Celeron J4105
VS
Core i5-4200M

Celeron J4105 vs Core i5-4200M

Intel

Celeron J4105

4 Cores4 Thrd10 WWMax: 2.5 GHz2017
VS
Intel

Core i5-4200M

2 Cores4 Thrd512 WWMax: 3.1 GHz2013

Performance Spectrum - CPU

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Celeron J4105 is positioned at rank 900 and the Core i5-4200M is on rank 1025, so the Celeron J4105 offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar Celeron J4105

#1
Ryzen 9 7950X
MSRP: $194|Avg: $20
20892%
#2
Core i9-10900T
MSRP: $120|Avg: $5
19741%
#3
Ryzen 3 PRO 4355GE
MSRP: $423|Avg: $5
14334%
#4
Ryzen Threadripper 3960X
MSRP: $1399|Avg: $85
4318%
#5
Ryzen 9 9950X
MSRP: $649|Avg: $129
3420%
#6
Ryzen 5 8400F
MSRP: $303|Avg: $55
2992%
#7
Ryzen 7 PRO 2700
MSRP: $299|Avg: $60
1714%
#8
Ryzen 5 2600X
MSRP: $229|Avg: $55
1691%
#9
Ryzen 3 PRO 5350G
MSRP: $150|Avg: $60
1540%
#10
Core Ultra 5 245KF
MSRP: $294|Avg: $189
1540%
#11
Ryzen 5 5500
MSRP: $159|Avg: $85
1523%
#12
Ryzen 5 3600
MSRP: $199|Avg: $80
1482%
#13
Core i3-9100E
MSRP: $202|Avg: $30
1461%
#14
Core Ultra 5 245K
MSRP: $319|Avg: $200
1455%
#15
Core i3-8300T
MSRP: $138|Avg: $25
1442%
#299
Core i9-7980XE
MSRP: $1999|Avg: $300
99%
#900
Celeron J4105
MSRP: N/A|Avg: N/A
100%
#902
Core i3-6100E
MSRP: $225|Avg: $50
99%
#903
Core i3-4330TE
MSRP: $138|Avg: $15
98%
#904
Pentium E5700
MSRP: $75|Avg: $15
98%
#906
Athlon II X3 420e
MSRP: $107|Avg: $15
98%
#907
Celeron E1500
MSRP: $53|Avg: $5
97%
#909
Pentium G6950
MSRP: $87|Avg: $25
96%
#910
Pentium J4205
MSRP: $161|Avg: $161
96%
#911
Core i3-2120
MSRP: $138|Avg: $25
96%
#912
Pentium E6600
MSRP: $84|Avg: $50
95%
#913
Pentium G3460
MSRP: $149|Avg: $25
95%
#914
Pentium E5500
MSRP: $75|Avg: $25
95%
#915
Pentium E6700
MSRP: $86|Avg: $5
95%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Per Dollar Core i5-4200M

#1013
Atom x5-Z8300
MSRP: $20|Avg: N/A
2351%
#1014
Atom Z3735G
MSRP: $17|Avg: N/A
2317%
#1015
Core i5-480M
MSRP: $81|Avg: $77
2127%
#1016
Core i5-460M
MSRP: $80|Avg: $129
2117%
#1017
Core i5-2540M
MSRP: $266|Avg: $10
2098%
#1019
Core i5-450M
MSRP: $32|Avg: $31
2026%
#1020
Core i3-380M
MSRP: $49|Avg: $25
1942%
#1021
Core i5-430M
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $33
1939%
#1022
Core 2 Duo T6600
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $4
1887%
#1025
Core i5-4200M
MSRP: $225|Avg: N/A
100%
#1026
Celeron 1000M
MSRP: $86|Avg: N/A
100%
#1028
Celeron B840
MSRP: $86|Avg: $15
99%
#1029
Celeron M 743
MSRP: $107|Avg: $15
99%
#1030
Core i7-3612QM
MSRP: $378|Avg: N/A
99%
#1031
Pentium 967
MSRP: $134|Avg: $10
98%
#1032
Core i5-4400E
MSRP: $266|Avg: $50
98%
#1034
Pentium Dual Core T4400
MSRP: $107|Avg: $5
96%
#1037
Core i7-8665UE
MSRP: $409|Avg: $409
95%
#1038
Celeron T3300
MSRP: $86|Avg: $15
94%
#1039
Celeron Dual-Core T3300
MSRP: $86|Avg: $30
94%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Comparison

About PassMark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

🚀 Performance Leadership

Generational Difference: This comparison involves processors from different technological eras. The Celeron J4105 (2017) utilizes 14 nm technology and DDR4, providing a fundamental performance advantage.
InsightCeleron J4105Core i5-4200M
Gaming
Lower gaming performance
Superior gaming performance
Workstation
Better multi-core power
Weaker in multi-core tasks
Price
More affordable ($0)
⚠️ Higher cost ($225)
Longevity
✨ Modern (Goldmont Plus (2017) / 14 nm)
🛑 Legacy (Haswell (2013−2015) / 22 nm)

💎 Value Proposition

The Core i5-4200M (2013) relies on 22 nm technology and DDR3, placing it in a different performance category relative to modern standards.
InsightCeleron J4105Core i5-4200M
Cost Efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Upfront Cost
More affordable ($0)
⚠️ Higher cost ($225)

Performance Check

Paired with RTX 4090

To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Celeron J4105 and Core i5-4200M

Intel

Celeron J4105

The Celeron J4105 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 11 December 2017 (7 years ago). It is based on the Goldmont Plus (2017) architecture. It features 4 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 1.5 GHz, with boost up to 2.5 GHz. L3 cache: 4 MB. L2 cache: 4 MB (total). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: FCBGA1090. Thermal design power (TDP): 10 Watt. Memory support: DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 2,820 points. Launch price was $107.

Intel

Core i5-4200M

The Core i5-4200M is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 4 June 2013 (12 years ago). It is based on the Haswell (2013−2015) architecture. It features 2 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 2.5 GHz, with boost up to 3.1 GHz. L3 cache: 3 MB. L2 cache: 512 kB. Built on 22 nm process technology. Socket: PGA946. Thermal design power (TDP): 37 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 2,809 points. Launch price was $225.

Processing Power

The Celeron J4105 packs 4 cores / 4 threads, while the Core i5-4200M offers 2 cores / 4 threads — the Celeron J4105 has 2 more cores. Boost clocks reach 2.5 GHz on the Celeron J4105 versus 3.1 GHz on the Core i5-4200M — a 21.4% clock advantage for the Core i5-4200M (base: 1.5 GHz vs 2.5 GHz). The Celeron J4105 uses the Goldmont Plus (2017) architecture (14 nm), while the Core i5-4200M uses Haswell (2013−2015) (22 nm). In PassMark, the Celeron J4105 scores 2,820 against the Core i5-4200M's 2,809 — a 0.4% lead for the Celeron J4105. L3 cache: 4 MB on the Celeron J4105 vs 3 MB on the Core i5-4200M.

FeatureCeleron J4105Core i5-4200M
Cores / Threads
4 / 4+100%
2 / 4
Boost Clock
2.5 GHz
3.1 GHz+24%
Base Clock
1.5 GHz
2.5 GHz+67%
L3 Cache
4 MB+33%
3 MB
L2 Cache
4 MB (total)+700%
512 kB
Process
14 nm-36%
22 nm
Architecture
Goldmont Plus (2017)
Haswell (2013−2015)
PassMark
2,820
2,809
🧠

Memory & Platform

The Celeron J4105 uses the FCBGA1090 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Core i5-4200M uses PGA946 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches 2400 on the Celeron J4105 versus DDR3L-1600 on the Core i5-4200M — the Celeron J4105 supports 199.5% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The Core i5-4200M supports up to 32 GB of RAM compared to 8 120% more capacity for professional workloads. Both feature 2-channel memory with ECC support. PCIe lanes: 6 (Celeron J4105) vs 16 (Core i5-4200M) — the Core i5-4200M offers 10 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives.

FeatureCeleron J4105Core i5-4200M
Socket
FCBGA1090
PGA946
PCIe Generation
PCIe 3.0
PCIe 3.0
Max RAM Speed
2400+79900%
DDR3L-1600
Max RAM Capacity
8
32 GB+419430300%
RAM Channels
2
2
ECC Support
PCIe Lanes
6
16+167%
🔧

Advanced Features

Neither processor supports overclocking. Virtualization support: true (Celeron J4105) vs VT-x, VT-d (Core i5-4200M). Both include integrated graphics Intel UHD Graphics 600 (Celeron J4105) and HD Graphics 4600 (Core i5-4200M) — useful as a fallback for troubleshooting or display output without a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Core i5-4200M targets Mobile. Direct competitor: Celeron J4105 rivals Ryzen Embedded R1305G.

FeatureCeleron J4105Core i5-4200M
Integrated GPU
Yes
Yes
IGPU Model
Intel UHD Graphics 600
HD Graphics 4600
Unlocked
No
No
AVX-512
No
No
Virtualization
true
VT-x, VT-d
Target Use
Mobile