Celeron J4105 vs FX-8800P

Celeron J4105 vs FX-8800P Performance Spectrum

Celeron J4105

4 / 4

2,820

0.0%

2,833

+0.5%

Ryzen Threadripper 3990X

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Celeron J4105 vs FX-8800P FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Celeron J4105 vs FX-8800P: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Celeron J4105

2017

Why buy it

✅Draws 10W instead of 15W, a 5W reduction.
✅100+% more PCIe lanes (6 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
✅Integrated graphics onboard with Intel UHD Graphics 600, while FX-8800P needs a discrete GPU.

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than FX-8800P across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Lower PassMark (2,820 vs 2,833).

FX-8800P

2015

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +4.6% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.

Trade-offs

❌Launch MSRP is still $150 MSRP, while Celeron J4105 mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
❌50% higher power demand at 15W vs 10W.
❌No integrated graphics, while Celeron J4105 can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.

Quick Answers

So, is FX-8800P better than Celeron J4105?

Yes. FX-8800P is the better all-around CPU here. It gives you a 4.6% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data and 0.5% better PassMark, which is enough to make it the stronger overall pick.

Which one is better for gaming?

If gaming is the priority, FX-8800P is the better pick. According to our tests, it delivers 4.6% more average FPS across 50 shared CPU game tests.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, FX-8800P is the stronger fit. You are getting 0.5% better PassMark, backed by 4 cores and 4 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

FX-8800P is the better buy right now. FX-8800P comes in at an unclear MSRP at $150 MSRP versus unclear MSRP, and it still gives you a 4.6% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. It is also 100.0% better value on MSRP (18.9 vs 0.0 PassMark/$), so you are getting the faster CPU without taking a value hit on paper.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Celeron J4105 makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2017 vs 2015). That makes it the safer long-term bet.

Celeron J4105 vs FX-8800P Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Celeron J4105

The Celeron J4105 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 11 December 2017 (7 years ago). It is based on the Goldmont Plus (2017) architecture. It features 4 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 1.5 GHz, with boost up to 2.5 GHz. L3 cache: 4 MB. L2 cache: 4 MB (total). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: FCBGA1090. Thermal design power (TDP): 10 Watt. Memory support: DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 2,820 points. Launch price was $107.

FX-8800P

The FX-8800P is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 2 June 2015 (10 years ago). It is based on the Carrizo (2015−2018) architecture. It features 4 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 2.1 GHz, with boost up to 3.4 GHz. L2 cache: 2048 kB. Built on 28 nm process technology. Socket: FP4. Thermal design power (TDP): 15 Watt. Memory support: DDR3-2133. Passmark benchmark score: 2,833 points. Launch price was $69.

⚡

Processing Power

Both the Celeron J4105 and FX-8800P share an identical 4-core/4-thread configuration. Boost clocks reach 2.5 GHz on the Celeron J4105 versus 3.4 GHz on the FX-8800P — a 30.5% clock advantage for the FX-8800P (base: 1.5 GHz vs 2.1 GHz). The Celeron J4105 uses the Goldmont Plus (2017) architecture (14 nm), while the FX-8800P uses Carrizo (2015−2018) (28 nm). In PassMark, the Celeron J4105 scores 2,820 against the FX-8800P's 2,833 — a 0.5% lead for the FX-8800P.

Feature	Celeron J4105	FX-8800P
Cores / Threads	4 / 4	4 / 4
Boost Clock	2.5 GHz	3.4 GHz+36%
Base Clock	1.5 GHz	2.1 GHz+40%
L3 Cache	4 MB	—
L2 Cache	4 MB (total)+100%	2048 kB
Process	14 nm-50%	28 nm
Architecture	Goldmont Plus (2017)	Carrizo (2015−2018)
PassMark	2,820	2,833

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Celeron J4105 uses the FCBGA1090 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the FX-8800P uses FP4 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

Feature	Celeron J4105	FX-8800P
Socket	FCBGA1090	FP4
PCIe Generation	PCIe 3.0	PCIe 3.0
Max RAM Speed	2400	—
Max RAM Capacity	8	—
RAM Channels	2	—
ECC Support	No	—
PCIe Lanes	6	—

🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization: true (Celeron J4105) / not specified (FX-8800P). The Celeron J4105 includes integrated graphics (Intel UHD Graphics 600), while the FX-8800P requires a dedicated GPU. Direct competitor: Celeron J4105 rivals Ryzen Embedded R1305G.