Athlon X4 750K vs Core i3-4150T

CPU

GPU

Athlon X4 750K

4 Cores4 Thrd100 WWMax: 4 GHz2012

Similar parts

·······

Buy on Amazon

Core i3-4150T

2 Cores4 Thrd35 WWMax: 2.9 GHz2014

Similar parts

·······

Buy on Amazon

Athlon X4 750K vs Core i3-4150T Performance Spectrum

Athlon X4 750K

4 / 4

2,879

0.0%

Ryzen Threadripper 3990X

Core i3-4150T

2 / 4

2,892

+0.5%

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Athlon X4 750K vs Core i3-4150T FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Athlon X4 750K vs Core i3-4150T: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Athlon X4 750K

2012

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +4.4% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅Costs $26 less on MSRP ($91 MSRP vs $117 MSRP).
✅Delivers 28.0% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 31.6 vs 24.7 PassMark/$ ($91 MSRP vs $117 MSRP).

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark (2,879 vs 2,892).
❌185.7% higher power demand at 100W vs 35W.
❌No integrated graphics, while Core i3-4150T can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.

Core i3-4150T

2014

Why buy it

✅+0.5% higher PassMark.
✅Draws 35W instead of 100W, a 65W reduction.
✅Integrated graphics onboard with HD Graphics 4400, while Athlon X4 750K needs a discrete GPU.

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Athlon X4 750K across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 24.7 vs 31.6 PassMark/$ ($117 MSRP vs $91 MSRP).

Quick Answers

So, is Core i3-4150T better than Athlon X4 750K?

It depends on what you want from the system. For gaming, Athlon X4 750K is ahead with a 4.4% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. For rendering, compiling, streaming, and heavier multitasking, Core i3-4150T pulls ahead with 0.5% better PassMark.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Core i3-4150T is the stronger fit. You are getting 0.5% better PassMark, backed by 2 cores and 4 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Core i3-4150T is still the much better call for a fresh build. Core i3-4150T comes in 28.6% more expensive on MSRP at $117 MSRP versus $91 MSRP, and it still gives you 0.5% better PassMark. Athlon X4 750K only looks stronger on raw value math because it is extremely cheap, but that usually means used-market pricing on an obsolete 2012 platform. Even with 28.0% better value on paper (31.6 vs 24.7 PassMark/$), it really only makes sense as a cheap stopgap or a niche existing-platform option for someone already on FM2.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Core i3-4150T makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2014 vs 2012) and more multi-core headroom with 2 cores / 4 threads instead of 4/4. That extra compute headroom is more likely to matter as games, background tasks, and creator workloads get heavier.

Athlon X4 750K vs Core i3-4150T Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Athlon X4 750K

The Athlon X4 750K is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 2009-01-01. It is based on the Trinity (2012−2013) architecture. It features 4 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 3.4 GHz, with boost up to 4 GHz. L2 cache: 4 MB (total). Built on 32 nm process technology. Socket: FM2. Thermal design power (TDP): 100 Watt. Memory support: DDR3-1866. Passmark benchmark score: 2,879 points. Launch price was $149.

Core i3-4150T

The Core i3-4150T is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 1 May 2014 (11 years ago). It is based on the Haswell (2013−2015) architecture. It features 2 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 3 GHz, with boost up to 2.9 GHz. L3 cache: 3 MB (total). L2 cache: 256 kB (per core). Built on 22 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1150. Thermal design power (TDP): 35 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 2,892 points. Launch price was $230.

⚡

Processing Power

The Athlon X4 750K packs 4 cores / 4 threads, while the Core i3-4150T offers 2 cores / 4 threads — the Athlon X4 750K has 2 more cores. Boost clocks reach 4 GHz on the Athlon X4 750K versus 2.9 GHz on the Core i3-4150T — a 31.9% clock advantage for the Athlon X4 750K (base: 3.4 GHz vs 3 GHz). The Athlon X4 750K uses the Trinity (2012−2013) architecture (32 nm), while the Core i3-4150T uses Haswell (2013−2015) (22 nm). In PassMark, the Athlon X4 750K scores 2,879 against the Core i3-4150T's 2,892 — a 0.5% lead for the Core i3-4150T.

Feature	Athlon X4 750K	Core i3-4150T
Cores / Threads	4 / 4+100%	2 / 4
Boost Clock	4 GHz+38%	2.9 GHz
Base Clock	3.4 GHz+13%	3 GHz
L3 Cache	—	3 MB (total)
L2 Cache	4 MB (total)+1500%	256 kB (per core)
Process	32 nm	22 nm-31%
Architecture	Trinity (2012−2013)	Haswell (2013−2015)
PassMark	2,879	2,892

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Athlon X4 750K uses the FM2 socket (PCIe 2.0), while the Core i3-4150T uses LGA1150 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR3-1866 on the Athlon X4 750K versus DDR3-1600 on the Core i3-4150T — the Athlon X4 750K supports 16.6% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The Athlon X4 750K supports up to 64 GB of RAM compared to 32 GB — 100% more capacity for professional workloads. Both feature 2-channel memory with ECC support. Both provide 16 PCIe lanes.

Feature	Athlon X4 750K	Core i3-4150T
Socket	FM2	LGA1150
PCIe Generation	PCIe 2.0	PCIe 3.0+50%
Max RAM Speed	DDR3-1866+17%	DDR3-1600
Max RAM Capacity	64 GB+100%	32 GB
RAM Channels	2	2
ECC Support	No	Yes
PCIe Lanes	16	16

🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization: not specified (Athlon X4 750K) / VT-x, VT-d (Core i3-4150T). The Core i3-4150T includes integrated graphics (HD Graphics 4400), while the Athlon X4 750K requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Core i3-4150T targets Desktop Low Power.

Feature	Athlon X4 750K	Core i3-4150T
Integrated GPU	No	Yes
IGPU Model	—	HD Graphics 4400
Unlocked	—	No
AVX-512	—	No
Virtualization	—	VT-x, VT-d
Target Use	—	Desktop Low Power

💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the Athlon X4 750K was priced at $91, while the Core i3-4150T came in at $117. On launch pricing ($91 vs $117), Athlon X4 750K was $26 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Athlon X4 750K delivers 31.6 pts/$ vs 24.7 pts/$ for the Core i3-4150T — making the Athlon X4 750K the 24.6% better value option.

Feature	Athlon X4 750K	Core i3-4150T
MSRP	$91-22%	$117
Performance per Dollar	31.6+28%	24.7
Release Date	2012	2014

Search Athlon X4 750K on Amazon

Search Core i3-4150T on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.