Core i5-4200M vs FX-8800P

Core i5-4200M vs FX-8800P Performance Spectrum

Core i5-4200M

2 / 4

2,809

0.0%

2,833

+0.9%

Ryzen Threadripper 3990X

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Core i5-4200M vs FX-8800P FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Core i5-4200M vs FX-8800P: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Core i5-4200M

2013

Why buy it

✅100+% more PCIe lanes (16 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
✅Integrated graphics onboard with HD Graphics 4600, while FX-8800P needs a discrete GPU.

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than FX-8800P across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Lower PassMark (2,809 vs 2,833).
❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 12.5 vs 18.9 PassMark/$ ($225 MSRP vs $150 MSRP).
❌3313.3% higher power demand at 512W vs 15W.

FX-8800P

2015

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +4.7% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅Costs $75 less on MSRP ($150 MSRP vs $225 MSRP).
✅Delivers 51.3% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 18.9 vs 12.5 PassMark/$ ($150 MSRP vs $225 MSRP).
✅Draws 15W instead of 512W, a 497W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌No integrated graphics, while Core i5-4200M can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.

Quick Answers

So, is FX-8800P better than Core i5-4200M?

Yes. FX-8800P is the better all-around CPU here. It gives you a 4.7% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data, 0.9% better PassMark, and the stronger long-term platform, which is enough to make it the stronger overall pick.

Which one is better for gaming?

If gaming is the priority, FX-8800P is the better pick. According to our tests, it delivers 4.7% more average FPS across 50 shared CPU game tests.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, FX-8800P is the stronger fit. You are getting 0.9% better PassMark, backed by 4 cores and 4 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

FX-8800P is the better buy right now. FX-8800P comes in $75 cheaper on MSRP at $150 MSRP versus $225 MSRP, and it still gives you a 4.7% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. It is also 51.3% better value on MSRP (18.9 vs 12.5 PassMark/$), so you are getting the faster CPU without taking a value hit on paper.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

FX-8800P makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2015 vs 2013) and more multi-core headroom with 4 cores / 4 threads instead of 2/4. That extra compute headroom is more likely to matter as games, background tasks, and creator workloads get heavier.

Core i5-4200M vs FX-8800P Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Core i5-4200M

The Core i5-4200M is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 4 June 2013 (12 years ago). It is based on the Haswell (2013−2015) architecture. It features 2 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 2.5 GHz, with boost up to 3.1 GHz. L3 cache: 3 MB. L2 cache: 512 kB. Built on 22 nm process technology. Socket: PGA946. Thermal design power (TDP): 37 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 2,809 points. Launch price was $225.

FX-8800P

The FX-8800P is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 2 June 2015 (10 years ago). It is based on the Carrizo (2015−2018) architecture. It features 4 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 2.1 GHz, with boost up to 3.4 GHz. L2 cache: 2048 kB. Built on 28 nm process technology. Socket: FP4. Thermal design power (TDP): 15 Watt. Memory support: DDR3-2133. Passmark benchmark score: 2,833 points. Launch price was $69.

⚡

Processing Power

The Core i5-4200M packs 2 cores / 4 threads, while the FX-8800P offers 4 cores / 4 threads — the FX-8800P has 2 more cores. Boost clocks reach 3.1 GHz on the Core i5-4200M versus 3.4 GHz on the FX-8800P — a 9.2% clock advantage for the FX-8800P (base: 2.5 GHz vs 2.1 GHz). The Core i5-4200M uses the Haswell (2013−2015) architecture (22 nm), while the FX-8800P uses Carrizo (2015−2018) (28 nm). In PassMark, the Core i5-4200M scores 2,809 against the FX-8800P's 2,833 — a 0.9% lead for the FX-8800P.

Feature	Core i5-4200M	FX-8800P
Cores / Threads	2 / 4	4 / 4+100%
Boost Clock	3.1 GHz	3.4 GHz+10%
Base Clock	2.5 GHz+19%	2.1 GHz
L3 Cache	3 MB	—
L2 Cache	512 kB	2048 kB+300%
Process	22 nm-21%	28 nm
Architecture	Haswell (2013−2015)	Carrizo (2015−2018)
PassMark	2,809	2,833

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Core i5-4200M uses the PGA946 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the FX-8800P uses FP4 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

Feature	Core i5-4200M	FX-8800P
Socket	PGA946	FP4
PCIe Generation	PCIe 3.0	PCIe 3.0
Max RAM Speed	DDR3L-1600	—
Max RAM Capacity	32 GB	—
RAM Channels	2	—
ECC Support	No	—
PCIe Lanes	16	—

🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization: VT-x, VT-d (Core i5-4200M) / not specified (FX-8800P). The Core i5-4200M includes integrated graphics (HD Graphics 4600), while the FX-8800P requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Core i5-4200M targets Mobile.

Feature	Core i5-4200M	FX-8800P
Integrated GPU	Yes	—
IGPU Model	HD Graphics 4600	—
Unlocked	No	—
AVX-512	No	—
Virtualization	VT-x, VT-d	—
Target Use	Mobile	—

💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the Core i5-4200M was priced at $225, while the FX-8800P came in at $150. On launch pricing ($225 vs $150), FX-8800P was $75 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Core i5-4200M delivers 12.5 pts/$ vs 18.9 pts/$ for the FX-8800P — making the FX-8800P the 40.8% better value option.

Feature	Core i5-4200M	FX-8800P
MSRP	$225	$150-33%
Performance per Dollar	12.5	18.9+51%
Release Date	2013	2015

Search Core i5-4200M on Amazon

Search FX-8800P on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.