Core 2 Duo SP9600 vs Core i5-4200M

Intel

Core 2 Duo SP9600

2 Cores2 Thrd6 WWMax: 2.53 GHz2009
Similar parts
·······
VS
Intel

Core i5-4200M

2 Cores4 Thrd512 WWMax: 3.1 GHz2013
Similar parts
·······

Core 2 Duo SP9600 vs Core i5-4200M Performance Spectrum

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Core 2 Duo SP9600 vs Core i5-4200M FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Core 2 Duo SP9600 vs Core i5-4200M: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Core 2 Duo SP9600

2009

Why buy it

  • +1% higher PassMark.
  • +100% larger total L3 cache (6 MB vs 3 MB).
  • Draws 6W instead of 512W, a 506W reduction.

Trade-offs

  • Lower PassMark per dollar, at 9.0 vs 12.5 PassMark/$ ($316 MSRP vs $225 MSRP).
  • No integrated graphics, while Core i5-4200M can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.

Core i5-4200M

2013

Why buy it

  • Costs $91 less on MSRP ($225 MSRP vs $316 MSRP).
  • Delivers 39.1% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 12.5 vs 9.0 PassMark/$ ($225 MSRP vs $316 MSRP).
  • 100+% more PCIe lanes (16 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
  • Integrated graphics onboard with HD Graphics 4600, while Core 2 Duo SP9600 needs a discrete GPU.

Trade-offs

  • Lower PassMark (2,809 vs 2,836).
  • Smaller total L3 cache (3 MB vs 6 MB).
  • 8433.3% higher power demand at 512W vs 6W.

Quick Answers

So, is Core i5-4200M better than Core 2 Duo SP9600?
It depends on what you want from the system. For gaming, Core i5-4200M is ahead with a 0.4% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. For rendering, compiling, streaming, and heavier multitasking, Core 2 Duo SP9600 pulls ahead with 1% better PassMark. Core 2 Duo SP9600 also has the bigger cache pool with 100% larger total L3 cache (6 MB vs 3 MB).
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Core 2 Duo SP9600 is the stronger fit. You are getting 1% better PassMark, backed by 2 cores and 2 threads. It also has the larger cache pool with 100% larger total L3 cache (6 MB vs 3 MB).
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Core i5-4200M is the better buy right now. Core i5-4200M comes in $91 cheaper on MSRP at $225 MSRP versus $316 MSRP, and it still gives you a 0.4% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. The compromise is that Core 2 Duo SP9600 is still stronger for heavier multi-core work with 1% better PassMark. It is also 39.1% better value on MSRP (12.5 vs 9.0 PassMark/$), so you are getting the faster CPU without taking a value hit on paper.
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Core i5-4200M makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2013 vs 2009). That makes it the safer long-term bet.

Core 2 Duo SP9600 vs Core i5-4200M Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Intel

Core 2 Duo SP9600

The Core 2 Duo SP9600 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 1 March 2009 (16 years ago). It is based on the Penryn (2008−2011) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency is 2.53 GHz, with boost up to 2.53 GHz. L3 cache: 6 MB L2 Cache. L2 cache: 6 MB. Built on 45 nm process technology. Socket: BGA479. Thermal design power (TDP): 25 Watt. Passmark benchmark score: 2,836 points. Launch price was $316.

Intel

Core i5-4200M

The Core i5-4200M is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 4 June 2013 (12 years ago). It is based on the Haswell (2013−2015) architecture. It features 2 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 2.5 GHz, with boost up to 3.1 GHz. L3 cache: 3 MB. L2 cache: 512 kB. Built on 22 nm process technology. Socket: PGA946. Thermal design power (TDP): 37 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 2,809 points. Launch price was $225.

Processing Power

The Core 2 Duo SP9600 packs 2 cores / 2 threads, matching the Core i5-4200M's 2 cores. Boost clocks reach 2.53 GHz on the Core 2 Duo SP9600 versus 3.1 GHz on the Core i5-4200M — a 20.2% clock advantage for the Core i5-4200M (base: 2.53 GHz vs 2.5 GHz). The Core 2 Duo SP9600 uses the Penryn (2008−2011) architecture (45 nm), while the Core i5-4200M uses Haswell (2013−2015) (22 nm). In PassMark, the Core 2 Duo SP9600 scores 2,836 against the Core i5-4200M's 2,809 — a 1% lead for the Core 2 Duo SP9600. L3 cache: 6 MB L2 Cache on the Core 2 Duo SP9600 vs 3 MB on the Core i5-4200M.

FeatureCore 2 Duo SP9600Core i5-4200M
Cores / Threads
2 / 2
2 / 4
Boost Clock
2.53 GHz
3.1 GHz+23%
Base Clock
2.53 GHz+1%
2.5 GHz
L3 Cache
6 MB L2 Cache+100%
3 MB
L2 Cache
6 MB+1100%
512 kB
Process
45 nm
22 nm-51%
Architecture
Penryn (2008−2011)
Haswell (2013−2015)
PassMark
2,836
2,809
🧠

Memory & Platform

The Core 2 Duo SP9600 uses the BGA479 socket (PCIe 1.1), while the Core i5-4200M uses PGA946 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

FeatureCore 2 Duo SP9600Core i5-4200M
Socket
BGA479
PGA946
PCIe Generation
PCIe 1.1
PCIe 3.0+173%
Max RAM Speed
DDR3L-1600
Max RAM Capacity
32 GB
RAM Channels
2
ECC Support
No
PCIe Lanes
16
🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization: not specified (Core 2 Duo SP9600) / VT-x, VT-d (Core i5-4200M). The Core i5-4200M includes integrated graphics (HD Graphics 4600), while the Core 2 Duo SP9600 requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Core i5-4200M targets Mobile.

FeatureCore 2 Duo SP9600Core i5-4200M
Integrated GPU
Yes
IGPU Model
HD Graphics 4600
Unlocked
No
AVX-512
No
Virtualization
VT-x, VT-d
Target Use
Mobile
💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the Core 2 Duo SP9600 was priced at $316, while the Core i5-4200M came in at $225. On launch pricing ($316 vs $225), Core i5-4200M was $91 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Core 2 Duo SP9600 delivers 9.0 pts/$ vs 12.5 pts/$ for the Core i5-4200M — making the Core i5-4200M the 32.7% better value option.

FeatureCore 2 Duo SP9600Core i5-4200M
MSRP
$316
$225-29%
Performance per Dollar
9.0
12.5+39%
Release Date
2009
2013

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.