FX-8800P
VS
Core i5-5257U

FX-8800P vs Core i5-5257U

AMD

FX-8800P

4 Cores4 Thrd15 WWMax: 3.4 GHz2015
VS
Intel

Core i5-5257U

2 Cores4 Thrd512 WWMax: 3.1 GHz2015

Performance Spectrum - CPU

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The FX-8800P is positioned at rank 903 and the Core i5-5257U is on rank 725, so the Core i5-5257U offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar FX-8800P

#891
Atom x5-Z8300
MSRP: $20|Avg: N/A
1553%
#892
Atom Z3735G
MSRP: $17|Avg: N/A
1530%
#893
Core i5-480M
MSRP: $81|Avg: $77
1405%
#894
Core i5-460M
MSRP: $80|Avg: $129
1399%
#895
Core i5-2540M
MSRP: $266|Avg: $10
1386%
#897
Core i5-450M
MSRP: $32|Avg: $31
1338%
#898
Core i3-380M
MSRP: $49|Avg: $25
1283%
#899
Core i5-430M
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $33
1281%
#900
Core 2 Duo T6600
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $4
1247%
#903
FX-8800P
MSRP: $150|Avg: $45
100%
#905
Core i7-8809G
MSRP: $450|Avg: $450
99%
#911
Core i7-6820HK
MSRP: $378|Avg: N/A
98%
#912
Athlon II Neo K325
MSRP: $60|Avg: $25
98%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Per Dollar Core i5-5257U

#713
Atom x5-Z8300
MSRP: $20|Avg: N/A
1034%
#714
Atom Z3735G
MSRP: $17|Avg: N/A
1019%
#715
Core i5-480M
MSRP: $81|Avg: $77
935%
#716
Core i5-460M
MSRP: $80|Avg: $129
931%
#717
Core i5-2540M
MSRP: $266|Avg: $10
923%
#719
Core i5-450M
MSRP: $32|Avg: $31
891%
#720
Core i3-380M
MSRP: $49|Avg: $25
854%
#721
Core i5-430M
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $33
853%
#722
Core 2 Duo T6600
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $4
830%
#725
Core i5-5257U
MSRP: N/A|Avg: N/A
100%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Comparison

About PassMark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

🚀 Performance Leadership

Performance Trade-off: The FX-8800P leads in gaming performance. However, the Core i5-5257U is the stronger candidate for professional workloads, offering 0.1% greater multi-core processing power.
InsightFX-8800PCore i5-5257U
Gaming
Superior gaming performance
Lower gaming performance
Workstation
Weaker in multi-core tasks
Better multi-core power
Price
⚠️ Higher cost ($45)
More affordable ($0)
Longevity
🛑 Legacy (Carrizo (2015−2018) / 28 nm)
🛑 Legacy (Broadwell-U (2015) / 14 nm)

💎 Value Proposition

InsightFX-8800PCore i5-5257U
Cost Efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Upfront Cost
⚠️ Higher cost ($45)
More affordable ($0)

Performance Check

Paired with RTX 4090

To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of FX-8800P and Core i5-5257U

AMD

FX-8800P

The FX-8800P is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 2 June 2015 (10 years ago). It is based on the Carrizo (2015−2018) architecture. It features 4 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 2.1 GHz, with boost up to 3.4 GHz. L2 cache: 2048 kB. Built on 28 nm process technology. Socket: FP4. Thermal design power (TDP): 15 Watt. Memory support: DDR3-2133. Passmark benchmark score: 2,833 points. Launch price was $69.

Intel

Core i5-5257U

The Core i5-5257U is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 1 March 2015 (10 years ago). It is based on the Broadwell-U (2015) architecture. It features 2 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 2.7 GHz, with boost up to 3.1 GHz. L3 cache: 3 MB (total). L2 cache: 256K (per core). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: FCBGA1168. Thermal design power (TDP): 28 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 2,837 points. Launch price was $315.

Processing Power

The FX-8800P packs 4 cores / 4 threads, while the Core i5-5257U offers 2 cores / 4 threads — the FX-8800P has 2 more cores. Boost clocks reach 3.4 GHz on the FX-8800P versus 3.1 GHz on the Core i5-5257U — a 9.2% clock advantage for the FX-8800P (base: 2.1 GHz vs 2.7 GHz). The FX-8800P uses the Carrizo (2015−2018) architecture (28 nm), while the Core i5-5257U uses Broadwell-U (2015) (14 nm). In PassMark, the FX-8800P scores 2,833 against the Core i5-5257U's 2,837 — a 0.1% lead for the Core i5-5257U.

FeatureFX-8800PCore i5-5257U
Cores / Threads
4 / 4+100%
2 / 4
Boost Clock
3.4 GHz+10%
3.1 GHz
Base Clock
2.1 GHz
2.7 GHz+29%
L3 Cache
3 MB (total)
L2 Cache
2048 kB+700%
256K (per core)
Process
28 nm
14 nm-50%
Architecture
Carrizo (2015−2018)
Broadwell-U (2015)
PassMark
2,833
2,837
Geekbench 6 Single
950
Geekbench 6 Multi
1,900
🧠

Memory & Platform

The FX-8800P uses the FP4 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Core i5-5257U uses FCBGA1168 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

FeatureFX-8800PCore i5-5257U
Socket
FP4
FCBGA1168
PCIe Generation
PCIe 3.0
PCIe 3.0
Max RAM Speed
LPDDR3 1866 MHz
Max RAM Capacity
16 GB
RAM Channels
2
ECC Support
PCIe Lanes
12
🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization: not specified (FX-8800P) / true (Core i5-5257U). The Core i5-5257U includes integrated graphics (Intel Iris Graphics 6100), while the FX-8800P requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Core i5-5257U targets Mobile.

FeatureFX-8800PCore i5-5257U
Integrated GPU
Yes
IGPU Model
Intel Iris Graphics 6100
Unlocked
No
AVX-512
No
Virtualization
true
Target Use
Mobile