
Atom Z3735G
Popular choices:

Core 2 Duo SP9600
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.
Atom Z3735G
2014Why buy it
- ✅+1.9% higher PassMark.
- ✅Costs $299 less on MSRP ($17 MSRP vs $316 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 1794.9% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 170.1 vs 9.0 PassMark/$ ($17 MSRP vs $316 MSRP).
- ✅Draws 2W instead of 6W, a 4W reduction.
- ✅Integrated graphics onboard with Intel HD Graphics (Bay Trail), while Core 2 Duo SP9600 needs a discrete GPU.
Trade-offs
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (2 MB vs 6 MB).
Core 2 Duo SP9600
2009Why buy it
- ✅+200% larger total L3 cache (6 MB vs 2 MB).
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark (2,836 vs 2,891).
- ❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 9.0 vs 170.1 PassMark/$ ($316 MSRP vs $17 MSRP).
- ❌200% higher power demand at 6W vs 2W.
- ❌No integrated graphics, while Atom Z3735G can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.
Atom Z3735G
2014Core 2 Duo SP9600
2009Why buy it
- ✅+1.9% higher PassMark.
- ✅Costs $299 less on MSRP ($17 MSRP vs $316 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 1794.9% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 170.1 vs 9.0 PassMark/$ ($17 MSRP vs $316 MSRP).
- ✅Draws 2W instead of 6W, a 4W reduction.
- ✅Integrated graphics onboard with Intel HD Graphics (Bay Trail), while Core 2 Duo SP9600 needs a discrete GPU.
Why buy it
- ✅+200% larger total L3 cache (6 MB vs 2 MB).
Trade-offs
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (2 MB vs 6 MB).
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark (2,836 vs 2,891).
- ❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 9.0 vs 170.1 PassMark/$ ($316 MSRP vs $17 MSRP).
- ❌200% higher power demand at 6W vs 2W.
- ❌No integrated graphics, while Atom Z3735G can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.
Quick Answers
So, is Atom Z3735G better than Core 2 Duo SP9600?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Games Benchmarks
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | Atom Z3735G | Core 2 Duo SP9600 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 72 FPS | 71 FPS |
| medium | 72 FPS | 71 FPS |
| high | 72 FPS | 71 FPS |
| ultra | 72 FPS | 71 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 72 FPS | 71 FPS |
| medium | 72 FPS | 71 FPS |
| high | 72 FPS | 71 FPS |
| ultra | 66 FPS | 62 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 66 FPS | 64 FPS |
| medium | 55 FPS | 53 FPS |
| high | 43 FPS | 41 FPS |
| ultra | 34 FPS | 32 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | Atom Z3735G | Core 2 Duo SP9600 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 72 FPS | 71 FPS |
| medium | 72 FPS | 71 FPS |
| high | 72 FPS | 71 FPS |
| ultra | 63 FPS | 67 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 72 FPS | 71 FPS |
| medium | 72 FPS | 71 FPS |
| high | 68 FPS | 71 FPS |
| ultra | 56 FPS | 58 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 63 FPS | 71 FPS |
| medium | 56 FPS | 64 FPS |
| high | 46 FPS | 45 FPS |
| ultra | 35 FPS | 30 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | Atom Z3735G | Core 2 Duo SP9600 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 72 FPS | 71 FPS |
| medium | 72 FPS | 71 FPS |
| high | 72 FPS | 71 FPS |
| ultra | 72 FPS | 71 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 72 FPS | 71 FPS |
| medium | 72 FPS | 71 FPS |
| high | 72 FPS | 71 FPS |
| ultra | 72 FPS | 71 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 72 FPS | 71 FPS |
| medium | 72 FPS | 71 FPS |
| high | 72 FPS | 71 FPS |
| ultra | 72 FPS | 71 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | Atom Z3735G | Core 2 Duo SP9600 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 72 FPS | 71 FPS |
| medium | 72 FPS | 71 FPS |
| high | 72 FPS | 71 FPS |
| ultra | 72 FPS | 71 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 72 FPS | 71 FPS |
| medium | 72 FPS | 71 FPS |
| high | 72 FPS | 71 FPS |
| ultra | 72 FPS | 71 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 72 FPS | 71 FPS |
| medium | 72 FPS | 71 FPS |
| high | 72 FPS | 71 FPS |
| ultra | 72 FPS | 71 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Atom Z3735G and Core 2 Duo SP9600

Atom Z3735G
Atom Z3735G
The Atom Z3735G is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 9 April 2014 (11 years ago). It is based on the Bay Trail-T (2013−2014) architecture. It features 4 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 1.33 GHz, with boost up to 1.83 GHz. L3 cache: 2 MB L2 Cache. L2 cache: 2 MB. Built on 22 nm process technology. Socket: UTFCBGA592. Thermal design power (TDP): 2 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 2,891 points. Launch price was $17.

Core 2 Duo SP9600
Core 2 Duo SP9600
The Core 2 Duo SP9600 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 1 March 2009 (16 years ago). It is based on the Penryn (2008−2011) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency is 2.53 GHz, with boost up to 2.53 GHz. L3 cache: 6 MB L2 Cache. L2 cache: 6 MB. Built on 45 nm process technology. Socket: BGA479. Thermal design power (TDP): 25 Watt. Passmark benchmark score: 2,836 points. Launch price was $316.
Processing Power
The Atom Z3735G packs 4 cores / 4 threads, while the Core 2 Duo SP9600 offers 2 cores / 2 threads — the Atom Z3735G has 2 more cores. Boost clocks reach 1.83 GHz on the Atom Z3735G versus 2.53 GHz on the Core 2 Duo SP9600 — a 32.1% clock advantage for the Core 2 Duo SP9600 (base: 1.33 GHz vs 2.53 GHz). The Atom Z3735G uses the Bay Trail-T (2013−2014) architecture (22 nm), while the Core 2 Duo SP9600 uses Penryn (2008−2011) (45 nm). In PassMark, the Atom Z3735G scores 2,891 against the Core 2 Duo SP9600's 2,836 — a 1.9% lead for the Atom Z3735G. L3 cache: 2 MB L2 Cache on the Atom Z3735G vs 6 MB L2 Cache on the Core 2 Duo SP9600.
| Feature | Atom Z3735G | Core 2 Duo SP9600 |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 4 / 4+100% | 2 / 2 |
| Boost Clock | 1.83 GHz | 2.53 GHz+38% |
| Base Clock | 1.33 GHz | 2.53 GHz+90% |
| L3 Cache | 2 MB L2 Cache | 6 MB L2 Cache+200% |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB | 6 MB+200% |
| Process | 22 nm-51% | 45 nm |
| Architecture | Bay Trail-T (2013−2014) | Penryn (2008−2011) |
| PassMark | 2,891+2% | 2,836 |
Memory & Platform
The Atom Z3735G uses the UTFCBGA592 socket (PCIe 2.0), while the Core 2 Duo SP9600 uses BGA479 (PCIe 1.1) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.
| Feature | Atom Z3735G | Core 2 Duo SP9600 |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | UTFCBGA592 | BGA479 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 2.0+82% | PCIe 1.1 |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR3L-RS 1333 | — |
| Max RAM Capacity | 1 GB | — |
| RAM Channels | 1 | — |
| ECC Support | No | — |
| PCIe Lanes | 0 | — |
Advanced Features
The Atom Z3735G includes integrated graphics (Intel HD Graphics (Bay Trail)), while the Core 2 Duo SP9600 requires a dedicated GPU.
| Feature | Atom Z3735G | Core 2 Duo SP9600 |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | Yes | — |
| IGPU Model | Intel HD Graphics (Bay Trail) | — |
Value Analysis
The Atom Z3735G launched at $17 MSRP, while the Core 2 Duo SP9600 debuted at $316. On MSRP ($17 vs $316), the Atom Z3735G is $299 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Atom Z3735G delivers 170.1 pts/$ vs 9.0 pts/$ for the Core 2 Duo SP9600 — making the Atom Z3735G the 179.9% better value option.
| Feature | Atom Z3735G | Core 2 Duo SP9600 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $17-95% | $316 |
| Performance per Dollar | 170.1+1790% | 9.0 |
| Release Date | 2014 | 2009 |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.












