
Athlon X4 750K

Core i5-4210M
Athlon X4 750K vs Core i5-4210M Performance Spectrum
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Athlon X4 750K vs Core i5-4210M FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Valorant

Among Us

Apex Legends

ARC Raiders

Baldur's Gate 3

Call of Duty: Black Ops 6
Athlon X4 750K vs Core i5-4210M: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.
Athlon X4 750K
2012Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +8.6% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅Draws 100W instead of 512W, a 412W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark (2,879 vs 2,899).
- ❌Launch MSRP is still $91 MSRP, while Core i5-4210M mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
- ❌No integrated graphics, while Core i5-4210M can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.
Core i5-4210M
2014Why buy it
- ✅+0.7% higher PassMark.
- ✅Integrated graphics onboard with HD Graphics 4600, while Athlon X4 750K needs a discrete GPU.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Athlon X4 750K across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌412% higher power demand at 512W vs 100W.
Quick Answers
So, is Athlon X4 750K better than Core i5-4210M?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Athlon X4 750K vs Core i5-4210M Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Athlon X4 750K
The Athlon X4 750K is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 2009-01-01. It is based on the Trinity (2012−2013) architecture. It features 4 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 3.4 GHz, with boost up to 4 GHz. L2 cache: 4 MB (total). Built on 32 nm process technology. Socket: FM2. Thermal design power (TDP): 100 Watt. Memory support: DDR3-1866. Passmark benchmark score: 2,879 points. Launch price was $149.

Core i5-4210M
The Core i5-4210M is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 14 April 2014 (11 years ago). It is based on the Haswell (2013−2015) architecture. It features 2 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 2.6 GHz, with boost up to 3.2 GHz. L3 cache: 3 MB. L2 cache: 512 kB. Built on 22 nm process technology. Socket: PGA946. Thermal design power (TDP): 37 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 2,899 points. Launch price was $225.
Processing Power
The Athlon X4 750K packs 4 cores / 4 threads, while the Core i5-4210M offers 2 cores / 4 threads — the Athlon X4 750K has 2 more cores. Boost clocks reach 4 GHz on the Athlon X4 750K versus 3.2 GHz on the Core i5-4210M — a 22.2% clock advantage for the Athlon X4 750K (base: 3.4 GHz vs 2.6 GHz). The Athlon X4 750K uses the Trinity (2012−2013) architecture (32 nm), while the Core i5-4210M uses Haswell (2013−2015) (22 nm). In PassMark, the Athlon X4 750K scores 2,879 against the Core i5-4210M's 2,899 — a 0.7% lead for the Core i5-4210M.
| Feature | Athlon X4 750K | Core i5-4210M |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 4 / 4+100% | 2 / 4 |
| Boost Clock | 4 GHz+25% | 3.2 GHz |
| Base Clock | 3.4 GHz+31% | 2.6 GHz |
| L3 Cache | — | 3 MB |
| L2 Cache | 4 MB (total)+700% | 512 kB |
| Process | 32 nm | 22 nm-31% |
| Architecture | Trinity (2012−2013) | Haswell (2013−2015) |
| PassMark | 2,879 | 2,899 |
| Geekbench 6 Single | — | 959 |
Memory & Platform
The Athlon X4 750K uses the FM2 socket (PCIe 2.0), while the Core i5-4210M uses PGA946 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR3-1866 on the Athlon X4 750K versus DDR3L-1600 on the Core i5-4210M — the Athlon X4 750K supports 16.6% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The Athlon X4 750K supports up to 64 GB of RAM compared to 32 GB — 100% more capacity for professional workloads. Both feature 2-channel memory with ECC support. Both provide 16 PCIe lanes. Chipset compatibility: AMD FM2 (Athlon X4 750K) and HM86,HM87,QM87 (Core i5-4210M).
| Feature | Athlon X4 750K | Core i5-4210M |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | FM2 | PGA946 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 2.0 | PCIe 3.0+50% |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR3-1866+17% | DDR3L-1600 |
| Max RAM Capacity | 64 GB+100% | 32 GB |
| RAM Channels | 2 | 2 |
| ECC Support | No | No |
| PCIe Lanes | 16 | 16 |
Advanced Features
Virtualization: not specified (Athlon X4 750K) / VT-x, EPT (Core i5-4210M). The Core i5-4210M includes integrated graphics (HD Graphics 4600), while the Athlon X4 750K requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Core i5-4210M targets Mainstream Laptop. Direct competitor: Core i5-4210M rivals A10-5750M.
| Feature | Athlon X4 750K | Core i5-4210M |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | No | Yes |
| IGPU Model | — | HD Graphics 4600 |
| Unlocked | — | No |
| AVX-512 | — | No |
| Virtualization | — | VT-x, EPT |
| Target Use | — | Mainstream Laptop |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.















