PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Atom Z3735G vs Core i3-4130T FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Atom Z3735G vs Core i3-4130T: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Atom Z3735G

2014

Why buy it

✅+0.5% higher PassMark.
✅Costs $107 less on MSRP ($17 MSRP vs $124 MSRP).
✅Delivers 633.2% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 170.1 vs 23.2 PassMark/$ ($17 MSRP vs $124 MSRP).
✅Draws 2W instead of 35W, a 33W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Smaller total L3 cache (2 MB vs 3 MB).
❌No boxed cooler included, unlike Core i3-4130T.

Core i3-4130T

2013

Why buy it

✅+50% larger total L3 cache (3 MB vs 2 MB).
✅100+% more PCIe lanes (16 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
✅Includes a boxed cooler (Yes), unlike Atom Z3735G.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark (2,876 vs 2,891).
❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 23.2 vs 170.1 PassMark/$ ($124 MSRP vs $17 MSRP).
❌1650% higher power demand at 35W vs 2W.

Quick Answers

So, is Atom Z3735G better than Core i3-4130T?

It depends on what you want from the system. For gaming, Core i3-4130T is ahead with a 2.9% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. For rendering, compiling, streaming, and heavier multitasking, Atom Z3735G pulls ahead with 0.5% better PassMark. Core i3-4130T also has the bigger cache pool with 50% larger total L3 cache (3 MB vs 2 MB).

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Atom Z3735G is the stronger fit. You are getting 0.5% better PassMark, backed by 4 cores and 4 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Atom Z3735G is the better buy right now. Atom Z3735G comes in $107 cheaper on MSRP at $17 MSRP versus $124 MSRP, and it still gives you 0.5% better PassMark. The compromise is that Core i3-4130T is still the better pure gaming CPU with a 2.9% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. It is also 633.2% better value on MSRP (170.1 vs 23.2 PassMark/$), so you are getting the faster CPU without taking a value hit on paper.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Atom Z3735G makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2014 vs 2013) and more multi-core headroom with 4 cores / 4 threads instead of 2/4. That extra compute headroom is more likely to matter as games, background tasks, and creator workloads get heavier.

Atom Z3735G vs Core i3-4130T Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Atom Z3735G

The Atom Z3735G is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 9 April 2014 (11 years ago). It is based on the Bay Trail-T (2013−2014) architecture. It features 4 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 1.33 GHz, with boost up to 1.83 GHz. L3 cache: 2 MB L2 Cache. L2 cache: 2 MB. Built on 22 nm process technology. Socket: UTFCBGA592. Thermal design power (TDP): 2 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 2,891 points. Launch price was $17.

Core i3-4130T

The Core i3-4130T is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 1 September 2013 (12 years ago). It is based on the Haswell (2013−2015) architecture. It features 2 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 2.9 GHz, with boost up to 2.9 GHz. L3 cache: 3 MB (total). L2 cache: 256 kB (per core). Built on 22 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1150. Thermal design power (TDP): 35 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 2,876 points. Launch price was $270.

⚡

Processing Power

The Atom Z3735G packs 4 cores / 4 threads, while the Core i3-4130T offers 2 cores / 4 threads — the Atom Z3735G has 2 more cores. Boost clocks reach 1.83 GHz on the Atom Z3735G versus 2.9 GHz on the Core i3-4130T — a 45.2% clock advantage for the Core i3-4130T (base: 1.33 GHz vs 2.9 GHz). The Atom Z3735G uses the Bay Trail-T (2013−2014) architecture (22 nm), while the Core i3-4130T uses Haswell (2013−2015) (22 nm). In PassMark, the Atom Z3735G scores 2,891 against the Core i3-4130T's 2,876 — a 0.5% lead for the Atom Z3735G. L3 cache: 2 MB L2 Cache on the Atom Z3735G vs 3 MB (total) on the Core i3-4130T.

Feature	Atom Z3735G	Core i3-4130T
Cores / Threads	4 / 4+100%	2 / 4
Boost Clock	1.83 GHz	2.9 GHz+58%
Base Clock	1.33 GHz	2.9 GHz+118%
L3 Cache	2 MB L2 Cache	3 MB (total)+50%
L2 Cache	2 MB+700%	256 kB (per core)
Process	22 nm	22 nm
Architecture	Bay Trail-T (2013−2014)	Haswell (2013−2015)
PassMark	2,891	2,876
Geekbench 6 Single	—	890

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Atom Z3735G uses the UTFCBGA592 socket (PCIe 2.0), while the Core i3-4130T uses LGA1150 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR3L-RS 1333 on the Atom Z3735G versus DDR3-1600 on the Core i3-4130T — the Core i3-4130T supports 20% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The Core i3-4130T supports up to 32 GB of RAM compared to 1 GB — 3100% more capacity for professional workloads. Memory channels: 1 (Atom Z3735G) vs 2 (Core i3-4130T). PCIe lanes: 0 (Atom Z3735G) vs 16 (Core i3-4130T) — the Core i3-4130T offers 16 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: Intel FC-UTBGA592 (Atom Z3735G) and H81,B85,Q85,H87,Q87,Z87,H97,Z97 (Core i3-4130T).

Feature	Atom Z3735G	Core i3-4130T
Socket	UTFCBGA592	LGA1150
PCIe Generation	PCIe 2.0	PCIe 3.0+50%
Max RAM Speed	DDR3L-RS 1333	DDR3-1600+20%
Max RAM Capacity	1 GB	32 GB+3100%
RAM Channels	1	2+100%
ECC Support	No	Yes
PCIe Lanes	0	16

🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization: not specified (Atom Z3735G) / VT-x, EPT (Core i3-4130T). Both include integrated graphics — Intel HD Graphics (Bay Trail) (Atom Z3735G) and HD Graphics 4400 (Core i3-4130T) — useful as a fallback for troubleshooting or display output without a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Core i3-4130T targets Low Power Desktop. Direct competitor: Core i3-4130T rivals A8-7600.

Feature	Atom Z3735G	Core i3-4130T
Integrated GPU	Yes	Yes
IGPU Model	Intel HD Graphics (Bay Trail)	HD Graphics 4400
Unlocked	—	No
AVX-512	—	No
Virtualization	—	VT-x, EPT
Target Use	—	Low Power Desktop

💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the Atom Z3735G was priced at $17, while the Core i3-4130T came in at $124. On launch pricing ($17 vs $124), Atom Z3735G was $107 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Atom Z3735G delivers 170.1 pts/$ vs 23.2 pts/$ for the Core i3-4130T — making the Atom Z3735G the 152% better value option.

Feature	Atom Z3735G	Core i3-4130T
MSRP	$17-86%	$124
Performance per Dollar	170.1+633%	23.2
Release Date	2014	2013

Search Atom Z3735G on Amazon

Search Core i3-4130T on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.