Celeron J4105 vs FX-8800P

Performance Spectrum - CPU

Celeron J4105

4 / 4

2,820

0.0%

2,833

+0.5%

Ryzen Threadripper 3990X

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Celeron J4105 is positioned at rank 900 and the FX-8800P is on rank 903, so the Celeron J4105 offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.•
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar Celeron J4105

#1

Ryzen 9 7950X

MSRP: $194|Avg: $20

20892%

#2

Core i9-10900T

MSRP: $120|Avg: $5

19741%

#3

Ryzen 3 PRO 4355GE

MSRP: $423|Avg: $5

14334%

#4

Ryzen Threadripper 3960X

MSRP: $1399|Avg: $85

4318%

#5

Ryzen 9 9950X

MSRP: $649|Avg: $129

3420%

#6

Ryzen 5 8400F

MSRP: $303|Avg: $55

2992%

#7

Ryzen 7 PRO 2700

MSRP: $299|Avg: $60

1714%

#8

Ryzen 5 2600X

MSRP: $229|Avg: $55

1691%

#9

Ryzen 3 PRO 5350G

MSRP: $150|Avg: $60

1540%

#10

Core Ultra 5 245KF

MSRP: $294|Avg: $189

1540%

#11

Ryzen 5 5500

MSRP: $159|Avg: $85

1523%

#12

Ryzen 5 3600

MSRP: $199|Avg: $80

1482%

#13

Core i3-9100E

MSRP: $202|Avg: $30

1461%

#14

Core Ultra 5 245K

MSRP: $319|Avg: $200

1455%

#15

Core i3-8300T

MSRP: $138|Avg: $25

1442%

#299

Core i9-7980XE

MSRP: $1999|Avg: $300

99%

#900

Celeron J4105

MSRP: N/A|Avg: N/A

100%

#902

Core i3-6100E

MSRP: $225|Avg: $50

99%

#903

Core i3-4330TE

MSRP: $138|Avg: $15

98%

#904

Pentium E5700

MSRP: $75|Avg: $15

98%

#906

Athlon II X3 420e

MSRP: $107|Avg: $15

98%

#907

Celeron E1500

MSRP: $53|Avg: $5

97%

#909

Pentium G6950

MSRP: $87|Avg: $25

96%

#910

Pentium J4205

MSRP: $161|Avg: $161

96%

#911

Core i3-2120

MSRP: $138|Avg: $25

96%

#912

Pentium E6600

MSRP: $84|Avg: $50

95%

#913

Pentium G3460

MSRP: $149|Avg: $25

95%

#914

Pentium E5500

MSRP: $75|Avg: $25

95%

#915

Pentium E6700

MSRP: $86|Avg: $5

95%

Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Per Dollar FX-8800P

#891

Atom x5-Z8300

MSRP: $20|Avg: N/A

1553%

#892

Atom Z3735G

MSRP: $17|Avg: N/A

1530%

#893

Core i5-480M

MSRP: $81|Avg: $77

1405%

#894

Core i5-460M

MSRP: $80|Avg: $129

1399%

#895

Core i5-2540M

MSRP: $266|Avg: $10

1386%

#897

Core i5-450M

MSRP: $32|Avg: $31

1338%

#898

Core i3-380M

MSRP: $49|Avg: $25

1283%

#899

Core i5-430M

MSRP: N/A|Avg: $33

1281%

#900

Core 2 Duo T6600

MSRP: N/A|Avg: $4

1247%

#903

FX-8800P

MSRP: $150|Avg: $45

100%

#905

Core i7-8809G

MSRP: $450|Avg: $450

99%

#911

Core i7-6820HK

MSRP: $378|Avg: N/A

98%

#912

Athlon II Neo K325

MSRP: $60|Avg: $25

98%

Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Comparison

About PassMark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

🚀 Performance Leadership

Generational Difference: This comparison involves processors from different technological eras. The Celeron J4105 (2017) utilizes 14 nm technology and DDR4, providing a fundamental performance advantage.

Insight	Celeron J4105	FX-8800P
Gaming	❌ Lower gaming performance	✅ Superior gaming performance
Workstation	❌ Weaker in multi-core tasks	✅ Better multi-core power
Price	✅ More affordable ($0)	⚠️ Higher cost ($45)
Longevity	✨ Modern (Goldmont Plus (2017) / 14 nm)	🛑 Legacy (Carrizo (2015−2018) / 28 nm)

💎 Value Proposition

The FX-8800P (2015) relies on 28 nm technology and DDR3-2133, placing it in a different performance category relative to modern standards.

Insight	Celeron J4105	FX-8800P
Cost Efficiency	❌ Lower cost efficiency	❌ Lower cost efficiency
Upfront Cost	✅ More affordable ($0)	⚠️ Higher cost ($45)

Performance Check

Paired with RTX 4090

To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Celeron J4105 Benchmark Check

FX-8800P Benchmark Check

Loading...

Check FPS for your specific build

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Celeron J4105 and FX-8800P

Celeron J4105

The Celeron J4105 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 11 December 2017 (7 years ago). It is based on the Goldmont Plus (2017) architecture. It features 4 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 1.5 GHz, with boost up to 2.5 GHz. L3 cache: 4 MB. L2 cache: 4 MB (total). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: FCBGA1090. Thermal design power (TDP): 10 Watt. Memory support: DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 2,820 points. Launch price was $107.

FX-8800P

The FX-8800P is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 2 June 2015 (10 years ago). It is based on the Carrizo (2015−2018) architecture. It features 4 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 2.1 GHz, with boost up to 3.4 GHz. L2 cache: 2048 kB. Built on 28 nm process technology. Socket: FP4. Thermal design power (TDP): 15 Watt. Memory support: DDR3-2133. Passmark benchmark score: 2,833 points. Launch price was $69.

⚡

Processing Power

Both the Celeron J4105 and FX-8800P share an identical 4-core/4-thread configuration. Boost clocks reach 2.5 GHz on the Celeron J4105 versus 3.4 GHz on the FX-8800P — a 30.5% clock advantage for the FX-8800P (base: 1.5 GHz vs 2.1 GHz). The Celeron J4105 uses the Goldmont Plus (2017) architecture (14 nm), while the FX-8800P uses Carrizo (2015−2018) (28 nm). In PassMark, the Celeron J4105 scores 2,820 against the FX-8800P's 2,833 — a 0.5% lead for the FX-8800P.

Feature	Celeron J4105	FX-8800P
Cores / Threads	4 / 4	4 / 4
Boost Clock	2.5 GHz	3.4 GHz+36%
Base Clock	1.5 GHz	2.1 GHz+40%
L3 Cache	4 MB	—
L2 Cache	4 MB (total)+100%	2048 kB
Process	14 nm-50%	28 nm
Architecture	Goldmont Plus (2017)	Carrizo (2015−2018)
PassMark	2,820	2,833

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Celeron J4105 uses the FCBGA1090 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the FX-8800P uses FP4 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

Feature	Celeron J4105	FX-8800P
Socket	FCBGA1090	FP4
PCIe Generation	PCIe 3.0	PCIe 3.0
Max RAM Speed	2400	—
Max RAM Capacity	8	—
RAM Channels	2	—
ECC Support	❌	—
PCIe Lanes	6	—

🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization: true (Celeron J4105) / not specified (FX-8800P). The Celeron J4105 includes integrated graphics (Intel UHD Graphics 600), while the FX-8800P requires a dedicated GPU. Direct competitor: Celeron J4105 rivals Ryzen Embedded R1305G.