Athlon X4 750K vs Core i5-3360M

Athlon X4 750K vs Core i5-3360M Performance Spectrum

Athlon X4 750K

4 / 4

2,879

0.0%

Ryzen Threadripper 3990X

Core i5-3360M

2 / 4

2,892

+0.5%

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Athlon X4 750K vs Core i5-3360M FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Athlon X4 750K vs Core i5-3360M: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Athlon X4 750K

2012

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +5.6% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅Draws 100W instead of 512W, a 412W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark (2,879 vs 2,892).
❌Launch MSRP is still $91 MSRP, while Core i5-3360M mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
❌No integrated graphics, while Core i5-3360M can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.

Core i5-3360M

2012

Why buy it

✅+0.5% higher PassMark.
✅Integrated graphics onboard with Intel HD Graphics 4000, while Athlon X4 750K needs a discrete GPU.

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Athlon X4 750K across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌412% higher power demand at 512W vs 100W.

Quick Answers

So, is Athlon X4 750K better than Core i5-3360M?

It depends on what you want from the system. For gaming, Athlon X4 750K is ahead with a 5.6% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. For rendering, compiling, streaming, and heavier multitasking, Core i5-3360M pulls ahead with 0.5% better PassMark.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Core i5-3360M is the stronger fit. You are getting 0.5% better PassMark, backed by 2 cores and 4 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Athlon X4 750K is the better buy right now. Athlon X4 750K comes in at an unclear MSRP at $91 MSRP versus unclear MSRP, and it still gives you a 5.6% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. The compromise is that Core i5-3360M is still stronger for heavier multi-core work with 0.5% better PassMark. It is also 100.0% better value on MSRP (31.6 vs 0.0 PassMark/$), so you are getting the faster CPU without taking a value hit on paper.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Core i5-3360M is the safer long-term CPU choice because it gives you more room to grow and a better platform outlook.

Athlon X4 750K vs Core i5-3360M Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Athlon X4 750K

The Athlon X4 750K is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 2009-01-01. It is based on the Trinity (2012−2013) architecture. It features 4 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 3.4 GHz, with boost up to 4 GHz. L2 cache: 4 MB (total). Built on 32 nm process technology. Socket: FM2. Thermal design power (TDP): 100 Watt. Memory support: DDR3-1866. Passmark benchmark score: 2,879 points. Launch price was $149.

Core i5-3360M

The Core i5-3360M is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 1 June 2012 (13 years ago). It is based on the Ivy Bridge (2012−2013) architecture. It features 2 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 2.8 GHz, with boost up to 3.5 GHz. L3 cache: 3 MB (total). L2 cache: 256K (per core). Built on 22 nm process technology. Socket: PGA988. Thermal design power (TDP): 35 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 2,892 points. Launch price was $266.

⚡

Processing Power

The Athlon X4 750K packs 4 cores / 4 threads, while the Core i5-3360M offers 2 cores / 4 threads — the Athlon X4 750K has 2 more cores. Boost clocks reach 4 GHz on the Athlon X4 750K versus 3.5 GHz on the Core i5-3360M — a 13.3% clock advantage for the Athlon X4 750K (base: 3.4 GHz vs 2.8 GHz). The Athlon X4 750K uses the Trinity (2012−2013) architecture (32 nm), while the Core i5-3360M uses Ivy Bridge (2012−2013) (22 nm). In PassMark, the Athlon X4 750K scores 2,879 against the Core i5-3360M's 2,892 — a 0.5% lead for the Core i5-3360M.

Feature	Athlon X4 750K	Core i5-3360M
Cores / Threads	4 / 4+100%	2 / 4
Boost Clock	4 GHz+14%	3.5 GHz
Base Clock	3.4 GHz+21%	2.8 GHz
L3 Cache	—	3 MB (total)
L2 Cache	4 MB (total)	256K (per core)+6300%
Process	32 nm	22 nm-31%
Architecture	Trinity (2012−2013)	Ivy Bridge (2012−2013)
PassMark	2,879	2,892

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Athlon X4 750K uses the FM2 socket (PCIe 2.0), while the Core i5-3360M uses PGA988 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR3-1866 on the Athlon X4 750K versus 1600 on the Core i5-3360M — the Athlon X4 750K supports 16.6% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The Athlon X4 750K supports up to 64 GB of RAM compared to 32 GB — 100% more capacity for professional workloads. Both feature 2-channel memory with ECC support. Both provide 16 PCIe lanes. Chipset compatibility: AMD FM2 (Athlon X4 750K) and HM75,HM76,HM77,QM77,QS77 (Core i5-3360M).

Feature	Athlon X4 750K	Core i5-3360M
Socket	FM2	PGA988
PCIe Generation	PCIe 2.0	PCIe 3.0+50%
Max RAM Speed	DDR3-1866+17%	1600
Max RAM Capacity	64 GB+100%	32 GB
RAM Channels	2	2
ECC Support	No	No
PCIe Lanes	16	16

🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization: not specified (Athlon X4 750K) / true (Core i5-3360M). The Core i5-3360M includes integrated graphics (Intel HD Graphics 4000), while the Athlon X4 750K requires a dedicated GPU. Direct competitor: Core i5-3360M rivals AMD A10-4600M.