Core i5-4200M vs Core i7-920

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Core i5-4200M vs Core i7-920 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Core i5-4200M vs Core i7-920: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Core i5-4200M

2013

Why buy it

✅Costs $59 less on MSRP ($225 MSRP vs $284 MSRP).
✅Delivers 23.7% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 12.5 vs 10.1 PassMark/$ ($225 MSRP vs $284 MSRP).
✅100+% more PCIe lanes (16 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
✅Integrated graphics onboard with HD Graphics 4600, while Core i7-920 needs a discrete GPU.

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Core i7-920 across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Lower PassMark (2,809 vs 2,866).
❌Smaller total L3 cache (3 MB vs 8 MB).
❌51100% higher power demand at 512W vs 1W.

Core i7-920

2008

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +11.3% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅+166.7% larger total L3 cache (8 MB vs 3 MB).
✅Draws 1W instead of 512W, a 511W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 10.1 vs 12.5 PassMark/$ ($284 MSRP vs $225 MSRP).
❌No integrated graphics, while Core i5-4200M can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.

Quick Answers

So, is Core i7-920 better than Core i5-4200M?

Yes. Core i7-920 is the better all-around CPU here. It gives you a 11.3% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data and 2% better PassMark, which is enough to make it the stronger overall pick.

Which one is better for gaming?

If gaming is the priority, Core i7-920 is the better pick. According to our tests, it delivers 11.3% more average FPS across 50 shared CPU game tests.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Core i7-920 is the stronger fit. You are getting 2% better PassMark, backed by 4 cores and 8 threads. It also has the larger cache pool with 166.7% larger total L3 cache (8 MB vs 3 MB).

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Core i7-920 is still the much better call for a fresh build. Core i7-920 comes in 26.2% more expensive on MSRP at $284 MSRP versus $225 MSRP, and it still gives you a 11.3% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. Core i5-4200M only looks stronger on raw value math because it is extremely cheap, but that usually means used-market pricing on an obsolete 2013 platform. Even with 23.7% better value on paper (12.5 vs 10.1 PassMark/$), it really only makes sense as a cheap stopgap or a niche existing-platform option for someone already on PGA946.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Core i5-4200M makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2013 vs 2008). That makes it the safer long-term bet.

Core i5-4200M vs Core i7-920 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Core i5-4200M

The Core i5-4200M is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 4 June 2013 (12 years ago). It is based on the Haswell (2013−2015) architecture. It features 2 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 2.5 GHz, with boost up to 3.1 GHz. L3 cache: 3 MB. L2 cache: 512 kB. Built on 22 nm process technology. Socket: PGA946. Thermal design power (TDP): 37 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 2,809 points. Launch price was $225.

Core i7-920

The Core i7-920 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in Novembro 2008 (17 years ago). It is based on the Bloomfield (2008−2010) architecture. It features 4 cores and 8 threads. Base frequency is 2.66 GHz, with boost up to 2.93 GHz. L3 cache: 8 MB (total). L2 cache: 256 kB (per core). Built on 45 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1366. Thermal design power (TDP): 130 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 2,866 points. Launch price was $340.

⚡

Processing Power

The Core i5-4200M packs 2 cores / 4 threads, while the Core i7-920 offers 4 cores / 8 threads — the Core i7-920 has 2 more cores. Boost clocks reach 3.1 GHz on the Core i5-4200M versus 2.93 GHz on the Core i7-920 — a 5.6% clock advantage for the Core i5-4200M (base: 2.5 GHz vs 2.66 GHz). The Core i5-4200M uses the Haswell (2013−2015) architecture (22 nm), while the Core i7-920 uses Bloomfield (2008−2010) (45 nm). In PassMark, the Core i5-4200M scores 2,809 against the Core i7-920's 2,866 — a 2% lead for the Core i7-920. L3 cache: 3 MB on the Core i5-4200M vs 8 MB (total) on the Core i7-920.

Feature	Core i5-4200M	Core i7-920
Cores / Threads	2 / 4	4 / 8+100%
Boost Clock	3.1 GHz+6%	2.93 GHz
Base Clock	2.5 GHz	2.66 GHz+6%
L3 Cache	3 MB	8 MB (total)+167%
L2 Cache	512 kB+100%	256 kB (per core)
Process	22 nm-51%	45 nm
Architecture	Haswell (2013−2015)	Bloomfield (2008−2010)
PassMark	2,809	2,866+2%

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Core i5-4200M uses the PGA946 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Core i7-920 uses LGA1366 (PCIe 2.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

Feature	Core i5-4200M	Core i7-920
Socket	PGA946	LGA1366
PCIe Generation	PCIe 3.0+50%	PCIe 2.0
Max RAM Speed	DDR3L-1600	—
Max RAM Capacity	32 GB	—
RAM Channels	2	—
ECC Support	No	—
PCIe Lanes	16	—

🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization: VT-x, VT-d (Core i5-4200M) / not specified (Core i7-920). The Core i5-4200M includes integrated graphics (HD Graphics 4600), while the Core i7-920 requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Core i5-4200M targets Mobile.

Feature	Core i5-4200M	Core i7-920
Integrated GPU	Yes	—
IGPU Model	HD Graphics 4600	—
Unlocked	No	—
AVX-512	No	—
Virtualization	VT-x, VT-d	—
Target Use	Mobile	—

💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the Core i5-4200M was priced at $225, while the Core i7-920 came in at $284. On launch pricing ($225 vs $284), Core i5-4200M was $59 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Core i5-4200M delivers 12.5 pts/$ vs 10.1 pts/$ for the Core i7-920 — making the Core i5-4200M the 21.2% better value option.

Feature	Core i5-4200M	Core i7-920
MSRP	$225-21%	$284
Performance per Dollar	12.5+24%	10.1
Release Date	2013	2008

Search Core i5-4200M on Amazon

Search Core i7-920 on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.