Atom Z3735G vs Xeon X3450

Intel

Atom Z3735G

4 Cores4 Thrd2 WWMax: 1.83 GHz2014
Similar parts
·······
VS
Intel

Xeon X3450

4 Cores8 Thrd95 WWMax: 3.2 GHz2009
Similar parts
·······

Atom Z3735G vs Xeon X3450 Performance Spectrum

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Atom Z3735G vs Xeon X3450 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Atom Z3735G vs Xeon X3450: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Atom Z3735G

2014

Why buy it

  • +0.5% higher PassMark.
  • Costs $224 less on MSRP ($17 MSRP vs $241 MSRP).
  • Delivers 1324.5% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 170.1 vs 11.9 PassMark/$ ($17 MSRP vs $241 MSRP).
  • Draws 2W instead of 95W, a 93W reduction.
  • Integrated graphics onboard with Intel HD Graphics (Bay Trail), while Xeon X3450 needs a discrete GPU.

Trade-offs

  • Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Xeon X3450 across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
  • Smaller total L3 cache (2 MB vs 8 MB).
  • Less compelling for workstation-style loads than Xeon X3450, which brings 4 cores / 8 threads.

Xeon X3450

2009

Why buy it

  • Better for gaming: +8.4% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
  • +300% larger total L3 cache (8 MB vs 2 MB).
  • Better for workstations and heavier parallel workloads: 4 cores / 8 threads.

Trade-offs

  • Lower PassMark (2,877 vs 2,891).
  • Lower PassMark per dollar, at 11.9 vs 170.1 PassMark/$ ($241 MSRP vs $17 MSRP).
  • 4650% higher power demand at 95W vs 2W.
  • No integrated graphics, while Atom Z3735G can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.

Quick Answers

So, is Atom Z3735G better than Xeon X3450?
Not really, because they are built for different jobs. Xeon X3450 makes more sense for workstation-style multi-core throughput, while Atom Z3735G is the more practical desktop choice for gaming, platform cost, and everyday use.
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Atom Z3735G is the stronger fit. You are getting 0.5% better PassMark, backed by 4 cores and 4 threads.
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Atom Z3735G is the better buy right now. Atom Z3735G comes in $224 cheaper on MSRP at $17 MSRP versus $241 MSRP, and it still gives you 0.5% better PassMark. The compromise is that Xeon X3450 is still the better pure gaming CPU with a 8.4% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. It is also 1324.5% better value on MSRP (170.1 vs 11.9 PassMark/$), so you are getting the faster CPU without taking a value hit on paper.
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Atom Z3735G makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2014 vs 2009) and more multi-core headroom with 4 cores / 4 threads instead of 4/8. That extra compute headroom is more likely to matter as games, background tasks, and creator workloads get heavier.

Atom Z3735G vs Xeon X3450 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Intel

Atom Z3735G

The Atom Z3735G is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 9 April 2014 (11 years ago). It is based on the Bay Trail-T (2013−2014) architecture. It features 4 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 1.33 GHz, with boost up to 1.83 GHz. L3 cache: 2 MB L2 Cache. L2 cache: 2 MB. Built on 22 nm process technology. Socket: UTFCBGA592. Thermal design power (TDP): 2 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 2,891 points. Launch price was $17.

Intel

Xeon X3450

The Xeon X3450 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 8 September 2009 (16 years ago). It is based on the Lynnfield (2009−2010) architecture. It features 4 cores and 8 threads. Base frequency is 2.66 GHz, with boost up to 3.2 GHz. L3 cache: 8 MB (total). L2 cache: 256 kB (per core). Built on 45 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1156. Thermal design power (TDP): 95 Watt. Memory support: DDR3-800, DDR3-1066, DDR3-1333. Passmark benchmark score: 2,877 points. Launch price was $241.

Processing Power

The Atom Z3735G packs 4 cores / 4 threads, matching the Xeon X3450's 4 cores. Boost clocks reach 1.83 GHz on the Atom Z3735G versus 3.2 GHz on the Xeon X3450 — a 54.5% clock advantage for the Xeon X3450 (base: 1.33 GHz vs 2.66 GHz). The Atom Z3735G uses the Bay Trail-T (2013−2014) architecture (22 nm), while the Xeon X3450 uses Lynnfield (2009−2010) (45 nm). In PassMark, the Atom Z3735G scores 2,891 against the Xeon X3450's 2,877 — a 0.5% lead for the Atom Z3735G. L3 cache: 2 MB L2 Cache on the Atom Z3735G vs 8 MB (total) on the Xeon X3450.

FeatureAtom Z3735GXeon X3450
Cores / Threads
4 / 4
4 / 8
Boost Clock
1.83 GHz
3.2 GHz+75%
Base Clock
1.33 GHz
2.66 GHz+100%
L3 Cache
2 MB L2 Cache
8 MB (total)+300%
L2 Cache
2 MB+700%
256 kB (per core)
Process
22 nm-51%
45 nm
Architecture
Bay Trail-T (2013−2014)
Lynnfield (2009−2010)
PassMark
2,891
2,877
🧠

Memory & Platform

The Atom Z3735G uses the UTFCBGA592 socket (PCIe 2.0), while the Xeon X3450 uses LGA1156 (PCIe 2.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

FeatureAtom Z3735GXeon X3450
Socket
UTFCBGA592
LGA1156
PCIe Generation
PCIe 2.0
PCIe 2.0
Max RAM Speed
DDR3L-RS 1333
Max RAM Capacity
1 GB
RAM Channels
1
ECC Support
No
PCIe Lanes
0
🔧

Advanced Features

The Atom Z3735G includes integrated graphics (Intel HD Graphics (Bay Trail)), while the Xeon X3450 requires a dedicated GPU.

FeatureAtom Z3735GXeon X3450
Integrated GPU
Yes
IGPU Model
Intel HD Graphics (Bay Trail)
💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the Atom Z3735G was priced at $17, while the Xeon X3450 came in at $241. On launch pricing ($17 vs $241), Atom Z3735G was $224 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Atom Z3735G delivers 170.1 pts/$ vs 11.9 pts/$ for the Xeon X3450 — making the Atom Z3735G the 173.8% better value option.

FeatureAtom Z3735GXeon X3450
MSRP
$17-93%
$241
Performance per Dollar
170.1+1329%
11.9
Release Date
2014
2009

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.