Launch price was $69.
Core 2 Duo P8700
The Core 2 Duo P8700 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 1 January 2009 (16 years ago). It is based on the Penryn (2008−2011) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency is 2.53 GHz, with boost up to 2.53 GHz. L3 cache: 3 MB L2 Cache. L2 cache: 3 MB. Built on 45 nm process technology. Socket: PGA478. Thermal design power (TDP): 25 Watt. Passmark benchmark score: 2,805 points. Launch price was $209.
Processing Power
The FX-8800P packs 4 cores / 4 threads, while the Core 2 Duo P8700 offers 2 cores / 2 threads — the FX-8800P has 2 more cores. Boost clocks reach 3.4 GHz on the FX-8800P versus 2.53 GHz on the Core 2 Duo P8700 — a 29.3% clock advantage for the FX-8800P (base: 2.1 GHz vs 2.53 GHz). The FX-8800P uses the Carrizo (2015−2018) architecture (28 nm), while the Core 2 Duo P8700 uses Penryn (2008−2011) (45 nm). In PassMark, the FX-8800P scores 2,833 against the Core 2 Duo P8700's 2,805 — a 1% lead for the FX-8800P.
| Feature | FX-8800P | Core 2 Duo P8700 |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 4 / 4+100% | 2 / 2 |
| Boost Clock | 3.4 GHz+34% | 2.53 GHz |
| Base Clock | 2.1 GHz | 2.53 GHz+20% |
| L3 Cache | — | 3 MB L2 Cache |
| L2 Cache | 2048 kB | 3 MB+50% |
| Process | 28 nm-38% | 45 nm |
| Architecture | Carrizo (2015−2018) | Penryn (2008−2011) |
| PassMark | 2,833 | 2,805 |
Memory & Platform
The FX-8800P uses the FP4 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Core 2 Duo P8700 uses PGA478 (PCIe 1.1) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.
| Feature | FX-8800P | Core 2 Duo P8700 |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | FP4 | PGA478 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 3.0+173% | PCIe 1.1 |
| Max RAM Speed | — | 1066 |
| Max RAM Capacity | — | 8 |
| RAM Channels | — | 2 |
| ECC Support | — | ❌ |
| PCIe Lanes | — | 0 |
Advanced Features
Virtualization: not specified (FX-8800P) / true (Core 2 Duo P8700). Direct competitor: Core 2 Duo P8700 rivals Turion II Ultra M600.
| Feature | FX-8800P | Core 2 Duo P8700 |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | — | No |
| IGPU Model | — | None |
| Unlocked | — | No |
| AVX-512 | — | No |
| Virtualization | — | true |
Value Analysis
The FX-8800P launched at $150 MSRP, while the Core 2 Duo P8700 debuted at $241. At current prices ($45 vs $85), the FX-8800P is $40 cheaper. In terms of value (PassMark points per dollar), the FX-8800P delivers 63.0 pts/$ vs 33.0 pts/$ for the Core 2 Duo P8700 — making the FX-8800P the 62.4% better value option.
| Feature | FX-8800P | Core 2 Duo P8700 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $150-38% | $241 |
| Avg Price (30d) | $45-47% | $85 |
| Performance per Dollar | 63.0+91% | 33.0 |
| Release Date | 2015 | 2009 |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar CPU comparisons based on FX-8800P and Core 2 Duo P8700
