
Atom Z3735G

Xeon X3450
Atom Z3735G vs Xeon X3450 Performance Spectrum
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Atom Z3735G vs Xeon X3450 FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Valorant

Among Us

Apex Legends

ARC Raiders

Baldur's Gate 3

Call of Duty: Black Ops 6
Atom Z3735G vs Xeon X3450: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.
Atom Z3735G
2014Why buy it
- ✅+0.5% higher PassMark.
- ✅Costs $224 less on MSRP ($17 MSRP vs $241 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 1324.5% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 170.1 vs 11.9 PassMark/$ ($17 MSRP vs $241 MSRP).
- ✅Draws 2W instead of 95W, a 93W reduction.
- ✅Integrated graphics onboard with Intel HD Graphics (Bay Trail), while Xeon X3450 needs a discrete GPU.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Xeon X3450 across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (2 MB vs 8 MB).
- ❌Less compelling for workstation-style loads than Xeon X3450, which brings 4 cores / 8 threads.
Xeon X3450
2009Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +8.4% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅+300% larger total L3 cache (8 MB vs 2 MB).
- ✅Better for workstations and heavier parallel workloads: 4 cores / 8 threads.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark (2,877 vs 2,891).
- ❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 11.9 vs 170.1 PassMark/$ ($241 MSRP vs $17 MSRP).
- ❌4650% higher power demand at 95W vs 2W.
- ❌No integrated graphics, while Atom Z3735G can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.
Quick Answers
So, is Atom Z3735G better than Xeon X3450?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Atom Z3735G vs Xeon X3450 Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Atom Z3735G
The Atom Z3735G is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 9 April 2014 (11 years ago). It is based on the Bay Trail-T (2013−2014) architecture. It features 4 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 1.33 GHz, with boost up to 1.83 GHz. L3 cache: 2 MB L2 Cache. L2 cache: 2 MB. Built on 22 nm process technology. Socket: UTFCBGA592. Thermal design power (TDP): 2 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 2,891 points. Launch price was $17.

Xeon X3450
The Xeon X3450 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 8 September 2009 (16 years ago). It is based on the Lynnfield (2009−2010) architecture. It features 4 cores and 8 threads. Base frequency is 2.66 GHz, with boost up to 3.2 GHz. L3 cache: 8 MB (total). L2 cache: 256 kB (per core). Built on 45 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1156. Thermal design power (TDP): 95 Watt. Memory support: DDR3-800, DDR3-1066, DDR3-1333. Passmark benchmark score: 2,877 points. Launch price was $241.
Processing Power
The Atom Z3735G packs 4 cores / 4 threads, matching the Xeon X3450's 4 cores. Boost clocks reach 1.83 GHz on the Atom Z3735G versus 3.2 GHz on the Xeon X3450 — a 54.5% clock advantage for the Xeon X3450 (base: 1.33 GHz vs 2.66 GHz). The Atom Z3735G uses the Bay Trail-T (2013−2014) architecture (22 nm), while the Xeon X3450 uses Lynnfield (2009−2010) (45 nm). In PassMark, the Atom Z3735G scores 2,891 against the Xeon X3450's 2,877 — a 0.5% lead for the Atom Z3735G. L3 cache: 2 MB L2 Cache on the Atom Z3735G vs 8 MB (total) on the Xeon X3450.
| Feature | Atom Z3735G | Xeon X3450 |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 4 / 4 | 4 / 8 |
| Boost Clock | 1.83 GHz | 3.2 GHz+75% |
| Base Clock | 1.33 GHz | 2.66 GHz+100% |
| L3 Cache | 2 MB L2 Cache | 8 MB (total)+300% |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB+700% | 256 kB (per core) |
| Process | 22 nm-51% | 45 nm |
| Architecture | Bay Trail-T (2013−2014) | Lynnfield (2009−2010) |
| PassMark | 2,891 | 2,877 |
Memory & Platform
The Atom Z3735G uses the UTFCBGA592 socket (PCIe 2.0), while the Xeon X3450 uses LGA1156 (PCIe 2.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.
| Feature | Atom Z3735G | Xeon X3450 |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | UTFCBGA592 | LGA1156 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 2.0 | PCIe 2.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR3L-RS 1333 | — |
| Max RAM Capacity | 1 GB | — |
| RAM Channels | 1 | — |
| ECC Support | No | — |
| PCIe Lanes | 0 | — |
Advanced Features
The Atom Z3735G includes integrated graphics (Intel HD Graphics (Bay Trail)), while the Xeon X3450 requires a dedicated GPU.
| Feature | Atom Z3735G | Xeon X3450 |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | Yes | — |
| IGPU Model | Intel HD Graphics (Bay Trail) | — |
Value Analysis
At launch, the Atom Z3735G was priced at $17, while the Xeon X3450 came in at $241. On launch pricing ($17 vs $241), Atom Z3735G was $224 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Atom Z3735G delivers 170.1 pts/$ vs 11.9 pts/$ for the Xeon X3450 — making the Atom Z3735G the 173.8% better value option.
| Feature | Atom Z3735G | Xeon X3450 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $17-93% | $241 |
| Performance per Dollar | 170.1+1329% | 11.9 |
| Release Date | 2014 | 2009 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.














