Atom Z3735G vs Celeron N2910

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Atom Z3735G vs Celeron N2910 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Atom Z3735G vs Celeron N2910: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Atom Z3735G

2014

Why buy it

✅Draws 2W instead of 7W, a 5W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Celeron N2910 across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Lower PassMark (2,891 vs 2,907).
❌Launch MSRP is still $17 MSRP, while Celeron N2910 mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.

Celeron N2910

2013

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +6.2% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅100+% more PCIe lanes (4 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.

Trade-offs

❌250% higher power demand at 7W vs 2W.

Quick Answers

So, is Celeron N2910 better than Atom Z3735G?

Yes. Celeron N2910 is the better all-around CPU here. It gives you a 6.2% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data and 0.6% better PassMark, which is enough to make it the stronger overall pick.

Which one is better for gaming?

If gaming is the priority, Celeron N2910 is the better pick. According to our tests, it delivers 6.2% more average FPS across 50 shared CPU game tests.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Celeron N2910 is the stronger fit. You are getting 0.6% better PassMark, backed by 4 cores and 4 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Celeron N2910 is still the much better call for a fresh build. Celeron N2910 comes in at an unclear MSRP at unclear MSRP versus $17 MSRP, and it still gives you a 6.2% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. Atom Z3735G only looks stronger on raw value math because it is extremely cheap, but that usually means used-market pricing on an obsolete 2014 platform. Even with 100.0% better value on paper (170.1 vs 0.0 PassMark/$), it really only makes sense as a cheap stopgap or a niche existing-platform option for someone already on UTFCBGA592.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Atom Z3735G makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2014 vs 2013). That makes it the safer long-term bet.

Atom Z3735G vs Celeron N2910 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Atom Z3735G

The Atom Z3735G is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 9 April 2014 (11 years ago). It is based on the Bay Trail-T (2013−2014) architecture. It features 4 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 1.33 GHz, with boost up to 1.83 GHz. L3 cache: 2 MB L2 Cache. L2 cache: 2 MB. Built on 22 nm process technology. Socket: UTFCBGA592. Thermal design power (TDP): 2 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 2,891 points. Launch price was $17.

Celeron N2910

The Celeron N2910 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2007-01-01. It is based on the Bay Trail-M (2013−2014) architecture. It features 4 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 1.6 GHz, with boost up to 1.6 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 512K (per core). Built on 22 nm process technology. Socket: FCBGA1170. Thermal design power (TDP): 7.5 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 2,907 points. Launch price was $69.

⚡

Processing Power

Both the Atom Z3735G and Celeron N2910 share an identical 4-core/4-thread configuration. Boost clocks reach 1.83 GHz on the Atom Z3735G versus 1.6 GHz on the Celeron N2910 — a 13.4% clock advantage for the Atom Z3735G (base: 1.33 GHz vs 1.6 GHz). The Atom Z3735G uses the Bay Trail-T (2013−2014) architecture (22 nm), while the Celeron N2910 uses Bay Trail-M (2013−2014) (22 nm). In PassMark, the Atom Z3735G scores 2,891 against the Celeron N2910's 2,907 — a 0.6% lead for the Celeron N2910. L3 cache: 2 MB L2 Cache on the Atom Z3735G vs 0 kB on the Celeron N2910.

Feature	Atom Z3735G	Celeron N2910
Cores / Threads	4 / 4	4 / 4
Boost Clock	1.83 GHz+14%	1.6 GHz
Base Clock	1.33 GHz	1.6 GHz+20%
L3 Cache	2 MB L2 Cache	0 kB
L2 Cache	2 MB	512K (per core)+25500%
Process	22 nm	22 nm
Architecture	Bay Trail-T (2013−2014)	Bay Trail-M (2013−2014)
PassMark	2,891	2,907
Geekbench 6 Single	—	210
Geekbench 6 Multi	—	700

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Atom Z3735G uses the UTFCBGA592 socket (PCIe 2.0), while the Celeron N2910 uses FCBGA1170 (PCIe 2.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR3L-RS 1333 on the Atom Z3735G versus DDR3L-1066 on the Celeron N2910 — the Atom Z3735G supports 25% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The Celeron N2910 supports up to 8 GB of RAM compared to 1 GB — 700% more capacity for professional workloads. Memory channels: 1 (Atom Z3735G) vs 2 (Celeron N2910). PCIe lanes: 0 (Atom Z3735G) vs 4 (Celeron N2910) — the Celeron N2910 offers 4 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: Intel FC-UTBGA592 (Atom Z3735G) and SoC (Celeron N2910).

Feature	Atom Z3735G	Celeron N2910
Socket	UTFCBGA592	FCBGA1170
PCIe Generation	PCIe 2.0	PCIe 2.0
Max RAM Speed	DDR3L-RS 1333+25%	DDR3L-1066
Max RAM Capacity	1 GB	8 GB+700%
RAM Channels	1	2+100%
ECC Support	No	No
PCIe Lanes	0	4

🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization: not specified (Atom Z3735G) / VT-x (Celeron N2910). Both include integrated graphics — Intel HD Graphics (Bay Trail) (Atom Z3735G) and Intel HD Graphics (Bay Trail) (Celeron N2910) — useful as a fallback for troubleshooting or display output without a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Celeron N2910 targets Budget Laptop. Direct competitor: Celeron N2910 rivals AMD A4-6210.

Feature	Atom Z3735G	Celeron N2910
Integrated GPU	Yes	Yes
IGPU Model	Intel HD Graphics (Bay Trail)	Intel HD Graphics (Bay Trail)
Unlocked	—	No
AVX-512	—	No
Virtualization	—	VT-x
Target Use	—	Budget Laptop