Celeron J4105 vs Phenom II X2 X640 BE

Celeron J4105 vs Phenom II X2 X640 BE Performance Spectrum

Celeron J4105

4 / 4

2,820

0.0%

2,839

+0.7%

Ryzen Threadripper 3990X

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Celeron J4105 vs Phenom II X2 X640 BE FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Celeron J4105 vs Phenom II X2 X640 BE: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Celeron J4105

2017

Why buy it

✅100+% more PCIe lanes (6 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
✅Integrated graphics onboard with Intel UHD Graphics 600, while Phenom II X2 X640 BE needs a discrete GPU.

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Phenom II X2 X640 BE across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Lower PassMark (2,820 vs 2,839).
❌400% higher power demand at 10W vs 2W.

Phenom II X2 X640 BE

2011

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +4.1% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅Draws 2W instead of 10W, a 8W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌No integrated graphics, while Celeron J4105 can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.

Quick Answers

So, is Phenom II X2 X640 BE better than Celeron J4105?

Yes. Phenom II X2 X640 BE is the better all-around CPU here. It gives you a 4.1% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data and 0.7% better PassMark, which is enough to make it the stronger overall pick.

Which one is better for gaming?

If gaming is the priority, Phenom II X2 X640 BE is the better pick. According to our tests, it delivers 4.1% more average FPS across 50 shared CPU game tests.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Phenom II X2 X640 BE is the stronger fit. You are getting 0.7% better PassMark, backed by 2 cores and 2 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Phenom II X2 X640 BE still makes the most sense overall. Phenom II X2 X640 BE comes in at an unclear MSRP at unclear MSRP versus unclear MSRP, and it still gives you a 4.1% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Celeron J4105 makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2017 vs 2011). That makes it the safer long-term bet.

Celeron J4105 vs Phenom II X2 X640 BE Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Celeron J4105

The Celeron J4105 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 11 December 2017 (7 years ago). It is based on the Goldmont Plus (2017) architecture. It features 4 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 1.5 GHz, with boost up to 2.5 GHz. L3 cache: 4 MB. L2 cache: 4 MB (total). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: FCBGA1090. Thermal design power (TDP): 10 Watt. Memory support: DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 2,820 points. Launch price was $107.

Phenom II X2 X640 BE

The Phenom II X2 X640 BE is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 2009-01-01. It is based on the Champlain (2010−2011) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Max frequency: 3.2 GHz. L2 cache: 2 MB. Built on 45 nm process technology. Socket: S1. Thermal design power (TDP): 2 MB. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 2,839 points. Launch price was $149.

⚡

Processing Power

The Celeron J4105 packs 4 cores / 4 threads, while the Phenom II X2 X640 BE offers 2 cores / 2 threads — the Celeron J4105 has 2 more cores. Boost clocks reach 2.5 GHz on the Celeron J4105 versus 3.2 GHz on the Phenom II X2 X640 BE — a 24.6% clock advantage for the Phenom II X2 X640 BE. The Celeron J4105 uses the Goldmont Plus (2017) architecture (14 nm), while the Phenom II X2 X640 BE uses Champlain (2010−2011) (45 nm). In PassMark, the Celeron J4105 scores 2,820 against the Phenom II X2 X640 BE's 2,839 — a 0.7% lead for the Phenom II X2 X640 BE.

Feature	Celeron J4105	Phenom II X2 X640 BE
Cores / Threads	4 / 4+100%	2 / 2
Boost Clock	2.5 GHz	3.2 GHz+28%
Base Clock	1.5 GHz	—
L3 Cache	4 MB	—
L2 Cache	4 MB (total)+100%	2 MB
Process	14 nm-69%	45 nm
Architecture	Goldmont Plus (2017)	Champlain (2010−2011)
PassMark	2,820	2,839

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Celeron J4105 uses the FCBGA1090 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Phenom II X2 X640 BE uses S1 (PCIe 2.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

Feature	Celeron J4105	Phenom II X2 X640 BE
Socket	FCBGA1090	S1
PCIe Generation	PCIe 3.0+50%	PCIe 2.0
Max RAM Speed	2400	—
Max RAM Capacity	8	—
RAM Channels	2	—
ECC Support	No	—
PCIe Lanes	6	—

🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization: true (Celeron J4105) / not specified (Phenom II X2 X640 BE). The Celeron J4105 includes integrated graphics (Intel UHD Graphics 600), while the Phenom II X2 X640 BE requires a dedicated GPU. Direct competitor: Celeron J4105 rivals Ryzen Embedded R1305G.