Athlon X4 750K vs Atom Z3735G

CPU

GPU

Athlon X4 750K

4 Cores4 Thrd100 WWMax: 4 GHz2012

Similar parts

·······

Buy on Amazon

Atom Z3735G

4 Cores4 Thrd2 WWMax: 1.83 GHz2014

Similar parts

·······

Buy on Amazon

Athlon X4 750K vs Atom Z3735G Performance Spectrum

Athlon X4 750K

4 / 4

2,879

0.0%

Ryzen Threadripper 3990X

Atom Z3735G

4 / 4

2,891

+0.4%

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Athlon X4 750K vs Atom Z3735G FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Athlon X4 750K vs Atom Z3735G: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Athlon X4 750K

2012

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +7.7% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅100+% more PCIe lanes (16 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark (2,879 vs 2,891).
❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 31.6 vs 170.1 PassMark/$ ($91 MSRP vs $17 MSRP).
❌4900% higher power demand at 100W vs 2W.
❌No integrated graphics, while Atom Z3735G can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.

Atom Z3735G

2014

Why buy it

✅+0.4% higher PassMark.
✅Costs $74 less on MSRP ($17 MSRP vs $91 MSRP).
✅Delivers 437.5% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 170.1 vs 31.6 PassMark/$ ($17 MSRP vs $91 MSRP).
✅Draws 2W instead of 100W, a 98W reduction.
✅Integrated graphics onboard with Intel HD Graphics (Bay Trail), while Athlon X4 750K needs a discrete GPU.

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Athlon X4 750K across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.

Quick Answers

So, is Atom Z3735G better than Athlon X4 750K?

It depends on what you want from the system. For gaming, Athlon X4 750K is ahead with a 7.7% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. For rendering, compiling, streaming, and heavier multitasking, Atom Z3735G pulls ahead with 0.4% better PassMark.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Atom Z3735G is the stronger fit. You are getting 0.4% better PassMark, backed by 4 cores and 4 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Atom Z3735G is the better buy right now. Atom Z3735G comes in $74 cheaper on MSRP at $17 MSRP versus $91 MSRP, and it still gives you 0.4% better PassMark. The compromise is that Athlon X4 750K is still the better pure gaming CPU with a 7.7% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. It is also 437.5% better value on MSRP (170.1 vs 31.6 PassMark/$), so you are getting the faster CPU without taking a value hit on paper.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Atom Z3735G makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2014 vs 2012) and more multi-core headroom with 4 cores / 4 threads instead of 4/4. That extra compute headroom is more likely to matter as games, background tasks, and creator workloads get heavier.

Athlon X4 750K vs Atom Z3735G Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Athlon X4 750K

The Athlon X4 750K is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 2009-01-01. It is based on the Trinity (2012−2013) architecture. It features 4 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 3.4 GHz, with boost up to 4 GHz. L2 cache: 4 MB (total). Built on 32 nm process technology. Socket: FM2. Thermal design power (TDP): 100 Watt. Memory support: DDR3-1866. Passmark benchmark score: 2,879 points. Launch price was $149.

Atom Z3735G

The Atom Z3735G is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 9 April 2014 (11 years ago). It is based on the Bay Trail-T (2013−2014) architecture. It features 4 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 1.33 GHz, with boost up to 1.83 GHz. L3 cache: 2 MB L2 Cache. L2 cache: 2 MB. Built on 22 nm process technology. Socket: UTFCBGA592. Thermal design power (TDP): 2 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 2,891 points. Launch price was $17.

⚡

Processing Power

Both the Athlon X4 750K and Atom Z3735G share an identical 4-core/4-thread configuration. Boost clocks reach 4 GHz on the Athlon X4 750K versus 1.83 GHz on the Atom Z3735G — a 74.4% clock advantage for the Athlon X4 750K (base: 3.4 GHz vs 1.33 GHz). The Athlon X4 750K uses the Trinity (2012−2013) architecture (32 nm), while the Atom Z3735G uses Bay Trail-T (2013−2014) (22 nm). In PassMark, the Athlon X4 750K scores 2,879 against the Atom Z3735G's 2,891 — a 0.4% lead for the Atom Z3735G.

Feature	Athlon X4 750K	Atom Z3735G
Cores / Threads	4 / 4	4 / 4
Boost Clock	4 GHz+119%	1.83 GHz
Base Clock	3.4 GHz+156%	1.33 GHz
L3 Cache	—	2 MB L2 Cache
L2 Cache	4 MB (total)+100%	2 MB
Process	32 nm	22 nm-31%
Architecture	Trinity (2012−2013)	Bay Trail-T (2013−2014)
PassMark	2,879	2,891

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Athlon X4 750K uses the FM2 socket (PCIe 2.0), while the Atom Z3735G uses UTFCBGA592 (PCIe 2.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR3-1866 on the Athlon X4 750K versus DDR3L-RS 1333 on the Atom Z3735G — the Athlon X4 750K supports 40% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The Athlon X4 750K supports up to 64 GB of RAM compared to 1 GB — 6300% more capacity for professional workloads. Memory channels: 2 (Athlon X4 750K) vs 1 (Atom Z3735G). PCIe lanes: 16 (Athlon X4 750K) vs 0 (Atom Z3735G) — the Athlon X4 750K offers 16 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: AMD FM2 (Athlon X4 750K) and Intel FC-UTBGA592 (Atom Z3735G).

Feature	Athlon X4 750K	Atom Z3735G
Socket	FM2	UTFCBGA592
PCIe Generation	PCIe 2.0	PCIe 2.0
Max RAM Speed	DDR3-1866+40%	DDR3L-RS 1333
Max RAM Capacity	64 GB+6300%	1 GB
RAM Channels	2+100%	1
ECC Support	No	No
PCIe Lanes	16	0

🔧

Advanced Features

The Atom Z3735G includes integrated graphics (Intel HD Graphics (Bay Trail)), while the Athlon X4 750K requires a dedicated GPU.

Feature	Athlon X4 750K	Atom Z3735G
Integrated GPU	No	Yes
IGPU Model	—	Intel HD Graphics (Bay Trail)

💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the Athlon X4 750K was priced at $91, while the Atom Z3735G came in at $17. On launch pricing ($91 vs $17), Atom Z3735G was $74 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Athlon X4 750K delivers 31.6 pts/$ vs 170.1 pts/$ for the Atom Z3735G — making the Atom Z3735G the 137.3% better value option.

Feature	Athlon X4 750K	Atom Z3735G
MSRP	$91	$17-81%
Performance per Dollar	31.6	170.1+438%
Release Date	2012	2014

Search Athlon X4 750K on Amazon

Search Atom Z3735G on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.