PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Atom Z3735G vs Core i3-4150T FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Atom Z3735G vs Core i3-4150T: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Atom Z3735G

2014

Why buy it

✅Costs $100 less on MSRP ($17 MSRP vs $117 MSRP).
✅Delivers 588.0% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 170.1 vs 24.7 PassMark/$ ($17 MSRP vs $117 MSRP).
✅Draws 2W instead of 35W, a 33W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Core i3-4150T across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Lower PassMark (2,891 vs 2,892).
❌Smaller total L3 cache (2 MB vs 3 MB).

Core i3-4150T

2014

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +3.1% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅+50% larger total L3 cache (3 MB vs 2 MB).
✅100+% more PCIe lanes (16 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 24.7 vs 170.1 PassMark/$ ($117 MSRP vs $17 MSRP).
❌1650% higher power demand at 35W vs 2W.

Quick Answers

So, is Core i3-4150T better than Atom Z3735G?

Yes. Core i3-4150T is the better all-around CPU here. It gives you a 3.1% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data and 0% better PassMark, which is enough to make it the stronger overall pick.

Which one is better for gaming?

If gaming is the priority, Core i3-4150T is the better pick. According to our tests, it delivers 3.1% more average FPS across 50 shared CPU game tests.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Core i3-4150T is the stronger fit. You are getting 0% better PassMark, backed by 2 cores and 4 threads. It also has the larger cache pool with 50% larger total L3 cache (3 MB vs 2 MB).

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Core i3-4150T is still the much better call for a fresh build. Core i3-4150T comes in 588.2% more expensive on MSRP at $117 MSRP versus $17 MSRP, and it still gives you a 3.1% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. Atom Z3735G only looks stronger on raw value math because it is extremely cheap, but that usually means used-market pricing on an obsolete 2014 platform. Even with 588.0% better value on paper (170.1 vs 24.7 PassMark/$), it really only makes sense as a cheap stopgap or a niche existing-platform option for someone already on UTFCBGA592.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Core i3-4150T is the safer long-term CPU choice because it gives you more room to grow and a better platform outlook.

Atom Z3735G vs Core i3-4150T Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Atom Z3735G

The Atom Z3735G is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 9 April 2014 (11 years ago). It is based on the Bay Trail-T (2013−2014) architecture. It features 4 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 1.33 GHz, with boost up to 1.83 GHz. L3 cache: 2 MB L2 Cache. L2 cache: 2 MB. Built on 22 nm process technology. Socket: UTFCBGA592. Thermal design power (TDP): 2 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 2,891 points. Launch price was $17.

Core i3-4150T

The Core i3-4150T is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 1 May 2014 (11 years ago). It is based on the Haswell (2013−2015) architecture. It features 2 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 3 GHz, with boost up to 2.9 GHz. L3 cache: 3 MB (total). L2 cache: 256 kB (per core). Built on 22 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1150. Thermal design power (TDP): 35 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 2,892 points. Launch price was $230.

⚡

Processing Power

The Atom Z3735G packs 4 cores / 4 threads, while the Core i3-4150T offers 2 cores / 4 threads — the Atom Z3735G has 2 more cores. Boost clocks reach 1.83 GHz on the Atom Z3735G versus 2.9 GHz on the Core i3-4150T — a 45.2% clock advantage for the Core i3-4150T (base: 1.33 GHz vs 3 GHz). The Atom Z3735G uses the Bay Trail-T (2013−2014) architecture (22 nm), while the Core i3-4150T uses Haswell (2013−2015) (22 nm). In PassMark, the Atom Z3735G scores 2,891 against the Core i3-4150T's 2,892 — a 0% lead for the Core i3-4150T. L3 cache: 2 MB L2 Cache on the Atom Z3735G vs 3 MB (total) on the Core i3-4150T.

Feature	Atom Z3735G	Core i3-4150T
Cores / Threads	4 / 4+100%	2 / 4
Boost Clock	1.83 GHz	2.9 GHz+58%
Base Clock	1.33 GHz	3 GHz+126%
L3 Cache	2 MB L2 Cache	3 MB (total)+50%
L2 Cache	2 MB+700%	256 kB (per core)
Process	22 nm	22 nm
Architecture	Bay Trail-T (2013−2014)	Haswell (2013−2015)
PassMark	2,891	2,892

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Atom Z3735G uses the UTFCBGA592 socket (PCIe 2.0), while the Core i3-4150T uses LGA1150 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR3L-RS 1333 on the Atom Z3735G versus DDR3-1600 on the Core i3-4150T — the Core i3-4150T supports 20% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The Core i3-4150T supports up to 32 GB of RAM compared to 1 GB — 3100% more capacity for professional workloads. Memory channels: 1 (Atom Z3735G) vs 2 (Core i3-4150T). PCIe lanes: 0 (Atom Z3735G) vs 16 (Core i3-4150T) — the Core i3-4150T offers 16 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives.

Feature	Atom Z3735G	Core i3-4150T
Socket	UTFCBGA592	LGA1150
PCIe Generation	PCIe 2.0	PCIe 3.0+50%
Max RAM Speed	DDR3L-RS 1333	DDR3-1600+20%
Max RAM Capacity	1 GB	32 GB+3100%
RAM Channels	1	2+100%
ECC Support	No	Yes
PCIe Lanes	0	16

🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization: not specified (Atom Z3735G) / VT-x, VT-d (Core i3-4150T). Both include integrated graphics — Intel HD Graphics (Bay Trail) (Atom Z3735G) and HD Graphics 4400 (Core i3-4150T) — useful as a fallback for troubleshooting or display output without a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Core i3-4150T targets Desktop Low Power.

Feature	Atom Z3735G	Core i3-4150T
Integrated GPU	Yes	Yes
IGPU Model	Intel HD Graphics (Bay Trail)	HD Graphics 4400
Unlocked	—	No
AVX-512	—	No
Virtualization	—	VT-x, VT-d
Target Use	—	Desktop Low Power

💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the Atom Z3735G was priced at $17, while the Core i3-4150T came in at $117. On launch pricing ($17 vs $117), Atom Z3735G was $100 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Atom Z3735G delivers 170.1 pts/$ vs 24.7 pts/$ for the Core i3-4150T — making the Atom Z3735G the 149.2% better value option.

Feature	Atom Z3735G	Core i3-4150T
MSRP	$17-85%	$117
Performance per Dollar	170.1+589%	24.7
Release Date	2014	2014

Search Atom Z3735G on Amazon

Search Core i3-4150T on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.