
Atom Z3735G

Core 2 Duo SP9600
Atom Z3735G vs Core 2 Duo SP9600 Performance Spectrum
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Atom Z3735G vs Core 2 Duo SP9600 FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Valorant

Among Us

Apex Legends

ARC Raiders

Baldur's Gate 3

Call of Duty: Black Ops 6
Atom Z3735G vs Core 2 Duo SP9600: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.
Atom Z3735G
2014Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +3.2% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅Costs $299 less on MSRP ($17 MSRP vs $316 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 1794.9% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 170.1 vs 9.0 PassMark/$ ($17 MSRP vs $316 MSRP).
- ✅Draws 2W instead of 6W, a 4W reduction.
- ✅Integrated graphics onboard with Intel HD Graphics (Bay Trail), while Core 2 Duo SP9600 needs a discrete GPU.
Trade-offs
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (2 MB vs 6 MB).
Core 2 Duo SP9600
2009Why buy it
- ✅+200% larger total L3 cache (6 MB vs 2 MB).
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Atom Z3735G across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower PassMark (2,836 vs 2,891).
- ❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 9.0 vs 170.1 PassMark/$ ($316 MSRP vs $17 MSRP).
- ❌200% higher power demand at 6W vs 2W.
- ❌No integrated graphics, while Atom Z3735G can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.
Quick Answers
So, is Atom Z3735G better than Core 2 Duo SP9600?
Which one is better for gaming?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Atom Z3735G vs Core 2 Duo SP9600 Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Atom Z3735G
The Atom Z3735G is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 9 April 2014 (11 years ago). It is based on the Bay Trail-T (2013−2014) architecture. It features 4 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 1.33 GHz, with boost up to 1.83 GHz. L3 cache: 2 MB L2 Cache. L2 cache: 2 MB. Built on 22 nm process technology. Socket: UTFCBGA592. Thermal design power (TDP): 2 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 2,891 points. Launch price was $17.

Core 2 Duo SP9600
The Core 2 Duo SP9600 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 1 March 2009 (16 years ago). It is based on the Penryn (2008−2011) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency is 2.53 GHz, with boost up to 2.53 GHz. L3 cache: 6 MB L2 Cache. L2 cache: 6 MB. Built on 45 nm process technology. Socket: BGA479. Thermal design power (TDP): 25 Watt. Passmark benchmark score: 2,836 points. Launch price was $316.
Processing Power
The Atom Z3735G packs 4 cores / 4 threads, while the Core 2 Duo SP9600 offers 2 cores / 2 threads — the Atom Z3735G has 2 more cores. Boost clocks reach 1.83 GHz on the Atom Z3735G versus 2.53 GHz on the Core 2 Duo SP9600 — a 32.1% clock advantage for the Core 2 Duo SP9600 (base: 1.33 GHz vs 2.53 GHz). The Atom Z3735G uses the Bay Trail-T (2013−2014) architecture (22 nm), while the Core 2 Duo SP9600 uses Penryn (2008−2011) (45 nm). In PassMark, the Atom Z3735G scores 2,891 against the Core 2 Duo SP9600's 2,836 — a 1.9% lead for the Atom Z3735G. L3 cache: 2 MB L2 Cache on the Atom Z3735G vs 6 MB L2 Cache on the Core 2 Duo SP9600.
| Feature | Atom Z3735G | Core 2 Duo SP9600 |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 4 / 4+100% | 2 / 2 |
| Boost Clock | 1.83 GHz | 2.53 GHz+38% |
| Base Clock | 1.33 GHz | 2.53 GHz+90% |
| L3 Cache | 2 MB L2 Cache | 6 MB L2 Cache+200% |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB | 6 MB+200% |
| Process | 22 nm-51% | 45 nm |
| Architecture | Bay Trail-T (2013−2014) | Penryn (2008−2011) |
| PassMark | 2,891+2% | 2,836 |
Memory & Platform
The Atom Z3735G uses the UTFCBGA592 socket (PCIe 2.0), while the Core 2 Duo SP9600 uses BGA479 (PCIe 1.1) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.
| Feature | Atom Z3735G | Core 2 Duo SP9600 |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | UTFCBGA592 | BGA479 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 2.0+82% | PCIe 1.1 |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR3L-RS 1333 | — |
| Max RAM Capacity | 1 GB | — |
| RAM Channels | 1 | — |
| ECC Support | No | — |
| PCIe Lanes | 0 | — |
Advanced Features
The Atom Z3735G includes integrated graphics (Intel HD Graphics (Bay Trail)), while the Core 2 Duo SP9600 requires a dedicated GPU.
| Feature | Atom Z3735G | Core 2 Duo SP9600 |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | Yes | — |
| IGPU Model | Intel HD Graphics (Bay Trail) | — |
Value Analysis
At launch, the Atom Z3735G was priced at $17, while the Core 2 Duo SP9600 came in at $316. On launch pricing ($17 vs $316), Atom Z3735G was $299 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Atom Z3735G delivers 170.1 pts/$ vs 9.0 pts/$ for the Core 2 Duo SP9600 — making the Atom Z3735G the 179.9% better value option.
| Feature | Atom Z3735G | Core 2 Duo SP9600 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $17-95% | $316 |
| Performance per Dollar | 170.1+1790% | 9.0 |
| Release Date | 2014 | 2009 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.














