Celeron J4105
VS
Core 2 Duo SP9600

Celeron J4105 vs Core 2 Duo SP9600

Intel

Celeron J4105

4 Cores4 Thrd10 WWMax: 2.5 GHz2017
VS
Intel

Core 2 Duo SP9600

2 Cores2 Thrd6 WWMax: 2.53 GHz2009

Performance Spectrum - CPU

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Celeron J4105 is positioned at rank 900 and the Core 2 Duo SP9600 is on rank 138, so the Core 2 Duo SP9600 offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar Celeron J4105

#1
Ryzen 9 7950X
MSRP: $194|Avg: $20
20892%
#2
Core i9-10900T
MSRP: $120|Avg: $5
19741%
#3
Ryzen 3 PRO 4355GE
MSRP: $423|Avg: $5
14334%
#4
Ryzen Threadripper 3960X
MSRP: $1399|Avg: $85
4318%
#5
Ryzen 9 9950X
MSRP: $649|Avg: $129
3420%
#6
Ryzen 5 8400F
MSRP: $303|Avg: $55
2992%
#7
Ryzen 7 PRO 2700
MSRP: $299|Avg: $60
1714%
#8
Ryzen 5 2600X
MSRP: $229|Avg: $55
1691%
#9
Ryzen 3 PRO 5350G
MSRP: $150|Avg: $60
1540%
#10
Core Ultra 5 245KF
MSRP: $294|Avg: $189
1540%
#11
Ryzen 5 5500
MSRP: $159|Avg: $85
1523%
#12
Ryzen 5 3600
MSRP: $199|Avg: $80
1482%
#13
Core i3-9100E
MSRP: $202|Avg: $30
1461%
#14
Core Ultra 5 245K
MSRP: $319|Avg: $200
1455%
#15
Core i3-8300T
MSRP: $138|Avg: $25
1442%
#299
Core i9-7980XE
MSRP: $1999|Avg: $300
99%
#900
Celeron J4105
MSRP: N/A|Avg: N/A
100%
#902
Core i3-6100E
MSRP: $225|Avg: $50
99%
#903
Core i3-4330TE
MSRP: $138|Avg: $15
98%
#904
Pentium E5700
MSRP: $75|Avg: $15
98%
#906
Athlon II X3 420e
MSRP: $107|Avg: $15
98%
#907
Celeron E1500
MSRP: $53|Avg: $5
97%
#909
Pentium G6950
MSRP: $87|Avg: $25
96%
#910
Pentium J4205
MSRP: $161|Avg: $161
96%
#911
Core i3-2120
MSRP: $138|Avg: $25
96%
#912
Pentium E6600
MSRP: $84|Avg: $50
95%
#913
Pentium G3460
MSRP: $149|Avg: $25
95%
#914
Pentium E5500
MSRP: $75|Avg: $25
95%
#915
Pentium E6700
MSRP: $86|Avg: $5
95%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Per Dollar Core 2 Duo SP9600

#36
Core i5-11500B
MSRP: $185|Avg: $185
98%
#126
Atom x5-Z8300
MSRP: $20|Avg: N/A
310%
#127
Atom Z3735G
MSRP: $17|Avg: N/A
306%
#128
Core i5-480M
MSRP: $81|Avg: $77
281%
#129
Core i5-460M
MSRP: $80|Avg: $129
279%
#130
Core i5-2540M
MSRP: $266|Avg: $10
277%
#132
Core i5-450M
MSRP: $32|Avg: $31
267%
#133
Core i3-380M
MSRP: $49|Avg: $25
256%
#134
Core i5-430M
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $33
256%
#135
Core 2 Duo T6600
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $4
249%
#138
Core 2 Duo SP9600
MSRP: $316|Avg: N/A
100%
#140
Core 2 Duo P8700
MSRP: $241|Avg: $85
99%
#147
Atom N2800
MSRP: $47|Avg: $3
97%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Comparison

About PassMark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

🚀 Performance Leadership

Generational Difference: This comparison involves processors from different technological eras. The Celeron J4105 (2017) utilizes 14 nm technology and DDR4, providing a fundamental performance advantage.
InsightCeleron J4105Core 2 Duo SP9600
Gaming
Lower gaming performance
Superior gaming performance
Workstation
Weaker in multi-core tasks
Better multi-core power
Price
More affordable ($0)
⚠️ Higher cost ($316)
Longevity
✨ Modern (Goldmont Plus (2017) / 14 nm)
🛑 Legacy (Penryn (2008−2011) / 45 nm)

💎 Value Proposition

The Core 2 Duo SP9600 (2009) relies on 45 nm technology and older memory, placing it in a different performance category relative to modern standards.
InsightCeleron J4105Core 2 Duo SP9600
Cost Efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Upfront Cost
More affordable ($0)
⚠️ Higher cost ($316)

Performance Check

Paired with RTX 4090

To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Celeron J4105 and Core 2 Duo SP9600

Intel

Celeron J4105

The Celeron J4105 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 11 December 2017 (7 years ago). It is based on the Goldmont Plus (2017) architecture. It features 4 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 1.5 GHz, with boost up to 2.5 GHz. L3 cache: 4 MB. L2 cache: 4 MB (total). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: FCBGA1090. Thermal design power (TDP): 10 Watt. Memory support: DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 2,820 points. Launch price was $107.

Intel

Core 2 Duo SP9600

The Core 2 Duo SP9600 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 1 March 2009 (16 years ago). It is based on the Penryn (2008−2011) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency is 2.53 GHz, with boost up to 2.53 GHz. L3 cache: 6 MB L2 Cache. L2 cache: 6 MB. Built on 45 nm process technology. Socket: BGA479. Thermal design power (TDP): 25 Watt. Passmark benchmark score: 2,836 points. Launch price was $316.

Processing Power

The Celeron J4105 packs 4 cores / 4 threads, while the Core 2 Duo SP9600 offers 2 cores / 2 threads — the Celeron J4105 has 2 more cores. Boost clocks reach 2.5 GHz on the Celeron J4105 versus 2.53 GHz on the Core 2 Duo SP9600 — a 1.2% clock advantage for the Core 2 Duo SP9600 (base: 1.5 GHz vs 2.53 GHz). The Celeron J4105 uses the Goldmont Plus (2017) architecture (14 nm), while the Core 2 Duo SP9600 uses Penryn (2008−2011) (45 nm). In PassMark, the Celeron J4105 scores 2,820 against the Core 2 Duo SP9600's 2,836 — a 0.6% lead for the Core 2 Duo SP9600. L3 cache: 4 MB on the Celeron J4105 vs 6 MB L2 Cache on the Core 2 Duo SP9600.

FeatureCeleron J4105Core 2 Duo SP9600
Cores / Threads
4 / 4+100%
2 / 2
Boost Clock
2.5 GHz
2.53 GHz+1%
Base Clock
1.5 GHz
2.53 GHz+69%
L3 Cache
4 MB
6 MB L2 Cache+50%
L2 Cache
4 MB (total)
6 MB+50%
Process
14 nm-69%
45 nm
Architecture
Goldmont Plus (2017)
Penryn (2008−2011)
PassMark
2,820
2,836
🧠

Memory & Platform

The Celeron J4105 uses the FCBGA1090 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Core 2 Duo SP9600 uses BGA479 (PCIe 1.1) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

FeatureCeleron J4105Core 2 Duo SP9600
Socket
FCBGA1090
BGA479
PCIe Generation
PCIe 3.0+173%
PCIe 1.1
Max RAM Speed
2400
Max RAM Capacity
8
RAM Channels
2
ECC Support
PCIe Lanes
6
🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization: true (Celeron J4105) / not specified (Core 2 Duo SP9600). The Celeron J4105 includes integrated graphics (Intel UHD Graphics 600), while the Core 2 Duo SP9600 requires a dedicated GPU. Direct competitor: Celeron J4105 rivals Ryzen Embedded R1305G.

FeatureCeleron J4105Core 2 Duo SP9600
Integrated GPU
Yes
IGPU Model
Intel UHD Graphics 600
Unlocked
No
AVX-512
No
Virtualization
true