
Core 2 Duo SP9600

Core i5-4200M
Core 2 Duo SP9600 vs Core i5-4200M Performance Spectrum
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Core 2 Duo SP9600 vs Core i5-4200M FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Valorant

Among Us

Apex Legends

ARC Raiders

Baldur's Gate 3

Call of Duty: Black Ops 6
Core 2 Duo SP9600 vs Core i5-4200M: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.
Core 2 Duo SP9600
2009Why buy it
- ✅+1% higher PassMark.
- ✅+100% larger total L3 cache (6 MB vs 3 MB).
- ✅Draws 6W instead of 512W, a 506W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 9.0 vs 12.5 PassMark/$ ($316 MSRP vs $225 MSRP).
- ❌No integrated graphics, while Core i5-4200M can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.
Core i5-4200M
2013Why buy it
- ✅Costs $91 less on MSRP ($225 MSRP vs $316 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 39.1% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 12.5 vs 9.0 PassMark/$ ($225 MSRP vs $316 MSRP).
- ✅100+% more PCIe lanes (16 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
- ✅Integrated graphics onboard with HD Graphics 4600, while Core 2 Duo SP9600 needs a discrete GPU.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark (2,809 vs 2,836).
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (3 MB vs 6 MB).
- ❌8433.3% higher power demand at 512W vs 6W.
Quick Answers
So, is Core i5-4200M better than Core 2 Duo SP9600?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Core 2 Duo SP9600 vs Core i5-4200M Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Core 2 Duo SP9600
The Core 2 Duo SP9600 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 1 March 2009 (16 years ago). It is based on the Penryn (2008−2011) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency is 2.53 GHz, with boost up to 2.53 GHz. L3 cache: 6 MB L2 Cache. L2 cache: 6 MB. Built on 45 nm process technology. Socket: BGA479. Thermal design power (TDP): 25 Watt. Passmark benchmark score: 2,836 points. Launch price was $316.

Core i5-4200M
The Core i5-4200M is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 4 June 2013 (12 years ago). It is based on the Haswell (2013−2015) architecture. It features 2 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 2.5 GHz, with boost up to 3.1 GHz. L3 cache: 3 MB. L2 cache: 512 kB. Built on 22 nm process technology. Socket: PGA946. Thermal design power (TDP): 37 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 2,809 points. Launch price was $225.
Processing Power
The Core 2 Duo SP9600 packs 2 cores / 2 threads, matching the Core i5-4200M's 2 cores. Boost clocks reach 2.53 GHz on the Core 2 Duo SP9600 versus 3.1 GHz on the Core i5-4200M — a 20.2% clock advantage for the Core i5-4200M (base: 2.53 GHz vs 2.5 GHz). The Core 2 Duo SP9600 uses the Penryn (2008−2011) architecture (45 nm), while the Core i5-4200M uses Haswell (2013−2015) (22 nm). In PassMark, the Core 2 Duo SP9600 scores 2,836 against the Core i5-4200M's 2,809 — a 1% lead for the Core 2 Duo SP9600. L3 cache: 6 MB L2 Cache on the Core 2 Duo SP9600 vs 3 MB on the Core i5-4200M.
| Feature | Core 2 Duo SP9600 | Core i5-4200M |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 2 / 2 | 2 / 4 |
| Boost Clock | 2.53 GHz | 3.1 GHz+23% |
| Base Clock | 2.53 GHz+1% | 2.5 GHz |
| L3 Cache | 6 MB L2 Cache+100% | 3 MB |
| L2 Cache | 6 MB+1100% | 512 kB |
| Process | 45 nm | 22 nm-51% |
| Architecture | Penryn (2008−2011) | Haswell (2013−2015) |
| PassMark | 2,836 | 2,809 |
Memory & Platform
The Core 2 Duo SP9600 uses the BGA479 socket (PCIe 1.1), while the Core i5-4200M uses PGA946 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.
| Feature | Core 2 Duo SP9600 | Core i5-4200M |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | BGA479 | PGA946 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 1.1 | PCIe 3.0+173% |
| Max RAM Speed | — | DDR3L-1600 |
| Max RAM Capacity | — | 32 GB |
| RAM Channels | — | 2 |
| ECC Support | — | No |
| PCIe Lanes | — | 16 |
Advanced Features
Virtualization: not specified (Core 2 Duo SP9600) / VT-x, VT-d (Core i5-4200M). The Core i5-4200M includes integrated graphics (HD Graphics 4600), while the Core 2 Duo SP9600 requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Core i5-4200M targets Mobile.
| Feature | Core 2 Duo SP9600 | Core i5-4200M |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | — | Yes |
| IGPU Model | — | HD Graphics 4600 |
| Unlocked | — | No |
| AVX-512 | — | No |
| Virtualization | — | VT-x, VT-d |
| Target Use | — | Mobile |
Value Analysis
At launch, the Core 2 Duo SP9600 was priced at $316, while the Core i5-4200M came in at $225. On launch pricing ($316 vs $225), Core i5-4200M was $91 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Core 2 Duo SP9600 delivers 9.0 pts/$ vs 12.5 pts/$ for the Core i5-4200M — making the Core i5-4200M the 32.7% better value option.
| Feature | Core 2 Duo SP9600 | Core i5-4200M |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $316 | $225-29% |
| Performance per Dollar | 9.0 | 12.5+39% |
| Release Date | 2009 | 2013 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.














