FX-8800P vs Xeon X3450

FX-8800P vs Xeon X3450 Performance Spectrum

FX-8800P

4 / 4

2,833

0.0%

Ryzen Threadripper 3990X

Xeon X3450

4 / 8

2,877

+1.6%

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

FX-8800P vs Xeon X3450 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

FX-8800P vs Xeon X3450: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

FX-8800P

2015

Why buy it

✅Costs $91 less on MSRP ($150 MSRP vs $241 MSRP).
✅Delivers 58.2% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 18.9 vs 11.9 PassMark/$ ($150 MSRP vs $241 MSRP).
✅Draws 15W instead of 95W, a 80W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Xeon X3450 across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Lower PassMark (2,833 vs 2,877).
❌Less compelling for workstation-style loads than Xeon X3450, which brings 4 cores / 8 threads.

Xeon X3450

2009

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +6.5% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅Better for workstations and heavier parallel workloads: 4 cores / 8 threads.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 11.9 vs 18.9 PassMark/$ ($241 MSRP vs $150 MSRP).
❌533.3% higher power demand at 95W vs 15W.

Quick Answers

So, is Xeon X3450 better than FX-8800P?

Not really, because they are built for different jobs. Xeon X3450 makes more sense for workstation-style multi-core throughput, while FX-8800P is the more practical desktop choice for gaming, platform cost, and everyday use.

Which one is better for gaming?

If gaming is the priority, Xeon X3450 is the better pick. According to our tests, it delivers 6.5% more average FPS across 50 shared CPU game tests.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Xeon X3450 is the stronger fit. You are getting 1.6% better PassMark, backed by 4 cores and 8 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Xeon X3450 is the easy recommendation for a fresh desktop build. Xeon X3450 comes in 60.7% more expensive on MSRP at $241 MSRP versus $150 MSRP, and it still gives you a 6.5% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. FX-8800P only looks good on raw value math because it is a cheap legacy laptop chip, not because it is a real desktop gaming recommendation. It simply does not keep up in modern games, especially when the gap is already 6.5% in the shared gaming data.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

FX-8800P makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2015 vs 2009). That makes it the safer long-term bet.

FX-8800P vs Xeon X3450 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

FX-8800P

The FX-8800P is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 2 June 2015 (10 years ago). It is based on the Carrizo (2015−2018) architecture. It features 4 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 2.1 GHz, with boost up to 3.4 GHz. L2 cache: 2048 kB. Built on 28 nm process technology. Socket: FP4. Thermal design power (TDP): 15 Watt. Memory support: DDR3-2133. Passmark benchmark score: 2,833 points. Launch price was $69.

Xeon X3450

The Xeon X3450 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 8 September 2009 (16 years ago). It is based on the Lynnfield (2009−2010) architecture. It features 4 cores and 8 threads. Base frequency is 2.66 GHz, with boost up to 3.2 GHz. L3 cache: 8 MB (total). L2 cache: 256 kB (per core). Built on 45 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1156. Thermal design power (TDP): 95 Watt. Memory support: DDR3-800, DDR3-1066, DDR3-1333. Passmark benchmark score: 2,877 points. Launch price was $241.

⚡

Processing Power

The FX-8800P packs 4 cores / 4 threads, matching the Xeon X3450's 4 cores. Boost clocks reach 3.4 GHz on the FX-8800P versus 3.2 GHz on the Xeon X3450 — a 6.1% clock advantage for the FX-8800P (base: 2.1 GHz vs 2.66 GHz). The FX-8800P uses the Carrizo (2015−2018) architecture (28 nm), while the Xeon X3450 uses Lynnfield (2009−2010) (45 nm). In PassMark, the FX-8800P scores 2,833 against the Xeon X3450's 2,877 — a 1.5% lead for the Xeon X3450.

Feature	FX-8800P	Xeon X3450
Cores / Threads	4 / 4	4 / 8
Boost Clock	3.4 GHz+6%	3.2 GHz
Base Clock	2.1 GHz	2.66 GHz+27%
L3 Cache	—	8 MB (total)
L2 Cache	2048 kB+700%	256 kB (per core)
Process	28 nm-38%	45 nm
Architecture	Carrizo (2015−2018)	Lynnfield (2009−2010)
PassMark	2,833	2,877+2%

🧠

Memory & Platform

The FX-8800P uses the FP4 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Xeon X3450 uses LGA1156 (PCIe 2.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

Feature	FX-8800P	Xeon X3450
Socket	FP4	LGA1156
PCIe Generation	PCIe 3.0+50%	PCIe 2.0

💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the FX-8800P was priced at $150, while the Xeon X3450 came in at $241. On launch pricing ($150 vs $241), FX-8800P was $91 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the FX-8800P delivers 18.9 pts/$ vs 11.9 pts/$ for the Xeon X3450 — making the FX-8800P the 45.1% better value option.

Feature	FX-8800P	Xeon X3450
MSRP	$150-38%	$241
Performance per Dollar	18.9+59%	11.9
Release Date	2015	2009

Search FX-8800P on Amazon

Search Xeon X3450 on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.