Athlon X4 750K vs Core i3-4130T

CPU

GPU

Athlon X4 750K

4 Cores4 Thrd100 WWMax: 4 GHz2012

Similar parts

·······

Buy on Amazon

Core i3-4130T

2 Cores4 Thrd35 WWMax: 2.9 GHz2013

Similar parts

·······

Buy on Amazon

Athlon X4 750K vs Core i3-4130T Performance Spectrum

Athlon X4 750K

4 / 4

2,879

+0.1%

Ryzen Threadripper 3990X

Core i3-4130T

2 / 4

2,876

0.0%

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Athlon X4 750K vs Core i3-4130T FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Athlon X4 750K vs Core i3-4130T: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Athlon X4 750K

2012

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +4.6% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅Costs $33 less on MSRP ($91 MSRP vs $124 MSRP).
✅Delivers 36.4% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 31.6 vs 23.2 PassMark/$ ($91 MSRP vs $124 MSRP).

Trade-offs

❌185.7% higher power demand at 100W vs 35W.
❌No integrated graphics, while Core i3-4130T can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.
❌No boxed cooler included, unlike Core i3-4130T.

Core i3-4130T

2013

Why buy it

✅Draws 35W instead of 100W, a 65W reduction.
✅Integrated graphics onboard with HD Graphics 4400, while Athlon X4 750K needs a discrete GPU.
✅Includes a boxed cooler (Yes), unlike Athlon X4 750K.

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Athlon X4 750K across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Lower PassMark (2,876 vs 2,879).
❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 23.2 vs 31.6 PassMark/$ ($124 MSRP vs $91 MSRP).

Quick Answers

So, is Athlon X4 750K better than Core i3-4130T?

Yes. Athlon X4 750K is the better all-around CPU here. It gives you a 4.6% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data and 0.1% better PassMark, which is enough to make it the stronger overall pick.

Which one is better for gaming?

If gaming is the priority, Athlon X4 750K is the better pick. According to our tests, it delivers 4.6% more average FPS across 50 shared CPU game tests.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Athlon X4 750K is the stronger fit. You are getting 0.1% better PassMark, backed by 4 cores and 4 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Athlon X4 750K is the better buy right now. Athlon X4 750K comes in $33 cheaper on MSRP at $91 MSRP versus $124 MSRP, and it still gives you a 4.6% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. It is also 36.4% better value on MSRP (31.6 vs 23.2 PassMark/$), so you are getting the faster CPU without taking a value hit on paper.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Core i3-4130T makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2013 vs 2012). That makes it the safer long-term bet.

Athlon X4 750K vs Core i3-4130T Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Athlon X4 750K

The Athlon X4 750K is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 2009-01-01. It is based on the Trinity (2012−2013) architecture. It features 4 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 3.4 GHz, with boost up to 4 GHz. L2 cache: 4 MB (total). Built on 32 nm process technology. Socket: FM2. Thermal design power (TDP): 100 Watt. Memory support: DDR3-1866. Passmark benchmark score: 2,879 points. Launch price was $149.

Core i3-4130T

The Core i3-4130T is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 1 September 2013 (12 years ago). It is based on the Haswell (2013−2015) architecture. It features 2 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 2.9 GHz, with boost up to 2.9 GHz. L3 cache: 3 MB (total). L2 cache: 256 kB (per core). Built on 22 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1150. Thermal design power (TDP): 35 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 2,876 points. Launch price was $270.

⚡

Processing Power

The Athlon X4 750K packs 4 cores / 4 threads, while the Core i3-4130T offers 2 cores / 4 threads — the Athlon X4 750K has 2 more cores. Boost clocks reach 4 GHz on the Athlon X4 750K versus 2.9 GHz on the Core i3-4130T — a 31.9% clock advantage for the Athlon X4 750K (base: 3.4 GHz vs 2.9 GHz). The Athlon X4 750K uses the Trinity (2012−2013) architecture (32 nm), while the Core i3-4130T uses Haswell (2013−2015) (22 nm). In PassMark, the Athlon X4 750K scores 2,879 against the Core i3-4130T's 2,876 — a 0.1% lead for the Athlon X4 750K.

Feature	Athlon X4 750K	Core i3-4130T
Cores / Threads	4 / 4+100%	2 / 4
Boost Clock	4 GHz+38%	2.9 GHz
Base Clock	3.4 GHz+17%	2.9 GHz
L3 Cache	—	3 MB (total)
L2 Cache	4 MB (total)+1500%	256 kB (per core)
Process	32 nm	22 nm-31%
Architecture	Trinity (2012−2013)	Haswell (2013−2015)
PassMark	2,879	2,876
Geekbench 6 Single	—	890

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Athlon X4 750K uses the FM2 socket (PCIe 2.0), while the Core i3-4130T uses LGA1150 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR3-1866 on the Athlon X4 750K versus DDR3-1600 on the Core i3-4130T — the Athlon X4 750K supports 16.6% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The Athlon X4 750K supports up to 64 GB of RAM compared to 32 GB — 100% more capacity for professional workloads. Both feature 2-channel memory with ECC support. Both provide 16 PCIe lanes. Chipset compatibility: AMD FM2 (Athlon X4 750K) and H81,B85,Q85,H87,Q87,Z87,H97,Z97 (Core i3-4130T).

Feature	Athlon X4 750K	Core i3-4130T
Socket	FM2	LGA1150
PCIe Generation	PCIe 2.0	PCIe 3.0+50%
Max RAM Speed	DDR3-1866+17%	DDR3-1600
Max RAM Capacity	64 GB+100%	32 GB
RAM Channels	2	2
ECC Support	No	Yes
PCIe Lanes	16	16

🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization: not specified (Athlon X4 750K) / VT-x, EPT (Core i3-4130T). The Core i3-4130T includes integrated graphics (HD Graphics 4400), while the Athlon X4 750K requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Core i3-4130T targets Low Power Desktop. Direct competitor: Core i3-4130T rivals A8-7600.

Feature	Athlon X4 750K	Core i3-4130T
Integrated GPU	No	Yes
IGPU Model	—	HD Graphics 4400
Unlocked	—	No
AVX-512	—	No
Virtualization	—	VT-x, EPT
Target Use	—	Low Power Desktop

💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the Athlon X4 750K was priced at $91, while the Core i3-4130T came in at $124. On launch pricing ($91 vs $124), Athlon X4 750K was $33 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Athlon X4 750K delivers 31.6 pts/$ vs 23.2 pts/$ for the Core i3-4130T — making the Athlon X4 750K the 30.8% better value option.

Feature	Athlon X4 750K	Core i3-4130T
MSRP	$91-27%	$124
Performance per Dollar	31.6+36%	23.2
Release Date	2012	2013

Search Athlon X4 750K on Amazon

Search Core i3-4130T on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.