Celeron J4105 vs Xeon X5470

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Celeron J4105 vs Xeon X5470 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Celeron J4105 vs Xeon X5470: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Celeron J4105

2017

Why buy it

✅Draws 10W instead of 120W, a 110W reduction.
✅100+% more PCIe lanes (6 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
✅Integrated graphics onboard with Intel UHD Graphics 600, while Xeon X5470 needs a discrete GPU.

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Xeon X5470 across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Lower PassMark (2,820 vs 2,869).
❌Smaller total L3 cache (4 MB vs 12 MB).

Xeon X5470

2008

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +8.0% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅+200% larger total L3 cache (12 MB vs 4 MB).

Trade-offs

❌1100% higher power demand at 120W vs 10W.
❌No integrated graphics, while Celeron J4105 can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.

Quick Answers

So, is Xeon X5470 better than Celeron J4105?

Not really, because they are built for different jobs. Xeon X5470 makes more sense for workstation-style multi-core throughput, while Celeron J4105 is the more practical desktop choice for gaming, platform cost, and everyday use.

Which one is better for gaming?

If gaming is the priority, Xeon X5470 is the better pick. According to our tests, it delivers 8.0% more average FPS across 50 shared CPU game tests.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Xeon X5470 is the stronger fit. You are getting 1.7% better PassMark, backed by 4 cores and 4 threads. It also has the larger cache pool with 200% larger total L3 cache (12 MB vs 4 MB).

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Xeon X5470 still makes the most sense overall. Xeon X5470 comes in at an unclear MSRP at unclear MSRP versus unclear MSRP, and it still gives you a 8.0% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Celeron J4105 makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2017 vs 2008). That makes it the safer long-term bet.

Celeron J4105 vs Xeon X5470 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Celeron J4105

The Celeron J4105 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 11 December 2017 (7 years ago). It is based on the Goldmont Plus (2017) architecture. It features 4 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 1.5 GHz, with boost up to 2.5 GHz. L3 cache: 4 MB. L2 cache: 4 MB (total). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: FCBGA1090. Thermal design power (TDP): 10 Watt. Memory support: DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 2,820 points. Launch price was $107.

Xeon X5470

The Xeon X5470 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 8 September 2008 (17 years ago). It is based on the Harpertown (2007−2008) architecture. It features 4 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 3.33 GHz, with boost up to 0.33 GHz. L3 cache: 12 MB L2 Cache. L2 cache: 6 MB (total). Built on 45 nm process technology. Socket: LGA771. Thermal design power (TDP): 120 Watt. Memory support: DDR2, DDR3 Depends on motherboard. Passmark benchmark score: 2,869 points. Launch price was $1,386.

⚡

Processing Power

Both the Celeron J4105 and Xeon X5470 share an identical 4-core/4-thread configuration. Boost clocks reach 2.5 GHz on the Celeron J4105 versus 0.33 GHz on the Xeon X5470 — a 153.4% clock advantage for the Celeron J4105 (base: 1.5 GHz vs 3.33 GHz). The Celeron J4105 uses the Goldmont Plus (2017) architecture (14 nm), while the Xeon X5470 uses Harpertown (2007−2008) (45 nm). In PassMark, the Celeron J4105 scores 2,820 against the Xeon X5470's 2,869 — a 1.7% lead for the Xeon X5470. L3 cache: 4 MB on the Celeron J4105 vs 12 MB L2 Cache on the Xeon X5470.

Feature	Celeron J4105	Xeon X5470
Cores / Threads	4 / 4	4 / 4
Boost Clock	2.5 GHz+658%	0.33 GHz
Base Clock	1.5 GHz	3.33 GHz+122%
L3 Cache	4 MB	12 MB L2 Cache+200%
L2 Cache	4 MB (total)	6 MB (total)+50%
Process	14 nm-69%	45 nm
Architecture	Goldmont Plus (2017)	Harpertown (2007−2008)
PassMark	2,820	2,869+2%

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Celeron J4105 uses the FCBGA1090 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Xeon X5470 uses LGA771 (PCIe 2.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

Feature	Celeron J4105	Xeon X5470
Socket	FCBGA1090	LGA771
PCIe Generation	PCIe 3.0+50%	PCIe 2.0
Max RAM Speed	2400	—
Max RAM Capacity	8	—
RAM Channels	2	—
ECC Support	No	—
PCIe Lanes	6	—

🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization: true (Celeron J4105) / not specified (Xeon X5470). The Celeron J4105 includes integrated graphics (Intel UHD Graphics 600), while the Xeon X5470 requires a dedicated GPU. Direct competitor: Celeron J4105 rivals Ryzen Embedded R1305G.